Раздел | Обзоры |
Заглавие | Эмпирические модели общего экономического равновесия |
Страницы | 138-167 |
Автор 1 | Изотов Дмитрий Александрович кандидат экономических наук, старший научный сотрудник Институт экономических исследований ДВО РАН ул. Тихоокеанская, 153, Хабаровск, Россия, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
Аннотация | В статье рассмотрены возможности и ограничения эмпирических моделей общего экономического равновесия, произведена их классификация. Модели вычислимого общего равновесия разделены на две группы: первая группа основана на модели равновесных цен (подход Г. Скарфа), вторая - на мультиотраслевой модели экономического роста (подход Л. Йохансена). Модели динамического стохастического общего равновесия также разделены на две группы: первая группа основана на модели реального бизнес-цикла (подход Ф. Кидланда и Э. Прескотта), вторая - на модели различного поведения фирм в условиях монополистической конкуренции (подход Дж. Ротемберга и М. Вудфорда). В рамках каждой группы произведено разграничение эмпирических моделей по следующим критериям: масштаб экономики, ее открытость; применение для текущих и перспективных оценок; исследуемое социально-экономическое явление. |
УДК | 330.36.01 |
DOI | 10.14530/se.2014.3.138-167 |
Ключевые слова | Классификация ♦ общее экономическое равновесие ♦ модель прикладного общего равновесия ♦ модель вычислимого общего равновесия ♦ модель динамического стохастического общего равновесия ♦ Байесовский подход ♦ внешний шок |
Скачать | SE.2014.3.138-167.Izotov.pdf |
Для цитирования | Изотов Д.А. Эмпирические модели общего экономического равновесия // Пространственная экономика. 2014. № 3 С. 138-167. |
Ссылки | 1. Блауг М. Экономическая мысль в ретроспективе / пер. с англ., 4-е изд. М.: «Дело Лтд», 1994. 720 с. 2. Вальрас Л. Элементы чистой политической экономии. М.: Изограф, 2000. 448 с. 3. Макаров В.Л. Вычислимая модель российской экономики. Препринт # WP/99/069. М.: ЦЭМИ РАН, 1999. 93 с. 4. Полбин А.В., Дробышевский С.М. Построение динамической стохастической модели общего равновесия для российской экономики. М.: Издательство Института Гайдара, 2014. 156 с. 5. Полтерович В.М. Кризис экономической теории // Экономическая наука современной России. 1998. № 1. С. 46–66. 6. Разработка методологии количественного анализа влияния внешнеэкономи-ческих договоров и соглашений на параметры внешнеэкономической деятельности и международной конкурентноспособности российской экономики: Отчет о НИР/ ЦЭФИР. М., 2006. 162 с. URL: http://aisup.economy.gov.ru/niokr/materials.jsp?uuid=pprtctfs000080000hckv7cqoc4fn2v8 (дата обращения: 10.07.2014). 7. Adolfson M., Laseen S., Jesper L., Villani M. Are Constant Interest Rate Forecasts Modest Interventions? Evidence from an Estimated Open Economy DSGE Model of the Euro Area. Sveriges Riksbank. Working Paper Series 180. URL: 8. Agenor P.R., Izquierdo A., Fofack H. IMMPA: A Quantitative Macroeconomic Framework for the Analysis of Poverty Reduction Strategies. The World Bank Washington D.C. June 3, 2003. URL: 9. Aguiar A.H., Walmsley T.L. A Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of International Migration. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University. 2010. 27 с. URL: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/5053.pdf (дата обращения: 05.07.2014). 10. Alekseev A. An Application of a Computable General Equilibrium Model for the Estimation of Effects of the New Wave of the European Union Enlargement on the Russian Economy. Working Paper #BSP/2003/070. Moscow, New Economic School, 2003. 11. p. URL: 12. Andrle M., Hledik T., Kamenik O., Vlcek J. Implementing the New Structural Model of the Czech National Bank. Working Paper 2009/2. Czech National Bank, Research Department, 2009. URL: 13. Armington P.S. A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production // Staff Papers – International Monetary Fund. 1969. Vol. 16. No. 1. Pp. 159–178. 14. Arrow K.J., Debreu G. Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy // Econometrica. 1954. Vol. 22. No. 3. Pp. 265–290. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1907353 (дата обращения: 15.08.2014). 