| In the section | Digest |
| Title of the article | French Spatial Economics: from Industrial Districts to Competitive Clusters |
| Pages | 71-99 |
| Author | Vadim Nikolayevich Ukrainsky Senior Analytical Consultant Khabarovsk School of Management 153 Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
| Abstract | Based on the analysis of foreign publications considered is the evolution of the European spatial economics of the second half of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century: the emergence of the Italian theory of industrial districts, theory of innovative environment (GREMI-approach) and competitive clusters. Typical features and specific characteristics are shown of the theoretical constructions originated in the depths of French spatial economics |
| Code | 330.8 |
| DOI | 10.14530/se.2011.3.071-099 |
| Keywords | Localization of economic activity ♦ industrial districts ♦ innovative environment ♦ growth poles ♦ competitive clusters |
| Download | |
| For citation | Ukrainsky V.N. French Spatial Economics: from Industrial Districts to Competitive Clusters. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2011, no. 3, pp. 71-99. DOI: 10.14530/se.2011.3.071-099. (In Russian). |
| References | 1. Блауг М. Экономическая мысль в ретроспективе. М.: Дело Лтд, 1994. 720 с. 2. Кастельс М. Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество и культура. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2000. 608 с. 3. Кейнс Дж. М. Альфред Маршалл, 1842—1924 // Маршалл А. Основы экономической науки. М.: Эксмо, 2007. С. 11—43. 4. Маршалл А. Основы экономической науки. М.: Эксмо, 2007. 832 с. 5. Одинцова А. В. Французский регуляционизм. Институциональные системы и институциональные трансформации. М.: Институт экономики РАН, 2008. 258 с. 6. Тиссэ Ж.-Ф. Забвение пространства в экономической мысли // Пространственная экономика. 2007. № 4. С. 88—104; 2008. № 1. С. 78—87. 7. Украинский В. Н. Современная французская пространственная экономика: теория близости и типологизация локализованных экономических систем // Пространственная экономика. 2011. № 2. С. 92—126. 8. Aglietta M., Boyer R. Poles de competitivite, strategie industrielle et politique macro-economique. Paris. Couverture Orange CEPREMAP № 8223. 1982. 9. Asheim B. T. Industrial Districts: The Contributions of Marshall and Beyond // Clark G.L., Feldman M.P., Gertler M.S. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 413—431. 10. Assens C., Abittan Y. Networking et poles de competitivite: les cas du technopark de Casablanca // Innovations. 2010. № 31. P. 157—180. 11. Becattini G. From Marshall’s to the Italian «Industrial Districts». A Brief Critical Reconstruction // Quadrio Curzio A., Fortis M. (eds.) Complexity and Industrial Clusters. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 2002. P. 83—105. 12. Becattini G. Il concetto d’industria e la teoria del valore. Torino: Boringhieri, 1962. 194 p. 13. Becattini G. Il distretto industriale marshalliano come concetto socio-economico // Pyke F., Becattini G., Sengenberger W. (eds.) Distretti industriali e cooperazione fra imprese in Italia. Firenze: Banca toscana, 1991. P. 51—65. 14. Becattini G. Le district industriel: milieu creatif // Espaces et Societes. 1992. № 66—67. P. 147—163. 15. Becattini G. Riflessioni sul distretto industriale marshalliano come concetto socioeconomico // Stato e mercato. 1989. № 25. P. 111—128. 16. Becattini G. The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion //Pyke F., Becattini G., Sengenberger W. (eds.) Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990. P. 37—51. 17. Bellandi M. The incentives to decentralized industrial creativity in local systems of small firms // Revue d’economie industrielle. 1992. Vol. 59. P. 99—110. 18. Benko G., Dunford M., Heurley J. Districts industriels: Vingt ans de recherche // Espaces et Societes. 1997. № 88—89. P. 305—327. 19. Bramanti A. From Space to Territory: Relational Development and Territorial Competitiveness. The GREMI Approach within the Contemporary Debate. Paper presented at the conference «SMEs and districts: hybrid governance forms, knowledge creation & technology transfer». Castellanza. 1998. 5—7 November. 20. Brusco S. The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1982. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 167—184. 21. Brusco S. The idea of the Industrial District: Its genesis // Pyke F., Becattini G., Sengenberger W. (eds.) Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990. P. 10—19. 22. Camagni R. Territorial capital and regional development // Capello R., Nijkamp P. (eds.) Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2009. P. 118—132. 23. Camagni R., Capello R. Urban Milieux: From Theory to Empirical Findings // Boschma R. A., Kloosterman R. C. (eds.) Learning from Clusters: A Critical Assessment from an Economic-Geographical Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005. P. 249—274. 24. Capello R. Space and Theoretical Approaches to Regional Growth // Capello R., Camagni R., Chizzolini B., Fratesi U. Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe: European Competitiveness and Global Strategies. Berlin: Springer, 2008. P. 13—31. 25. Capello R. Space, growth and development // Capello R., Nijkamp P. (eds.) Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2009. P. 33—52. 26. Coppin O. Le milieu innovateur: une approche par le systeme // Innovations. 2002. № 16. P. 29—50. 27. Crevoisier O. The Innovative Milieus Approach: Toward a Territorialized Understanding of the Economy? // Economic Geography. 2004. Vol. 80. № 4. P. 367—379. 28. Daumas J.-C. Districts industriels: du concept a l’histoire. Les termes du debat // Revue economique. 2007. Vol. 58. № 1. P. 131—152. 29. DeBresson Ch. A l’ombre de la dynamo technologique: dependance technologique, innovation et pole de developpement // Politique. 1986. № 10. P. 55—90. 30. DeBresson Ch. Les poles technologiques du developpement: vers un concept operationnel // Revue Tiers-Monde. 1989. Tome 30. № 118. P. 245—270. 31. Fourcade C. Nouvelles activites et creation du local // The Canadian Journal of Regional Science. 1992. Vol. XV. № 3. P. 473—490. 32. Gaffard J.-L., Romani P.-M. A propos de la localisation des activites industrielles: le district marshallien // Revue francaise d’economie. 1990. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 171—185. 33. Ganne B. Industrial development and local industrial systems in postwar France: Political economy of a transformation // Storper M., Scott A.J. (eds.) Pathways to industrialization and regional development. London: Routledge, 1992. P. 193—204. 34. Ganne B., Lecler Y. From Industrial Districts to Poles of Competitiveness // Ganne B., Lecler Y. (eds.) Asian Industrial Clusters, Global Competitiveness and New Policy Initiatives. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2009. P. 3—24. 35. Garner G. Territoire et espace dans la theorie economique en Allemagne, 1750—1820 // Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine. 2001. № 2. P. 25—50. 36. Garofoli G. Economic development, organization of production and territory // Revue d’economie industrielle. 1993. Vol. 64. P. 22—37. 37. Hobson J. A. The Evolution of Modern Capitalism. A Study of Machine Production. London: Walter Scott, Ltd., 1894. XIV. 388 p. 38. Houssel J.-P. Districts industriels et milieux intermediaires // Revue de geographie de Lyon. 1995. Vol. 70. № 1. Р. 7—10. 39. Houssel J.-P. Essor des villes manufacturieres de l’habillement et industrialisation spontanee dans «l’Italie du Milieu» // Revue de geographie de Lyon. 1972. Vol. 47. № 4. Рp. 361—383. 40. Lacour C. A propos de l’ouvrage Milieux Innovateurs, theorie et politiques. Textes reunis par Roberto Camagni et Denis Maillat, 2006, Anthropos Economica, Paris // Revue d’economie regionale et urbaine. 2007. № 1. P. 127—137. 41. Landstrom H. Pioneers in Entrepreneurship and Small Business Research. New York: Springer, 2005. 380 p. 42. Lecoq B. Dynamique industrielle et localisation: Alfred Marshall revisite // Revue francaise d’economie. 1993. Vol. 8. № 4. P. 195—234. 43. Lipietz A. Polarisation interregionale et tertiarisation de la societe // L’Espace Geographique. 1980. № 1. P. 33—42. 44. Maillat D. La relation des entreprises innovatrices avec leur milieu // Maillat D., Perrin J.-C. (eds.) Entreprises innovatrices et developpement territorial. Neuchatel: GREMI/EDES, 1992. P. 3—22. 45. Maillat D. Milieux et dynamique territoriale de l’innovation // The Canadian Journal of Regional Science. 