ИЭИ ДВО РАН

ENG | RUS

Раздел Статьи
Заглавие Инновации как фактор изменения производительности предприятий: проблемы измерения и интерпретации
Страницы 93-127
Автор Домнич Егор Леонидович
кандидат экономических наук, старший научный сотрудник
Института экономических исследований ДВО РАН
ул. Тихоокеанская, 153, Хабаровск, Российская Федерация, 680042
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-1379-8053
Аннотация Цель данной статьи – представить современное состояние эмпирических исследований в области оценки влияния инноваций на производительность предприятий с детализацией проблем статистического измерения инноваций и содержательной интерпретации накопленных результатов. Для исследования выборки научных работ, посвященных количественному анализу влияния инноваций на производительность, использованы методы многофакторной систематизации, критического анализа, контент-анализа и синтетического обобщения. Проанализированы проблемы статистического измерения и содержательной интерпретации в разрезе четырех уровней: инновации как экономический феномен; инновации как фактор изменения производительности в экономике конкретной страны; инновации как фактор сравнительной экономической динамики в мировом масштабе и инновации как фактор развития промышленности России. Проведенное исследование позволяет сделать ряд выводов. В современной экономике инновации являются самостоятельным фактором производства, отличным от научных исследований, патентуемых изобретений, материально-технической базы и прочих факторов. Влияние инноваций нередко бывает незначительным на фоне прочих факторов и (или) отрицательным. Микроэкономические исследования, выполненные на основе результатов обследований предприятий, сильно ограничены в плане регионально-отраслевого и межвременного охвата экономики. Доминирование субъектного подхода к измерению инноваций и модели CDM к оценке связи между инновациями и производительностью обуславливает накопление все менее информативных результатов. Аналитический потенциал мейнстримных подходов к проблеме оценки влияния инноваций на производительность изнашивается, и компенсировать их слабые места без потери сопоставимости в ближайшей перспективе не удастся
УДК 330.3+311.3+332.1+338.23
JEL B29, D24, O32, O38
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.4.093-127
Ключевые слова технологические инновации ♦ статистика инноваций ♦ производительность
Скачать SE.2022.4.093-127.Domnich.pdf
Для цитирования Домнич Е.Л. Инновации как фактор изменения производительности предприятий: проблемы измерения и интерпретации // Пространственная экономика. 2022. Т. 18. № 3. С. 93–127. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.4.093-127
Ссылки 1. Канева М.А., Унтура Г.А. Эволюция теорий и эмпирических моделей взаимосвязи экономического роста, науки и инноваций (часть 1) // Мир экономики и управления. 2017. Т. 17. № 4. С. 5–21. https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2017-17-4-5-21
2. Канева М.А., Унтура Г.А. Эволюция теорий и эмпирических моделей взаимосвязи экономического роста, науки и инноваций (часть 2) // Мир экономики и управления. 2018. Т. 18. № 1. С. 5–17. https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2018-18-1-5-17
3. Ребязина В.А., Кущ С.П., Красников А.В., Смирнова М.М. Инновационная деятельность российских компаний: результаты эмпирического исследования // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2011. Т. 9. № 3. С. 29–54.
4. Руководство Осло. Рекомендации по сбору и анализу данных по инновациям. Третье издание / ОЭСР; ЕС. М.: ЦИСН, 2006. 192 с.
5. Трачук А.В., Линдер Н.В. Инновации и производительность российских промышленных компаний // Инновации. 2017. № 4. С. 53–65.
