| In the section | Articles |
| Title of the article | Decentralization, Integration and Regionalization: Interrelation and Interdependence |
| Pages | 19-35 |
| Author | Alexander Mikhailovich Libman Candidate of Economics, Senior Research Fellow Institute of Economics RAS 32 Nakhimovsky Prospect, Moscow, Russia, 117218 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
| Abstract | The type of interrelation and interdependence of the following three aspects of organizing economic spaces is determined: international economic integration, domestic markets integration, and choosing a model of political and administrative decentralization. The conditions have been distinguished under which the involvement of separate regions in the international integration structure promotes integration of the internal space. The alteration of the decentralization model as a result of enhanced involvement in the world economic relations has been analyzed |
| Code | 332.135 |
| DOI | 10.14530/se.2008.4.019-035 |
| Keywords | Integration ♦ decentralization ♦ regionalization ♦ markets ♦ economic space |
| Download | |
| For citation | Libman A.M. Decentralization, Integration and Regionalization: Interrelation and Interdependence. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2008, no. 4, pp. 19-35. DOI: 10.14530/se.2008.4.019-035. (In Russian). |
| References | 1. Глущенко К. П. Модели и методы исследования пространственной интеграции рынков товаров. Дис. … д-ра экон. наук. Новосибирск, 2008. 2. Каспэ С. Центры и иерархии: пространственные метафоры власти и западная политическая форма. М.: Московская школа политических исследований, 2007. 3. Кондрашова Л. И. Китайский опыт реформирования государственно-территориального устройства страны // Региональная политика: опыт России и Китая. М.: ИДВ РАН, 2007. 4. Латов Ю. В. Новая экономическая история Гражданской войны в Америке и ликвидации плантационного рабства // Экономический вестник РГУ. 2004. Т. 2. № 1. 5. Либман А. М. Модели корпоративной интеграции: региональные особенности // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2008. № 5. 6. Лузанова А. Региональные аспекты государственного регулирования банковской системы: Поучительный опыт США // Российский экономический журнал. 2000. № 3. 7. Поллард А. М., Пассейк Х. Г. Эллис К. Х., Дейли Ж. П. Банковское право США / Пер. с англ. М.: Прогресс, Универс, 1992. 8. Alesina A., Spolaore E. On the Number and Size of Nations // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997. Vol. 112. 9. Ash R., Kueh Y. Y. Economic Integration within Greater China: Trade and Investment Flows between China, Hong Kong and Taiwan // China Quarterly. 1993. № 136. 10. Bai C.-E., Du Y., Tao Z., Tang S.Y. Local Protectionism and Regional Specialization: Evidence from China’s Industries // Journal of International Economics. 2003. Vol. 63. № 2. 11. Batisse C., Poncet S. Protectionism and Industry Location in Chinese Provinces. Mimeo. 2003. 12. Berkovitz D., DeLong D. N. Economic Fragmentation in Russia // Economic of Governance. 2005. Vol. 6. № 3. 13. Blanchard O., Shleifer A. Federalism with and without Political Decentralization: China versus Russia. IMF Staff Paper. 2001. Vol. 48. 14. Breslin S. Decentralization, Globalization, and China’s Partial Re-Engagement with the Global Economy // New Political Economy. 2000. Vol. 5. № 2. 15. Carbonara E., Parisi F. Choice of Law and Legal Institutions: Rethinking the Market for Legal Rules // University of Minnesota Law School Legal Studies Research Paper. № 07-38. 2007. 16. Chen N. Intra-National Versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter? // Journal of International Economics. 2004. Vol. 63. 17. Courchene T. J. Vertical and Horizontal Fiscal Imbalances: An Ontario Perspective. Mimeo. 2005. 18. Dascher K., Haupt A. The Political Economy of Regional Integration Projects Where Rich and Poor Meet. CESifo Working Paper. 2008. № 2280. 19. Das-Gupta A. Internal Trade Barriers in India: Fiscal Check-Posts. Mimeo. 2003. 