Научный журнал "Пространственная экономика" - Изотов Д.А. Новая экономическая география: границы возможностей

Раздел	Обзоры
Заглавие	Новая экономическая география: границы возможностей
Страницы	123-160
Автор 1	Изотов Дмитрий Александрович кандидат экономических наук, старший научный сотрудник Институт экономических исследований ДВО РАН ул. Тихоокеанская, 153, Хабаровск, Россия, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Аннотация	В статье анализируются научные публикации, имеющие отношение к новой экономической географии (НЭГ). Анализ сформированного массива публикаций показал, что моделирование в рамках НЭГ основывается на подходе общего равновесия в условиях монополистической конкуренции, эндогенности факторов и однородного пространства. Выявлено, что центральная идея НЭГ может быть представлена следующим образом: возрастающая экономия от масштаба является главной силой перемещения факторов производства в однородном пространстве. В ходе анализа теоретических работ было выявлено, что развитие моделей НЭГ осуществляется за счет как рассмотрения различных вариантов миграционного поведения субъектов агломерационного процесса, так и включения теоретических конструкций из смежных областей, в частности, теории нового экономического роста и моделей городской экономики. Анализ эмпирических работ показал преимущественное тестирование положений НЭГ в рамках модели «ядро – периферия». Крайне редкие случаи тестирования других моделей НЭГ. Систематизация критических замечаний со стороны научного сообщества позволила выявить основные проблемы НЭГ: идентификация в системе социально-экономических знаний, игнорирование пространственных характеристик, ограниченность объекта исследования, простота исходных предпосылок, проблемы с эмпирическими подтверждениями.
УДК	330
DOI	10.14530/se.2013.3.123-160
Ключевые слова	Новая экономическая география ♦ возрастающая экономия от масштаба ♦ монополистическая конкуренция ♦ факторы производства ♦ общее равновесие ♦ транспортные издержки ♦ агломерационный процесс ♦ эластичность замещения ♦ миграционное поведение ♦ критика новой экономической географии ♦ теоретические и эмпирические исследования
Скачать	SE.2013.3.123-160.Izotov.pdf
Для цитирования	Изотов Д.А. Новая экономическая география: границы возможностей // Пространственная экономика. 2013. № 3 С. 123-160. DOI: 10.14530/se.2013.3.123-160
Ссылки	1. Лакатос И. Избранные произведения по философии и методологии науки / Пер. с англ. И.Н. Веселовского, А.Л. Никифорова, В.Н. Поруса. М.: Академический Проект; Трикоста, 2008. 475 с. 2. Маршалл А. Принципы политической экономии. Т. 1–3 / Пер. с англ. М.: Прогресс, 1993. 994 с. 3. Маршалл А. Принципы политической экономии. Т. II / Пер. с англ. М.: Прогресс, 1984. 311 с. 4. Рычков О.А., Шевяхова Е.Ю. Изменение региональной структуры производства в России в переходный период с позиций «новой экономической географии». М.: EERC, 2004. 44 с. 5. Чемберлин Э.Х. Теория монополистической конкуренции. М., 1959. 403 с. 6. Ago T., Isono I., Tabuchi T. Locational Disadvantage of the Hub // The Annals of Regional Science. 2006. Vol. 40. Pp. 819–848. 7. Amiti M., Pissarides C.A. Trade and Industrial Location with Heterogeneous Labor // Journal of International Economics. 2005. Vol. 67. Pp. 392–412. 8. Andres F. Divergence, Wage-Gap and Geography // Economie Internationale. 2006. № 108. Pp. 108–109. 9. Armington P.S. A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Produ-ction // Staff Papers - International Monetary Fund. 1969. Vol. 16. № 1. Pp. 159–179. 10. Arnott R., Wrigley N. Editorial // Journal of Economic Geography. 2001. Vol. 1. Pp. 1–4. 11. Arrow K.J., Debreu G. Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy // Econometrica. 1954. Vol. 22. № 3. Pp. 265–290. 12. Baldwin R., Forslid R. The Core-Periphery Model and Endogenous Growth: Stabilizing and De-stabilizing Integration // Economica. 2000. Vol. 67. Pp. 307–324. 13. Baldwin R., Martin Ph. Agglomeration and Regional Growth, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics // Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. 2004. Pp. 2671–2711. 14. Baldwin R., Martin Ph., Ottaviano G. Global Income Divergence, Trade, and Industrialization: The Geography of Growth Take-Offs // Journal of Economic Growth. 2001. Vol. 6. Pp. 5–37. 15. Baldwin R., Okubo T. Heterogeneous Firms, Agglomeration and Economic Geography: Spatial Selection and Sorting // Journal of Economic Geography. 