6. Яник А.А. Измерение вклада наук в социально-экономическое развитие: российские подходы в мировом пространстве идей // МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие. 2021. Т. 12. № 3. С. 222–253. https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3.222-253
7. Aboal D., Garda P. Technological and Non-Technological Innovation and Productivity in Services Vis-A-Vis Manufacturing Sectors // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2015. Vol. 25. Issue 5. Pp. 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1073478
8. Acemoglu D., Dell M. Productivity Differences between and Within Countries // American Economic Journal of Macroeconomics. 2010. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.2.1.169
9. Acosta M., Coronado D., Romero C. Linking Public Support, R&D, Innovation and Productivity: New Evidence from the Spanish Food Industry // Food Policy. 2015. Vol. 57. Pp. 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.09.005
10. Acs Z., Audretsch D. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991. 220 p.
11. Alvarez R., Bravo-Ortega C., Zahler A. Innovation and Productivity in Services: Evidence from Chile // Emerging Markets and Finance Trade. 2015. Vol. 51. Issue 3. Pp. 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1026696
12. Alvarez R., Crespi G.A. Heterogeneous Effects of Financial Constraints on Innovation: Evidence from Chile // Science and Public Policy. 2015. Vol. 42. Issue 5. Pp. 711–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu091
13. Archibugi D., Pianta M. Measuring Technological Change Through Patents and Innovation Surveys // Technovation. 1996. Vol. 16. Issue 9. Pp. 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4
14. Arvanitis S. Innovation and Labour Productivity in the Swiss Manufacturing Sector: An Analysis Based on Firm Panel Data / KOF Swiss Economic Institute (ETHZ). Working Paper. No. 149. 2006. 34 p. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.949408
15. Aw B.Y., Roberts M.J., Xu D.Y. R&D Investment, Exporting, and Productivity Dynamics // American Economic Review. 2011. Vol. 101. No. 4. Pp. 1312–1344. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.4.1312
16. Ballot G., Fakhfakh F., Galia F., Salter A. The Fateful Triangle: Complementarities in Performance between Product, Process and Organizational Innovation in France and in the UK // Research Policy. 2015. Vol. 44. Issue 1. Pp. 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.003
17. Baum C.F., Loof H., Nabavi P., Stephan A. A New Approach to Estimation of the R&D-Innovation-Productivity Relationship // Economics and Innovation and New Technology. 2017. Vol. 26. Issue 1–2. Pp. 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1202515
18. Baumann J., Kritikos A.S. The Link between R&D, Innovation and Productivity: Are Micro Firms Different? // Research Policy. 2016. Vol. 45. Issue 6. Pp. 1263–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.008
19. Becheikh N., Landry R., Amara N. Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993–2003 // Technovation. 2006. Vol. 26. Issue 5–6. Pp. 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016
20. Benavente J.M. The Role of Research and Innovation in Promoting Productivity in Chile // Economics of Innovation & New Technology. 2006. Vol. 15. Issue 4–5. Pp. 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500512794
21. Blanco L.R., Gu J., Prieger J.E. The Impact of Research and Development on Economic Growth and Productivity in the U. S. States // Southern Economic Journal. 2016. Vol. 82. Issue 3. Pp. 914–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12107
22. Cainelli G., Evangelista R., Savona M. Innovation and Economic Performance in Services: A Firm-Level Analysis // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2006. Vol. 30. Issue 3. Pp. 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei067
23. Carvalho L., Avellar A. Innovation and Productivity: Empirical Evidence for Brazilian Industrial Enterprises // Revista de Administracao. 2017. Vol. 52. Issue 2. Pp. 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.009
24. Castellani D., Zanfei A. Internationalisation, Innovation and Productivity: How Do Firms Differ in Italy? // The World Economy. 2007. Vol. 30. Issue 1. Pp. 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00875.x
25. Chudnovsky D., Lopez A., Pupato G. Innovation and Productivity in Developing Countries: A Study of Argentine Manufacturing Firms Behavior (1992–2001) // Research Policy. 2006. Vol. 35. Issue 2. Pp. 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.10.002
26. Cirera X., Muzi S. Measuring Firm-Level Innovation Using Short Questionnaires: Evidence from an Experiment / Policy Research. Working Paper. No. 7696. 2016. 43 p. URL: https://www.oecd.org/sti/044%20-%20WPS7696.pdf (дата обращения: май 2022).