1992. Vol. XV. № 2. P. 199—218. 46. Maillat D., Crevoisier O., Vasserot J.-Y. Innovation et district industriel: l’Arc jurassien suisse // Maillat D., Perrin J.-C. (eds.) Entreprises innovatrices et developpement territorial. Neuchatel: GREMI/EDES, 1992. P. 105—125. 47. Maillat D., Perrin J.-C. (eds.) Entreprises innovatrices et developpement territorial. Neuchatel: GREMI/EDES, 1992. 260 p. 48. Maillat D., Quevit M., Senn L. (eds.) Reseaux d’innovation et milieux innovateurs: un pari pour le developpement regional. Neuchatel: GREMI/EDES, 1993. 388 p. 49. Marshall A. Industry and Trade. A study of industrial technique and business organization; and of their influences on the conditions of various classes and nations. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd., 1919. XXIV. 874 p. 50. Marshall A. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan and Co., 1890. XXVIII. 754 p. 51. Marshall A. Principles of Economics. 3rd ed. London: Macmillan and Co., 1895. XXXII. 824 p. 52. Marshall A., Paley Marshall M. The Economics of Industry. London: Macmillan and Co., 1879. XIV. 232 p. 53. Moulaert F., Nussbaumer J. The Social Region: Beyond the Territorial Dynamics of the Learning Economy // European Urban and Regional Studies. 2005. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 45—64. 54. Moulaert F., Sekia F. Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey // Regional Studies. 2003. Vol. 37. № 3. P. 289—302. 55. Pecqueur B. Des poles de croissance aux poles de competitivite: un nouveau partage des ressources cognitives // Annales des Mines. Serie «Realites industrielles». 2007. Mai. P. 38—43. 56. Perrat J. Appropriation syndicale des enjeux territoriaux: la question nodale du rapport firme/territoire // Revue de l’IRES. 2007. № 54. P. 71—93. 57. Perrin J.-C. Urbanisation et developpement a base regionale // Revue Tiers-Monde. 1971. Tome 12. № 45. P. 45—72. 58. Perroux F. Les investissements multinationaux et l’analyse des poles de developpement et des poles d’integration // Revue Tiers-Monde. 1968. Tome 9. № 34. P. 239—265. 59. Perroux F. Note sur la ville consideree comme pole de developpement et comme foyer du progres // Revue Tiers-Monde. 1967. Tome 8. № 32. P. 1147—1158. 60. Plunket A., Torre A. Les poles de competitivite ou le retour ambigu des declinaisons locales de la politique industrielle francaise // Economia e polotica industriale. 2009. № 3. P. 159—177. 61. Quevit M. Milieux innovateurs et couplage local-international dans les strategies d’entreprise: un cadre pour l’analyse // The Canadian Journal of Regional Science. 1992. Vol. XV. № 2. P. 219—237. 62. Ratti R., D’Ambrogio F. Processus d’innovation et integration locale dans une zone peripherique // Maillat D., Quevit M., Senn L. (eds.) Reseaux d’innovation et milieux innovateurs: un pari pour le developpement regional. Neuchatel: GREMI/EDES, 1993. P. 167—195. 63. Retour D. Poles de competitivite, propos d’etape // Revue francaise de gestion. 2009. № 190. P. 93—99. 64. Saglio J. Localized Industrial Systems in France: A Particular Type of Industrial System // Storper M., Scott A.J. (eds.) Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development. London: Routledge, 1992. P. 205—224. 65. Storper M. Industrial policy for latecomers: Products, conventions, and learning // Storper M., Thomadakis S. B., Tsipouri L. J. (eds.) Latecomers in the Global Economy. London: Routledge, 1998. P. 11—37. 66. Tabaries M. Les apports du GREMI a l’analyse territoriale de l’innovation ou 20 ans de recherche sur les milieux innovateurs. Maison des Sciences Economiques. Universite Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne. Cahiers de la MSE № 2005.18. 2005. 67. Uzunidis D. Milieu innovateur, relations de proximite et entrepreneuriat. Analyse d’une alchimie feconde // The Canadian Journal of Regional Science. 2010. Vol. XXXIII. Special Issue. P. 91—106. 68. Zeitlin J. Districts industriels et flexibilite de la production hier, aujourd’hui et demain // Lescure M. (ed.) La mobilisation du territoire. Les districts industriels en Europe occidentale du XVIIe au XXe siecle. Paris: Comite pour l’Histoire Economique et Financiere de la France, 2006. P. 447—472. |