2006. Vol. 6. № 3. Pp. 323–346. 16. Baldwin R., Robert-Nicoud F. Trade and Growth with Heterogeneous Firms // Journal of International Economics. 2008. Vol. 74. № 1. Pp. 21–34. 17. Barnes T.J. The Rise (and Decline) of American Regional Science: Lessons for the New Economic Geography? // Journal of Economic Geography. 2004. Vol. 4. Pp. 107–129. 18. Behrens K. On The Location and Lock-In of Cities: Geography vs. Transportation Technology // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2007. Vol. 37. Pp. 22–45. 19. Behrens K., Gaigne C., Ottaviano G., Thisse J.-F. Countries, Regions and Trade: On the Welfare Impacts of Economic Integration // European Economic Review. 2007. Vol. 51. Pp. 1277–1301. 20. Behrens K., Robert-Nicoud F. Krugman’s Papers in Regional Science: The 100 Dollar Bill on the Sidewalk Is Gone And the 2008 Nobel Prize Well-Deserved // Papers in Regional Science. 2009. Vol. 85. № 2. Pp. 467–489. 21. Behrens K., Robert-Nicoud F. Tempora Mutantur: In Search Of A New Testament for NEG // Journal of Economic Geography. 2011. Vol. 11. Pp. 215–230. 22. Bellone F., Maupertuis M. Economic Integration and Regional Income Inequalities: Competing Dynamics of Regional Wages and Innovative Capabilities // Review of International Economics. 2003. Vol. 11. № 3. Pp. 512–526. 23. Bertoletti P., Fumagalli E., Poletti C. On Price-Increasing (Monopolistic) Competition. May 2008. URL: http://economia.unipv.it/eco-pol/PaperSeminari/competition_bertoletti.pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2013). 24. Bode E., Mutl J. Testing Nonlinear New Economic Geography Models. July 2010. Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna. URL: http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/eco/es-253.pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2013). 25. Bosker M., Brakman S., Garretsen H., Schramm M. Adding Geography to the New Economic Geography: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirics // Journal of Economic Geography. 2010. Vol. 10. № 6. Pp. 793–823. 26. Bosker M., Brakman S., Garretsen H., Schramm M. Looking for Multiple Equilibria When Geography Matters: German City Growth and the WWII Shock // Journal of Urban Economics. 2007. Vol. 61. Pp. 152–169. 27. Brakman S., Garretsen H. New Economic Geography: Closing the Gap between Theory and Empirics // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2006. Vol. 36. Pp. 569–572. 28. Brakman S., Garretsen H. Rethinking the ‘New’ Geographical Economics // Regional Studies. 2003. Vol. 37. № 6&7. Pp. 637–648. 29. Brakman S., Garretsen H., Gorter J., Horst A., Schramm M. New Economic Geography, Empirics, and Regional Policy. 2005. URL: http://www.cpb.nl/en/publication/new-economic-geography-empirics-and-regional-policy (дата обращения: 29.05.2013). 30. Brakman S., Garretsen H., Schramm M. New Economic Geography in Germany: Testing the Helpman-Hanson Model. HWWA Discussion Paper 172. 2002. URL: http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/230295282 (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 31. Brakman S., Garretsen H., Schramm M. Putting New Economic Geography to the Test: Free-Ness of Trade and Agglomeration in the EU Regions // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2006. Vol. 36. Pp. 613–635. 32. Cerina F., Mureddu F. Is Agglomeration Really Good For Growth? Global Efficiency and Interregional Equity. CRENoS working papers. 2009 / 13. URL: http://crenos.unica.it/crenos/node/2449 (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 33. Christ J.P. New Economic Geography Reloaded: Localized Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation. FZID Discussion Papers. № 01-2009. URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/27758/1/594803381.PDF (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 34. Corpataux J., Crevoisier O. Economic Theories and Spatial Transformations: Clarifying the Space-Time Premises and Outcomes of Economic Theories // Journal of Economic Geography. 2007. Vol. 7. Pp. 285–310. 35. Currie M., Kubin I. Chaos in the Core-Periphery Model // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2006. Vol. 60. Pp. 252–275. 36. Davis D.R., Weinstein D.E. A Search for Multiple Equilibria in Urban Industrial Structure // Journal of Regional Science. 2008. Vol. 48. № 1. Pp. 29–65. 37. De Bruyne K. The Location of Economic Activity: First versus Second Nature Core-Periphery Theories // Tijdschrift vor Economie en Management. 