15. Baldos U.L.C., Hertel T.W. Development of a GTAP8 Land Use and Land Cover Data Base for Years 2004 and 2007. GTAP Research Memorandum. No. 23. September, 2012. URL: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/6048.pdf (дата обращения: 18.05.2014). 16. Bchir M.H., Decreux Y., Guerin J.L., Jean S. MIRAGE, a Computable General Equilibrium Model for Trade Policy Analysis. Working Paper. No. 2002. CEPII. December, 2002. URL: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/1256.pdf (дата обращения: 12.07.2014). 17. Benes J., Binning A., Fukac M., Lees K., Matheson T. K.I.T.T.: Kiwi Inflation Targeting Technology, New Zealand / Reserve Bank of New Zealand, 2009. URL: 18. Bondareva O. The Core of an N Person Game // Vestnik Leningrad University. 1962. Vol. 17. No. 13. Pp. 141–142. 19. Borges A.M. Applied General Equilibrium Models: An Assessment of their Usefulness for Policy Analysis. URL: 20. Brouwer L.E.J. Uber Eineindeutige, Stetige Transformationen von Flachen in Sich // Mathematische Annalen. 1910. Vol. 69. Pp. 176–180. 21. Brubakk L., Husebo T.A., Maih J., Olsen K., Ostnor M. Finding NEMO: Documentation of the Norwegian Economy Model. Staff Memo 2006/6. Norges Bank. Oslo, 2006. URL: 22. Burgess S., Fernandez-Corugedo E., Groth C., Harrison R., Monti F., Theodoridis K., Waldron M. The Bank of England’s Forecasting Platform: COMPASS, MAPS, EASE and the Suite of Models. Working Paper 471. Bank of England. May, 2013. URL: 23. Cantore C., Leon-Ledesma M., McAdam P., Willman A. Shocking Stuff: Technology, Hours, and Factor Substitution. Working Paper 1278. European Central Bank, 2010. URL: 24. 20.03.2014). 25. Caputo R., Medina J.P., Soto C. The MAS: a DSGE Model for Chile Implementation and Forecasting / Central Bank of Chile / Structural Dynamic Macroeconomic Models in Asia Pacific Economies, Bali, Indonesia, 3–4 June 2008. URL: 26. Chappuis T., Walmsley T.L. Projections for World CGE Model Baselines. GTAP Research Memorandum. No. 22. September, 2011. URL: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/5625.pdf (дата обращения: 15.05.2014). 27. Christoffel K., Coenen G., Warne A. The New Area-Wide Model of the Euro Area – a Micro-Founded Open-Economy Model for Forecasting and Policy Analysis. Working Paper 944. European Central Bank, 2008. URL: 28. Chung H.T., Kiley M.T., Laforte J.-P. Documentation of the Estimated, Dynamic, Optimization-based (EDO) Model of the U.S. Economy: 2010 Version. Finance and Economics Discussion Series Working Paper 2010-29. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2010. URL: 29. Danielsson A., Eliasson L., Gudmundsson M.F., Hauksson B.A., Jonsdottir R., Olafsson T.T., Petursson T.G. QMM: A Quarterly Macroeconomic Model of the Icelandic Economy. Working Papers 32. Central Bank of Iceland. December, 2006. URL: http://www.sedlabanki.is/lisalib/getfile.aspx?itemid=4910 (дата обращения: 16.04.2014). 30. Dantzig G.B. Optimal Solution of a Dynamic Leontief Model with Substitution // Econometrica. 1955. Vol. 23. No. 3. Pp. 295–302. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1910385 (дата обращения:: 18.04.2014). 31. Decreux Y., Valin H. MIRAGE, Updated Version of the Model for Trade Policy Analysis Focus on Agriculture and Dynamics / CEPII , France. October, 2007. URL: 32. Devarajan S., Go D.S. A Macroeconomic Framework for Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: With an Application to Zambia. Africa Region. World Boor. Working Paper Series. No. 38. October, 2002. URL: 33. Dorich J., Johnston M., Mendes R., Murchison S., Zhang Y. ToTEM II: An Updated Version of the Bank of Canada’s Quarterly Projection Model. Technical Report 100 / Canadian Economic Analysis Department. Bank of Canada. October, 2013. URL: 34. Estrada G., Park D., Park I., Park S. ASEAN’s Free Trade Agreements with the People’s Republic of China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. ADB. Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration No. 75. March, 2011. URL: 35. Estrada G., Park D., Park I., Park S. The PRC’s Free Trade Agreements with ASEAN, Japan, and the Republic of Korea: A Comparative Analysis. ADB. Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration. No. 92. January, 2012. URL: 36. Fernandez-Villaverde J. The Econometrics of DSGE Models. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper. No. 14677. January, 2009. URL: 37. Florian D., Montoro C. Development of MEGA-D: A DSGE Model for Policy Analysis / Banco Central de Reserva del Peru (BCRP). May, 2009. URL: https://www.frbatlanta.org/news/CONFEREN/09qampoe/montoro.pdf (дата обращения: 17.06.2014). 38. Foure J., Benassy-Quere A., Fontagne L. The World Economy in 2050: a Tentative Picture. CEPII Working paper 2010-27. 2010. URL: 39. Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP). URL: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu (дата обращения: 15.06.2014). 40. Graeve F. The External Finance Premium and the Macroeconomy: US post-WWII Evidence // Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control. 2008. Vol. 32. No. 11. Pp. 3415–3440. 41. Harberger A.C. The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax // Journal of Political Economy. 1962. Vol. 70. No. 3. Pp. 215–240. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1828856 (дата обращения: 21.07.2014). 42. Harrison R., Nikolov K., Quinn M., Ramsay G., Scott A., Thomas R. The Bank of England Quarterly Model / Bank of England, London. 2005. URL: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/beqm (дата обращения: 14.05.2014). 43. Horridge M. ORANI-G: A Generic Single-Country Computable General Equilibrium Model. Centre of Policy Studies and Impact Project / Monash University, Australia. 2003. URL: 44. Ianchovichina E., Ivanic M., Martin W. Implications of the Growth of China and India for the Other Asian Giant: Russia. Policy Research. Working Paper, no. 5075. October, 2009. URL: http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-5075 (дата обращения: 18.07.2014). 45. Ianchovichina E., Ivanic M., Martin W. Implications of the Growth of China and India for the Middle East and North Africa. URL: 46. Ianchovichina E., Nicita A., Soloaga I. Trade Reform and Household Welfare: the Case of Mexico. Policy Research. Working Paper WPS2667. August, 2001. URL: 47. Johansen L. A Multi-Sectoral Study of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: North Holland, 2nd enlarged ed., 1974. 274 с. 48. Johnson H. Optimum Tariffs and Retaliation // Review of Economic Studies. 1953. Vol. 21. No. 2. Pp. 142–153. 49. Kawai M., Wignaraja G. Asian FTAs: Trends, Prospects, and Challenges. ADB Economics Working Paper Series, no. 226. October, 2010. URL: 50. Kiyota K., Stern R.M. Economic Effects of a Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. Korea Economic Institute. 2007. 63 p. URL: 51. Kumhof M., Laxton D., Muir D., Mursula S. The Global Integrated Monetary and Fiscal Model (GIMF) – Theoretical Structure. IMF Working Paper 10/34. 2010. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp1034.pdf (дата обращения: 26.04.2014). 52. Kydland F.E., Prescott E.C. Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations // Econometrica. 1982. Vol. 50. No. 6. Pp. 1345–1370. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913386 (дата обращения: 11.07.2014). 53. Li C., Whalley J. Rebalancing and the Chinese VAT: Some Numerical Simulation Results // China Economic Review. 2012. Vol. 23. No. 2. Pp. 316–324. 54. Li X., Xu D. Impact of RMB Appreciation on Trade and Labor Markets of China and the USA: A Multi-Country Comparative General Equilibrium Model // China & World Economy. 2011. Vol. 19. No. 2. Pp. 19–39. 55. Lofgren H., Harris R.L., Robinson S. A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model in GAMS / International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, D.C. 2002. URL: 56. Manchin M. The Economic Effects of a Russian-EU FTA. Tinbergen Institute. Discussion Paper TI 2004-131/2. URL: 57. Mertens K., Ravn M.O. Understanding the Aggregate Effects of Anticipated and Unanticipated tax Policy Shocks // Review of Economic Dynamics. 2011. Vol. 14. No. 1. Pp. 27–54. 58. Mikusheva A. Estimation of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models // Quantile. 