27. Coombs R., Narandren P., Richards A. A Literature-Based Innovation Output Indicator // Research Policy. 1996. Vol. 25. Issue 3. Pp. 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00842-X
28. Crepon B., Duguet E., Mairesse J. Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 1998. Vol. 7. Issue 2. Pp. 115–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599800000031
29. Crespi F., Pianta M. Diversity in Innovation and Productivity in Europe // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2008. Vol. 18. Pp. 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0101-0
30. Crespi G., Zuniga P. Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries // World Development. 2012. Vol. 40. Issue 2. Pp. 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010
31. Criscuolo C. Innovation and Productivity: Estimating the Core Model across 18 Countries //Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic Perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2009. Pp. 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056213-5-en
32. Crowley F., McCann P. Firm Innovation and Productivity in Europe: Evidence from Innovation-Driven and Transition-Driven Economies // Applied Economics. 2018. Vol. 50. Issue 11. Pp. 1203–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1355543
33. De Loecker J. Product Differentiation, Multiproduct Firms, and Estimating the Impact of Trade Liberalization on Productivity // Econometrica. 2011. Vol. 79. Issue 5. Pp. 1407–1451. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7617
34. Doran J., O’Leary E. External Interaction, Innovation and Productivity: An Application of the Innovation Value Chain to Ireland // Spatial Economic Analysis. 2011. Vol. 6. Issue 2. Pp. 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2011.557777
35. Edeh J.N., Acedo F.J. External Supports, Innovation Efforts and Productivity: Estimation of a CDM Model for Small Firms in Developing Countries // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021. Vol. 173. 121189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121189
36. Exploring Firm-Level Innovation and Productivity in Developing Countries: The Perspective of Caribbean Small States / Edited by G. Crespi, S. Dohnert, A. Maffioli; Inter-American Development Bank. 2017. 148 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0000616
37. Fazl?oglu B., Dalg?c B., Yereli A. The Effect of Innovation on Productivity: Evidence from Turkish Manufacturing Firms // Industry and Innovation. 2019. Vol. 26. Issue 4. Pp. 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1440196
38. Firm Innovation and Productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean: The Engine of Economic Development / Edited by M. Grazzi, C. Pietrobelli; Inter-American Development Bank. 2016. 346 p. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-58151-1
39. Flor M.L., Oltra M.J. Identification of Innovating Firms Through Technological Innovation Indicators: An Application to the Spanish Ceramic Tile Industry // Research Policy. 2004. Vol. 33. Issue 2. Pp. 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.009
40. Fu X., Mohnen P., Zanello G. Innovation and Productivity in Formal and Informal Firms in Ghana // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018. No. 131. Pp. 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.08.009
41. Gallego J.M., Gutierrez L.H., Taborda R. Innovation and Productivity in the Colombian Service and Manufacturing Industries // Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2015. Vol. 51. Issue 3. Pp. 612–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1026698
42. Garcia-Pozo A., Marchante-Mera A.J., Campos-Soria J.A. Innovation, Environment, and Productivity in the Spanish Service Sector: An Implementation of A CDM Structural Model // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. Vol. 171. Pp. 1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.087
43. Goedhuys M. The Impact of Innovation Activities on Productivity and Firm Growth: Evidence from Brazil / UNU-MERIT. Working Paper Series. No. 2007-002. 2007. 33 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4778481_The_impact_of_innovation _activities_on_productivity_and_firm_growth_evidence_from_Brazil (дата обращения: май 2022).
44. Goedhuys M., Veugelers R. Innovation Strategies, Process and Product Innovations and Growth: Firm-level Evidence from Brazil // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2012. Vol. 23. Issue 4. Pp. 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2011.01.004
45. Griffith R., Huergo E., Mairesse J., Peters B. Innovation and Productivity across Four European Countries // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2006. Vol. 22. Issue 4. Pp. 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj028
46. Hall B.H. Innovation and Productivity / NBER. Working Paper. No. 17178. 2011. 34 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228217481_Innovation_and_Productivity (дата обращения: май 2022).