2006. Vol. LI. № 1. Pp.75–104. 38. Dixit A.K., Stiglitz J.E. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity // American Economic Review. 1977. Vol. 67. № 3. Pp. 297–308. 39. Fallah B.N., Partridge M.D., Olfert M.R. New Economic Geography and US Metropolitan Wage Inequality // Journal of Economic Geography. 2011. Vol. 11. Pp. 865–895. 40. Fingleton B. The Empirical Performance of the NEG with Reference to Small Areas // Journal of Economic Geography. 2011. Vol. 11. Pp. 267–279. 41. Fingleton B., Fischer M.M. Neoclassical Theory versus New Economic Geography. Competing Explanations of Cross-Regional Variation in Economic Development // The Annals of Regional Science. 2010. Vol. 44. № 3. Pp. 467–491. 42. Florax R., Vlist A.J. Spatial Econometric Data Analysis: Moving beyond Traditional Models // International Regional Science Review. 2003. Vol. 26. № 3. Pp. 223–243. 43. Fujita M. A Monopolistic Competition Model of Spatial Agglomeration: Differentiated Product Approach // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 1988. Vol. 18. Pp. 87–124. 44. Fujita M. Thunen and the New Economic Geography // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2012. Vol. 42. Pp. 907–912. 45. Fujita M., Gokan T. On the Evolution of the Spatial Economy with Multi-unit Multi-plant Firms: The Impact of IT Development. Institute of Developing Economies. Discussion Paper № 16. November 2004. URL: http://ir.ide.go.jp/dspace/bitstream/2344/190/3/ARRIDE_Discussion_№16_fujita.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 46. Fujita M., Mori T. Frontiers of the New Economic Geography // Papers in Regional Science. 2005. Vol. 84. № 3. Pp. 377–405. 47. Fujita M., Thisse J.-F. Does Geographical Agglomeration Foster Economic Growth? And Who Gains and Loses From It? // The Japanese Economic Review. 2003. Vol. 54. Pp. 121–145. 48. Fujita M., Thisse J.-F. Economics of Agglomeration // Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 1996. Vol. 10. Pp. 339–378. 49. Fujita M., Thisse J.-F. Globalization and the Evolution of the Supply Chain: Who Gains and Who Loses? // International Economic Review. 2006. Vol. 47. № 3. Pp. 811–836. 50. Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A.J. The Spatial Economy. Cities, Regions, and International Trade. MIT-Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1999. 367 p. 51. Garretsen H., Martin R. Rethinking (New) Economic Geography Models: Taking Geography and History More Seriously // Spatial Economic Analysis. 2010. Vol. 5. Pp. 127–160. 52. Handbury J., Weinstein D.E. Is New Economic Geography Right? Evidence from Price Data. NBER Working Paper. № 17067. May 2011. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w17067.pdf?new_window=1 (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 53. Hanson G.H. Market Potential, Returns, and Geographic Concentration. NBER Working paper series. Working paper 6429. 1998. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w6429.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 54. Hanson G.H. Scale Economies and the Geographic Concentration of Industry // Journal of Economic Geography. 2001. Vol. 1. Pp. 255–276. 55. Head K., Mayer T. The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade (Chapter 59) // Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. 2004. Vol. 4. Pp. 2610–2669. 56. Head K., Ries J. Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of U.S.-Canada trade // American Economic Review. 2001. Vol. 91. № 4. Pp. 858–876. 57. Helpman E. The Size of Regions. Working Paper № 14–95. 1995. The Foerder Institute for Economic Research. URL: http://econ.tau.ac.il/papers/foerder/14-95.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 58. Henderson J.V. The Sizes and Types of Cities // The American Economic Review. 1974. Vol. 64. № 4. Pp. 640–656. 59. Hering L., Poncet S. The Impact of Economic Geography on Wages: Disentangling the Channels of Influence // China Economic Review. 2009. Vol. 20. № 1. Pp. 1–14. 60. Hoare T. Book review «Geography and Trade. P. Krugman» // Regional Studies. 1992. Vol. 26. № 7. Pp. 679–680. 61. Isserman A.M. «It`s Obvious, It›s Wrong, and Anyway They Said It Years Ago»? Paul Krugman on Large Cities // International Regional Science Review. 1996. Vol. 19. № 1&2. Pp. 37–48. 62. Isserman A.M. Lost in Space? On The History, Status, and Future of Regional Science // Review of Regional Studies. 