20. Dunning J. H., Robson P. Multinational Corporate Integration and Regional Economic Integration // Journal of Common Market Studies. 1987. Vol. 26. № 2. 21. Fan C. S., Wei X. The Law of One Price: Evidence from the Transitional Economy of China // Review of Economics and Statistics. 2006. Vol. 88. № 4. 22. Feenstra R. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press, 2004. 23. Friedman D. A. Theory of the Size and Shape of Nations // Journal of Political Economy. 1977. Vol. 85. 24. Garnaut R., Song L. (eds.). China: Linking Markets for Growth. Canberra: ANU Press, 2007. 25. Goldberg P. K., Verboen F. Market Integration and Convergence to the Law of One Price: Evidence from the European Car Market // Journal of International Economics. 2005. Vol. 65. № 1. 26. Goletti F., Ahmed R., Farid N. Structural Determinants of Market Integration: the Case of Rice Markets in Bangladesh // Development Economies. 1995. Vol. 33. № 2. 27. Hegre H. Has Commerce Replaced Conquest? Development and Territorial Wars. Mimeo. 2000. 28. Irwin D. A. The Impact of Federation on Australia’s Trade Flows. Mimeo. 2005. 29. Jones R. S., King R. E., Klein M. Economic Integration between Hong Kong, Taiwan and the Coastal Provinces of China // OECD Economic Study. 1993. № 20. 30. Keller W., Shiue C. H. Market Integration and Economic Development: A Long-Run Comparison. Mimeo. 2004. 31. Kumar V. Designing Secession Proof States: Conflict over Size of Provinces. Mimeo. 2008. 32. Macmillan K., Grady P. Interprovincial Barriers to Internal Trade in Goods, Services and Flows of Capital: Policy, Knowledge Gaps and Research Issues. MPRA Paper № 8709. March. 2008. 33. Morton F. L. Equality or Asymmetry? Alberta at the Crossroads. Queen’s University, Asymmetry Series. № 2. 2005. 34. Okubo T. The Border Effect in the Japanese Market: A Gravity Model Analysis. University of Michigan Research Seminar in International Economics № 494. 2003. 35. Pires I. M. Iberian Market Integration: A Case Study of a Regional Integration Process. Mimeo. 2006. 36. Poncet S. A Fragmented China: Measure and Determinants of the Chinese Domestic Market Disintegration // Review of International Economics. 2005. Vol. 12. № 3. 37. Poncet S. Economic Integration of the Yunnan with the Greater Mekong Subregion. // Asian Economic Journal. 2006. Vol. 20. № 3. 38. Poncet S. Measuring Chinese Domestic and International Integration // China Economic Review. 2003. Vol. 14. 39. Poncet S. Provincial Migration Dynamics in China: Borders, Costs, and Economic Motivation // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2006. Vol. 36. № 6. 40. Rogers J. H. Monetary Union, Price Level Convergence, and Inflation: How Close Is Europe to the USA? // Journal of Monetary Economics. 2007. Vol. 54. № 3. 41. Seliger B. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy in North Korea — A Tentative Appraisal. Mimeo. 2007. 42. Sheng Y. Global Market Integration and Central Political Control: Foreign Trade and Intergovernmental Relations in China // Comparative Political Studies. 2007. Vol. 40. № 4. 43. Tang K. K. Economic Integration of the Chinese Provinces: A Business Cycle Approach // Journal of Economic Integration. 1998. Vol. 13. 44. Treisman D. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 45.. Virmani A., Mittal S. Domestic Market Integration. ICRIER Working paper № 183. 2006. 46. Weingast B. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Growth // Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 1995. Vol. 11. № 1. 47. Wolf H. C. Intranational Home Bias in Trade // Review of Economics and Statistics. 2000. Vol. 82. № 4. 48. Xu X. Have the Chinese Provinces Become Integrated under Reform? // China Economic Review. 2002. № 13. 49. Xu X., Voon J. P. Regional Integration in China: A Statistical Model // Economics Letters. 2003. Vol. 79. 50. Young A. The Razor’s Edge: Distortions and Incremental Reform in the People’s Republic of China // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2000. Vol. 15. № 4. |