47. Hall B.H., Jaffe A.B. Measuring Science, Technology, and Innovation: A Review // Annals of Science and Technology Policy. 2018. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp 1–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/110.00000005
48. Hall B.H., Lotti F., Mairesse J. Innovation and Productivity in SMEs: Empirical Evidence for Italy // Small Business Economics. 2009. Vol. 33. Pp. 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8
49. Hammar N., Belarbi Y. R&D, Innovation and Productivity Relationships: Evidence from Threshold Panel Model // International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2021. Vol. 5. Issue 3. Pp. 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2021.06.002
50. Hashi I., Stojcic N. The Impact of Innovation Activities on Firm Performance Using a Multi-Stage Model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4 // Research Policy. 2013. Vol. 42. Issue 2. Pp. 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011
51. Hegde D., Shapira P. Knowledge, Technology Trajectories, and Innovation in a Developing Country Context: Evidence from a Survey of Malaysian Firms // International Journal of Technology Management. 2007. Vol. 40. No. 4. Pp. 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2007.015757
52. Hu A.G., Jefferson G.H., Jinchang Q. R&D and Technology Transfer: Firm-Level Evidence from Chinese Industry // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2005. Vol. 87. Issue 4. Pp. 780–786. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465305775098143
53. Huergo E., Jaumandreu J. Firms? Age, Process Innovation and Productivity Growth // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2004. Vol. 22. Issue 4. Pp. 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2003.12.002
54. Janz N., Loof H., Peters B. Innovation and Productivity in German and Swedish Manufacturing Firms: Is There a Common Story? // Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2004. No. 2. Pp. 184–204.
55. Jaumandreu J., Mairesse J. Disentangling the Effects of Product and Process Innovation on Cost and Demand // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2017. Vol. 26. Issue 1–2. Pp. 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1205276
56. Jefferson G., Bai H., Guan X., Yu X. R&D Performance in Chinese Industry // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2006. Vol. 15. Issue 4–5. Pp. 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500512851
57. Kleinknecht A., van Montfort K., Brouwer E. The Non-Trivial Choice between Innovation Indicators // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2002. Vol. 11. Issue 2. Pp. 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590210899
58. Kolluru S., Mukhopadhaya P. Empirical Studies on Innovation Performance in the Manufacturing and Service Sectors Since 1995: A Systematic Review // Economic Papers. 2017. Vol. 36. Issue 2. Pp. 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12167
59. Lee K., Kang S.-M. Innovation Types and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Firms // Global Economy Review. 2007. Vol. 36. Issue 4. Pp. 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265080701694512
60. Lin C.L., Lin H.L., Lin E.S. Is There a Complementarity Relationship between Product and Process Innovation on Productivity in Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms? // Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics. 2016. No. 57. Pp.139–173.
61. Loof H., Heshmati A., Apslund R., Naas S. Innovation and Performance in Manufacturing Industries: A Comparison of the Nordic Countries / SSE/EFI. Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance. No. 457. 2001. 38 p. URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.200.2832&rep=rep1&type=pdf (дата обращения: апрель 2022).
62. Mairesse J., Mohnen P., Kremp E. The Importance of R&D and Innovation for Productivity: A Reexamination in Light of the French Innovation Survey // Annales D’Economie et de Statistique. 2005. No. 79/80. Pp. 487–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/20777586
63. Mairesse J., Mohnen P., Zhao Y., Zhen F. Globalisation, Innovation and Productivity in Manufacturing Firms: A Study of Four Sectors of China / ERIA. Discussion Paper Series. No. 2012-10. 2012. 34 p. URL: https://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2012-10.pdf (дата обращения: май 2022).
64. Mairesse J., Robin S. Innovation and Productivity in France: A Firm-Level Analysis for Manufacturing and Services (1998–2000 and 2002–2004) // Symposium on Innovation at Firm Level. Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Barcelona, Spain 1 July 2008.