1993. Vol. 23. Pp. 1–50. 63. Kancs A. The Economic Geography of Labour Migration: Competition, Competitiveness and Development // Applied Geography. 2011. Vol. 31. Pp. 191–200. 64. Krugman P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography // The Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99. № 3. Pp. 483–499. 65. Krugman P. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade // Journal of International Economics. 1979. Vol. 9. Pp. 469–479. 66. Krugman P. Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from Trade // Journal of Political Economy. 1981. Vol. 89. № 5. Pp. 959–973. 67. Krugman P. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade // American Economic Review. 1980. Vol. 70. № 5. Pp. 950–959. 68. Krugman P. Space: The Final Frontier // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1998. Vol. 12. № 2. Pp. 161–174. 69. Krugman P. What’s New about the New Economic Geography? // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 1998. Vol. 14. № 2. Pp. 7–17. 70. Krugman P., Venables A.J. Globalization and the Inequality of Nations // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1995. Vol. 110. № 4. Pp. 857–880. 71. Martin Ph., Ottaviano G. Growing Locations: Industry Location in a Model of Endogenous Growth // European Economic Review. 1999. Vol. 43. Pp. 281–302. 72. Martin Ph., Rogers C.A. Industrial Location and Public Infrastructure // Journal of International Economics. 1995. Vol. 39. Pp. 335–351. 73. Martin R. Editorial: The ‹New Economic Geography›: Challenge or Irrelevance? // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series. 1999. Vol. 24. № 4. Pp. 387–391. 74. Martin R. The New ‹Geographical Turn› in Economics: Some Critical Reflections // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1999. Vol. 23. № 1. Pp. 65–91. 75. Martin R., Sunley P. Paul Krugman›s Geographical Economics and Its Implications for Regional Development Theory: A Critical Assessment // Economic Geography. 1996. Vol. 72. № 3. Pp. 259–292. 76. Matsuyama K., Takahashi T. Self-Defeating Regional Concentration // Review of Economic Studies. 1998. Vol. 65. Pp. 211–234. 77. McCann Ph. Transport Costs and New Economic Geography // Journal of Economic Geography. 2005. Vol. 5. Pp. 305–318. 78. Melitz M. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Re-allocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity // Econometrica. 2003. Vol. 71. № 6. Pp. 1695–1725. 79. Mori T., Turrini A. Skills, Agglomeration, and Segmentation // European Economic Review. 2005. Vol. 49. Pp. 201–225. 80. Mossay P. A Theory of Rational Spatial Agglomerations // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2013. Vol. 43. № 2. Pp. 385–394. 81. Murata Y. Product Diversity, Taste Heterogeneity, and Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: Market vs. Non-Market Interactions // Journal of Urban Economics. 2003. Vol. 53. Pp. 126–144. 82. Mureddu F. Essays in New Economic Geography. A Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Social and Economic Research. University of Cagliari. March 2009. URL: http://veprints.unica.it/480/1/f_mureddu_td.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 83. Myrdal G. Economic Theory and Under-developed Regions. London: Duckworth, 1957. 84. Neary J.P. Of Hype and Hyperbolas: Introducing the New Economic Geography // Journal of Economic Literature. 2001. Vol. 39. № 2. Pр. 536–561. 85. Olsen J. On the Units of Geographical Economics // Geoforum. 2002. Vol. 33. Pp. 153–164. 86. Ottaviano G. ‘New’ New Economic Geography: Firm Heterogeneity and Agglomeration Economies // Journal of Economic Geography. 2011. Vol. 11. Pp. 231–240. 87. Ottaviano G. Models of ’New Economic Geography’: Factor Mobility vs. Vertical Linkages. Mimeo, Graduate Institute of International Studies, 2002. 88. Ottaviano G. Monopolistic Competition, Trade, and Endogenous Spatial Fluctuations. CEPR Discussion Paper. №1327. 1996. URL: http://www2.dse.unibo.it/wp/240.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 89. Ottaviano G., Tabuchi T., Thisse J.-F. Agglomeration and Trade Revisited // International Economic Review. 2002. Vol. 43. № 2. Pp. 409–435. 90. Ottaviano G., Thisse J.-F. New Economic Geography: what about the N? 2004. URL: http://time.dufe.edu.cn/wencong/thisse/paper5.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 91. Ottaviano G., Thisse J.