2014. No. 12. Pp. 1–21. URL: 59. Minor P., Walmsley T. MyGTAP Data Program: A Program for Customizing and Extending the GTAP Database. GTAP Working Paper. No. 79. 2013. URL: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/6660.pdf (дата обращения: 02.05.2014). 60. Murchison S., Rennison A. ToTEM: The Bank of Canada’s New Quarterly Projection Model. Technical Report 97 / Bank of Canada, 2006. URL: 61. Paltsev S., Rutherford T., Zemnitsky A. Assessment of Marginal Excess Burden of Taxation Based on a CGE Model / Department of Economics, University of Colorado, 2000, mimeo (in Russian). URL: 62. Park C.Y., Zhai F. Asia’s Imprint on Global Commodity Markets. ERD Working Paper. No. 90. December, 2006. URL: 63. Pesenti P. The Global Economy Model: Theoretical Framework // IMF Staff Papers. 2008. Vol. 55. No. 2. Pp. 243–284. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/staffp/2008/02/pdf/pesenti.pdf (дата обращения: 19.04.2014). 64. Plummer M.G., Cheong D., Hamanaka S. Methodology for Impact Assessment of Free Trade Agreements. Mandaluyong City, Philippines / Asian Development Bank, 2010. 110 p. 65. Rattso J. Different Macroclosures of the Original Johansen Model and their Impact on Policy Evaluation // Journal of Policy Modeling. 1982. Vol. 4. No. 1. Pp. 85–97. 66. Robilliard A.S., Bourguignon F., Robinson S. Crisis and Income Distribution: A Micro-Macro Model for Indonesia. June, 2001. 67. Rotemberg J.J., Woodford M. An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy: Expanded Version. NBER Technical Working Paper 233. May, 1998. URL: 68. Rutherford T., Tarr D. Regional Impacts of Russia’s Accession to the WTO / World Bank. June, 2006. URL: 69. Scarf H. Fixed-Point Theorems and Economic Analysis // American Scientist. 1983. Vol. 71. No. 3. Pp. 289–296. URL: 70. Scarf H. The Approximation of Fixed Points of a Continuous Mapping // SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics. 1967. Vol. 15. No. 5. Pp. 1328–1343. DOI:10.1137/0115116. 71. Scarf H. The Computation of Equilibrium Prices: An Exposition // Handbook of Mathematical Economics. Vol. II. Eds. K. Arrow, A. Kirman. Chapter 4. 1982. 72. Pp. 1007–1067. URL: 73. Scarf H.E. Economic Equilibrium and Soviet Economic Reform. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper. No. 969. February, 1991. URL: 74. Shapley L.S. On Balanced Sets and Cores // Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. 1967. Vol. 14. No. 4. Pp. 453–460. 75. Shoven J.B., Whalley J. Applied General Equilibrium Model of Taxation and International Trade: an Introduction and Survey // Journal of Economic Literature. 1984. Vol. 22. Pp. 1007–1051. 76. Souza de L.V. An Initial Estimation of the Economic Effects of the Creation of the EurAsEC Customs Union on its Members / The World Bank. Economic Premise. 2011. No. 47. URL: 77. St-Hilaire F., Whalley J. A Microconsistent Equilibrium Data Set for Canada for use in Tax Policy Analysis // Review Income and Wealth. 1983. Vol. 29. No. 2. Pp. 175–204. 78. Taylor L., Black S.L. Practical General Equilibrium Estimation of Resource Pulls under Trade Liberalization. Economic Development Report 208 / Development Research Group. Center for International Affairs Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. February, 1972. URL: 79. Taylor L., Lysy F. Vanishing Income Redistributions. Keynesian Clues about Model Surprises in the Short Run // Journal of Development Economics. 1979. Vol. 6. Pp. 11–29. 80. Thissen M. A Classification of Empirical CGE Modelling. SOM Research Report 99C01 / University of Groningen. Netherlands. December, 1998. URL: 81. Walmsley T.L., Dimaranan B.V., McDougall R.A. A Base Case Scenario for the Dynamic GTAP Model. July, 2000. URL: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/1271.pdf (дата обращения: 11.05.2014). 82. Wang K., Wang C., Chen J. Analysis of the Economic Impact of Different Chinese Climate Policy Options Based on a CGE Model Incorporating Endogenous Technological Change // Energy Policy. 2009. Vol. 37. No. 8. Pp. 2930–2940. 83. Yang Y. China’s Integration into the World Economy: Implications for Developing Countries / IMF. WP/03/245. December, 2003. URL: |
Финансирование | |
Дата поступления |