65. Mansfield E. How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out? // The Journal of Industrial Economics. 1985. Vol. 34. No. 2. Pp. 217–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098683
66. Mariev O., Nagieva K., Pushkarev A., Davidson N., Sohag K. Effects of R&D Spending on Productivity of the Russian Firms: Does Technological Intensity Matter? // Empirical Economics. 2021. Vol. 62. Pp. 2619–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02095-3
67. Martin L., Nguyen-Thi T.U. The Relationship between Innovation and Productivity Based on R&D and ICT Use: An Empirical Analysis of Firms in Luxembourg // Revue Economique. 2015. Vol. 66. Issue 6. Pp. 1105–1130. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.pr2.0048
68. Masso J., Vahter P. Technological Innovation and Productivity in Late-Transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys // The European Journal of Development Research. 2008. Vol. 20. Issue 2. Pp. 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810802060751
69. Michie J. Introduction. The Internationalisation of the Innovation Process // International Journal of the Economics of Business. 1998. Vol. 5. Issue 3. Pp. 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571519884387
70. Mohnen P., Hall B. Innovation and Productivity: An Update // Eurasian Business Review. 2013. Vol. 3. Issue 1. Pp. 47–65. https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353817
71. Morris D. Innovation and Productivity among Heterogeneous Firms // Research Policy. 2018. Vol. 47. Issue 10. Pp. 1918–1932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.003
72. Musolesi A., Huiban J.P. Innovation and Productivity in Knowledge Intensive Business Servi-ces // Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2010. Vol. 34. Pp. 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-009-0163-5
73. Nicolau J.L., Santa-Maria M.J. Battle Royal in Biotechnology: R&D Vs Product Vs Process Innovations // Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2015. Vol. 27. Issue 5. Pp. 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1012056
74. Parisi M.L., Schiantarelli F., Sembenelli A. Productivity, Innovation and R&D: Micro Evidence for Italy // European Economic Review. 2006. Vol. 50. Issue 8. Pp. 2037–2061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.08.002
75. Peters B. Persistence of Innovation: Stylized Facts and Panel Data Evidence // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2009. Vol. 34. Pp. 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9072-9
76. Peters B., Riley R., Siedschlag I., Vahter P., McQuinn J. Internationalisation, Innovation and Productivity in Services: Evidence from Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom // Review of World Economy. 2018. Vol. 154. Pp. 585–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-018-0313-9
77. Peters B., Roberts M., van Vuong A., Fryges H. Estimating Dynamic R&D Demand: An Analysis of Costs and Long-Run Benefits // The RAND Journal of Economics. 2017. Vol. 48. Issue 2. Pp. 409–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12181
78. Raffo J., Lhuillery S., Miotti L. Northern and Southern Innovativity: A Comparison across European and Latin American Countries // The European Journal of Development Research. 2008. Vol. 20. Pp. 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810802060777
79. Ramadani V., Hisrich R., Abazi-Alili H., Dana L.-P., Panthi L., Abazi-Bexheti L. Product Innovation and Firm Performance in Transition Economies: A Multistage Estimation Approach // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018. Vol. 140. Pp. 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.010
80. Raymond W., Mairesse J., Mohnen P., Palm F. Dynamic Models of R&D, Innovation and Productivity: Panel Data Evidence for Dutch and French Manufacturing // European Econo-mic Review. 2015. Vol. 78. Pp. 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.002
81. Raymond W., Mohnen P., Palm F., Schim S., van der Loeff. Persistence of Innovation in Dutch Manufacturing: Is it Spurious? // The Review of Economics and Statistic. 2010. Vol. 92. Issue 3. Pp. 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00004
82. Reichstein T., Salter A. Investigating the Sources of Process Innovation Among UK Manufactu-ring Firms // Industry Corporation Change. 2006. Vol. 15. Issue 4. Pp. 653–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl014
83. Rochina-Barrachina M.E., Manez J.A., Sanchis-Llopis J.A. Process Innovations and Firm Productivity Growth // Small Business Economy. 2010. Vol. 34. Pp. 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9110-5
84. Roper S., Du J., Love J.H. Modelling the Innovation Value Chain // Research Policy. 2008. Vol. 37. Issue 6–7. Pp. 961–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.005
85. Roud V. Firm-Level Research on Innovation and Productivity: Russian Experience. 2007. 10 p. URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.596.8971&rep=rep1&type=pdf (дата обращения: апрель 2022).