-F. On Economic Geography in Economic Theory: Increasing Returns and Pecuniary Externalities. 9 March 2000. URL: http://istituti.unicatt.it/teoria_economica_metodi_quantitativi_11aprilejeg1222.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 92. Overman H.G., Redding S., Venables A.J. The Economic Geography of Trade, Production, and Income: A Survey of Empirics. London School of Economics and CEPR. 2001. URL: http://www.crei.cat/conferences/Workshop_on_Macro_and_Micro_Aspects_of_Economic_Geography_/activities/ sc_conferences/13/redding.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 93. Oyama D. Agglomeration under Forward-Looking Expectations: Potentials and Global Stability // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2009. Vol. 39. Pp. 696–713. 94. Pfluger M., Sudekum J. A Synthesis of Footloose-Entrepreneur New Economic Geography Models: When Is Agglomeration Smooth and Easily Reversible? // Journal of Economic Geography. 2008. Vol. 8. Pp. 39–54. 95. Puga D., Venables A.J. The Spread of Industry: Spatial Agglomeration in Economic Development // Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 1996. Vol. 10. № 4. Pp. 440–464. 96. Quigley J. Urban Diversity and Economic Growth // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1998. Vol. 12. № 2. Pp. 127–138. 97. Redding S.J. The Empirics of New Economic Geography // Journal of Regional Science. 2010. Vol. 50. № 1. Pp. 297–311. 98. Robert-Nicoud F. The structure of simple ‘New Economic Geography’ models (or, On identical twins) // Journal of Economic Geography. 2005. Vol. 5. Pp. 201–234. 99. Rodriguez-Pose A. Economists as Geographers and Geographers as Something Else: On the Changing Conception of Distance in Geography and Economics // Journal of Economic Geography. 2011. Vol. 11. Pp. 347–356. 100. Rosenthal S., Strange W. Evidence on the Nature and Sources of Agglomeration Economies. Prepared for the Handbook of Urban And Regional Economics, Volume 4. November 4, 2002. URL: http://spol.unica.it/didattica/paci/Economia applicata avanzata %281mod%29/Rosenthal-Strange H.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 101. Samuelson P.A. Transfer Problem and the Transport Cost, II: Analysis of Effects of Trade Impediments // Economic Journal. 1954. Vol. 64. № 254. Pp. 264–289. 102. Schmutzler A. The New Economic Geography // Journal of Economic Surveys. 1999. Vol. 13. № 4. Pp. 355–379. 103. Scitovsky T. Two Concepts of External Economies // Journal of Political Economy. 1954. Vol. 62. № 2. Pp. 143–151. 104. Sheppard E. How ‘Economists’ Think: About Geography, For Example // Journal of Economic Geography. 2001. Vol. 1. Pp. 131–136. 105. Simonis D. The New Economic Geography: a Survey of the Literature. Federal Planning Bureau Economic Analyses and Forecasts. Working Paper 16-02. Brussels. December 2002. URL: http://www.plan.be/admin/uploaded/200605091448041.WP0216en.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 106. Starrett D. Market Allocations of Location Choice in a Model with Free Mobility // Journal of Economic Theory. 1978. Vol. 17. Pp. 21–37. 107. Sunley P. What’s behind the models? A review of The Spatial Economy // Journal of Economic Geography. 2001. Vol. 1. Pp. 136–139. 108. Tabuchi T. Does New Economic Geography Faithfully Describe Reality? RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-E-071. October 2012. URL: http://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/12e071.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 109. Tabuchi T., Thisse J.-F. A New Economic Geography Model of Central Places // Journal of Urban Economics. 2011. Vol. 69. Pp. 240–252. 110. Tabuchi T., Thisse J.-F. Taste Heterogeneity, Labor Mobility and Economic Geography // Journal of Development Economics. 2002. Vol. 69. Pp. 155–177. 111. Vanbergen B. Dynamics of Some New Economic Geography Models. Universiteit Gent, Faculty of Economics and Applied Economics, Department of General Economics Research paper. 2005. URL: http://www.feb.ugent.be/algeco/regio/full papers/bertvanbergen.pdf (дата обращения: 15.03.2013). 112. Venables A.J. Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries // International Economic Review. 1996. Vol. 37. № 2. Pp. 341–359. 113. Yamamoto K. A Two-Region Model with Two Types of Manufacturing Technologies and Agglomeration // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2005. Vol. 35. № 6.
Финансирование
Дата поступления