| In the section | Surveys |
| Title of the article | Russian Spatial Economics: a Bibliometric Analysis |
| Pages | 111-134 |
| Author 1 |
Alexander Nikolaevich Demyanenko Doctor of Geography, Professor, Chief Researcher Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153 Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
| Author 2 |
Nikolay Alexandrovich Demyanenko Consultant Khabarovsk School of Management Khabarovsk, Russia This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
| Author 3 |
Vadim Nikolaevich Ukrainsky Senior Lecturer Pacific National University 136 Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680035 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
| Abstract | The article gives a brief overview of bibliometric methods in science studies. In the empirical part of the paper the authors explore the hypothesis that spatial economics, while existing as a relatively independent and developing field of study, remains a fragmented one. A database of publications in the area of spatial economics extracted from the Scientific Electronic Library was used to study several indicators characterizing development dynamics of the field of spatial economics in the last 10–15 years, its level of fragmentation and the corpus of journals favored in the field. Publications were selected for inclusion in the study with three search queries: «regional economy», «economy of the region» and «spatial economics». Using a cross-citation matrix the study revealed and described communications network between leading Russian journals in the field of spatial economics. The authors conclude that studies on spatial economics are very ambiguous and fragmented, in spite of impressive growth rates of domestic publications on this topic |
| Code | 332.01+001.8 |
| DOI | 10.14530/se.2012.3.111-134 |
| Keywords | spatial economics ♦ regional economy ♦ economy of the region ♦ scientific schools ♦ scientificdirections ♦ science of science ♦ science-dimension ♦ bibliometric methods |
| Download | |
| For citation | Demyanenko A.N., Ukrainsky V.N., Demyanenko N.A. Russian Spatial Economics: a Bibliometric Analysis. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2012, no. 3, pp. 111-134. DOI: 10.14530/se.2012.3.111-134. (In Russian). |
| References | 1. Auktsinek S., Churkina G. Economic journals in the period of market reforms. Voprosy economiki [Economic issues], 2010, no. 2, pp. 130–145. (In Russian). 2. Bednyy B.I., Sorokin Yu.M. About the Science Citation indices and their application. Vyshee obrazovanie v Rossii [High Education in Russia], 2012, no. 3, pp. 17–28. (In Russian). 3. Grezneva O.Yu. Scientific schools: principles of classification. Vyshee obrazovanie v Rossii [High Education in Russia], 2004, no. 5, pp. 42–48. (In Russian). 4. Griffith B.C., Mullins N.C. Coherent social groups in scientific change («Invisible colleges» may be consistent throughout science). Science, 1972, vol. 177, no 4053, pp. 959–966. (Russ. ed.: Griffit B.Ch., Mallinz N.Ch. Sotsialnye gruppirovki v razvitii nauki. Kommunikatsiya v sovremennoy nauke [Communication in modern science]. Moscow, 1976, pp. 131–151). 5. Guba K.S. Academic journals: the reproduction of local reputations. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politilogiya [Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Politology], 2011, no. 1, pp. 152–163. (In Russian). 6. Demyanenko A.N., Izotov D.A., Demyanenko N.A., Ukrainsky V.N. «Clusters», «TPC», «growth poles» in Russia’s Science Journals. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika – Spatial economics, 2011, no. 1, pp. 93–106. (In Russian). 7. Minakir P.A., Demyanenko A.N. Spatial Economics: the Evolution of Approaches and Methodology. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika – Spatial economics, 2010, no. 2, pp. 6–32. (In Russian). 8.. Minakir P.A., Demyanenko A.N. Social Development: Interdisciplinary Interactions of Spatial Projections. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika – Spatial economics, 2011, no. 4, pp. 124–134. (In Russian). 9. Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1970. (Russ. ed.: Kun T. Struktura nauchnikh revolyutsiy. Moscow, 1977, 300 p.) 10. Merton R.K. Matthew Effect in Science, II: the accumulation of advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. THESIS, 1993, vol. 3, pp. 256–276. (In Russian). 11. Mirskaya E.Z. Evaluation mechanism and the formation of knowledge in the natural sciences. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 1979, no. 5, pp. 119–130. (In Russian). 12. Mirskaya E.Z. Scientific schools: history, problems and prospects. Naukovedenie i novye tendentsii v razvitii sovremennoy nauki [Science of science and new trends in the development of Russian science], еdited by A.G. Allakhverdyan, N.N. Semenova, A.V. Yurevich. Moscow, 2005, pp. 244–265. (In Russian). 13. Mirskiy E.M. The systems approach to the study of science (methodological comments). Sistemnye issledovaniya. Ezhegodnik [System studies, Yearbook]. Moscow, 1973, pp. 187–202. (In Russian). 14. Mirskiy E.M., Yudin B.G. The disciplinary structure of science (The introductory article). Nauchnaya deyatelnost: structura i instituty [Scientific activity: Structure and Institutions]. Moscow, 1980, pp. 5–24. (In Russian). 15. Nalimov V.V., Mulchenko Z.M. Scientometrics. The study of science as an information process. Moscow, 1969, 192 p. (In Russian). 16. Price D.J. de S. Networks of scientific papers. Science, 1965, vol. 149, no 3683. pp. 510–515. (Russ. ed.: Prays D. Sistema nauchnikh publikatsiy. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk – Advances in physical sciences, 1966, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 349–359). 17. Price D.J. de S., Beaver D. de B. Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 1966, vol. 21, no 11, pp. 1011–1018. (Russ. ed.: Prays D., Biver D. Sotrudnichestvo v «nevidimom kolledje» Kommunikatsiya v sovremennoy nauke [Communication in modern science]. Moscow, 1976, pp. 335–350). 18. Khaytun S.D. Scientometrics. Status and prospects. Moscow, 1983, 344 p. (In Russian). 19. Bjorneborn L., Ingwersen P. Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2004, vol. 55, no. 14, pp. 1216–1227. 20. Eom S.B. Author cocitation analysis: quantitative methods for mapping the intellectual structure of an academic discipline. Hershey: Information Science Reference, 2009, 366 p. 21. Geison G.L. Scientific change, emerging specialities, and research schools. History of Science, 1981, vol. XIX, pp. 20–38. 22. Godin B. From eugenics to scientometrics: Galton, Cattell, and men of science. Social Studies of Science, 2007, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 691–728. 23. Godin B. On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 2006, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 109–133. 24. Godin B. The value of science: changing conceptions of scientific productivity, 1869 to circa 1970. Social Science Information, 2009, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 547–586. 25. Maie G., Kaufmann A., Vyborny M. Is Regional Science a Scientific Discipline? Answers from a Citation Based Social Network Analysis. SRE-Discussion 2008/02, Institut fur Regional- und Umweltwirtschaft, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, 2008. 35 р. 26. Price D.J. de S. Ethics of scientific publication. Science, 1964, vol. 144, no. 3619, pp. 655–657. 27. Price D.J. de S. Networks of scientific papers. Science, 1965, vol. 149, no. 3683, pp. 510–515. |
| Financing | The article was implemented with the financial support of the Russian State Regional Scientific Fund, project No. 11-02-00566a |