86. Santi C., Santoleri P. Exploring the Link between Innovation and Growth in Chilean Firms // Small Business Economics. 2017. Vol. 49. Pp. 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9836-4
87. Sapprasert K., Clausen T. Organizational Innovation and Its Effects // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2012. Vol. 21. Issue 5. Pp. 1283–1305. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts023
88. Schmidt T., Rammer C. Non-Technological and Technological Innovation: Strange Bedfellows? / ZEW. Discussion Paper. No. 07-052. 2007. 47 p. URL: https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/1624/1/dp07052.pdf (дата обращения: апрель 2022).
89. Segarra-Blasco A. Innovation and Productivity in Manufacturing and Service Firms in Catalonia: A Regional Approach // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2010. Vol. 19. Issue 3. Pp. 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590802469594
90. Siedschlag I., Zhang X., Cahill B. The Effects of the Internationalization of Firms on Innovation and Productivity / ESRI. Working Paper. No. 363. 2010. 56 p. URL: https://www.esri.ie/system/files?file=media/file-uploads/2015-07/WP363.pdf (дата обращения: май 2022).
91. Tello M. Innovation and Productivity in Services and Manufacturing Firms: The Case of Peru // CEPAL Review. 2017. No.121. Pp. 69–86. https://doi.org/10.18356/A4C7EEA5-EN
92. Teplykh G. Analysis of the Innovation Activities of Firms Using the CDM Approach // Problems of Economic Transition. 2016. Vol. 58. Issue 5. Pp. 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611991.2016.1225449
93. Teplykh G.V. Innovations and Productivity: The Shift during the 2008 Crisis // Industry and Innovation. 2018. Vol. 25. Issue 1. Pp. 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1286461
94. Tether B.S. Do Services Innovate (Differently)? Insights from the European Innobarometer Survey // Industry and Innovation. 2005. Vol. 12. Issue 2. Pp. 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500087891
95. Tether B.S. Small and Large Firms: Sources of Unequal Innovations? // Research Policy. 1998. Vol. 27. Issue 7. Pp. 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00079-1
96. Vakhitova G., Pavlenko T. Innovation and Productivity: A Firm Level Study of Ukrainian Manufacturing Sector / KEI. Discussion Paper Series. No. 27. 2010. 30 p. URL: http://repec.kse.org.ua/pdf/KSE_dp27.pdf (дата обращения: июнь 2022).
97. Wadho W., Chaudhry A. Innovation and Firm Performance in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistani Textile and Apparel Manufacturers // Research Policy. 2018. Vol. 47. Issue 7. Pp. 1283–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.007
98. Zahler A., Iacovone L., Mattoo A. Trade and Innovation in Services: Evidence from a Developing Economy // The World Economy. 2014. Vol. 37. Issue 7. Pp. 953–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12117
Поступила в редакцию 30.06.2022
Одобрена после рецензирования 08.07.2022
Принята к публикации 19.08.2022
Доступно онлайн 26.12.2022

ISSN (Print) - 1815-9834
ISSN (Online) 2587-5957

Главный редактор
Павел Александрович Минакир
Тел. +7 (4212) 725-225,
факс +7 (4212) 225-916,

 

Ответственный секретарь
Людмила Альфредовна Самохина
Тел. +7 (4212) 226-053,
факс +7 (4212) 225-916,
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Редакция журнала
Тел. +7 (4212) 226-053,
факс +7 (4212) 225-916,
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Институт экономических
исследований ДВО РАН.
(редакция журнала
"Пространственная экономика")
ул. Тихоокеанская, 153, Хабаровск,
Россия, 680042

 

 

Лицензия Creative Commons
Если не указано другое, контент этого сайта доступен по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.

ИЭИ ДВО РАН