Scientific Journal SPATIAL ECONOMICS - International Economic Integration in the Asia Pacific Region and Russia’s Interests: Results of 25 Years

In the section	Articles
Title of the article	International Economic Integration in the Asia Pacific Region and Russia’s Interests: Results of 25 Years
Pages	16-40
Author	Yana Valeryevna Dyomina Candidate of Economics, Research Fellow Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153, Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-5208-7273
Abstract	In 2017 Russia marked the 25th anniversary of economic reforms. In the sphere of foreign policy in the Asia-Pacific region (APR) it resulted in the FTA between Vietnam and the Eurasian Economic Union and membership in APEC. During the mentioned period Russia has not changed its role in the region: it’s still viewed as a supplier of raw materials and it’s not very attractive as FDI recipient. In recent years China has become the main trade partner of Russia and the APR’s share in the Russian foreign trade turnover has grown substantially (in imports from 11.8% in 1996 to 39.4% in 2016, in exports from 18.6% to 23.1%). As for the Russian Far East, the APR partners played a leading role in foreign trade relations throughout the studied period, however, they sharply devalued as investors (offshore territories and European countries occupied leading positions both in the Russian Far East and country as a whole). At the same time, during the years the APR’s integration area transformed significantly. Firs, there was enlargement of integration blocks. Second, integration processes became ‘deeper’ and ‘broader’ (agreements cover more and more issues). Now the formats of multilateral economic cooperation in the APR include following: APEC, NAFTA, ASEAN, TPP, etc. Among them the author emphasizes two blocs with hugest experience and ‘depth’ of integration processes development – NAFTA and ASEAN. During the period 1991–2015 each of these blocks was characterized by increasing share of mutual trade and the least developed members of the mentioned unions (Mexico in NAFTA and Laos, Myanmar, Cambodia and Vietnam in ASEAN) had the highest growth rates of merchandise exports and imports. Although the operation of each of the associations had a positive impact on the dynamics of foreign trade of their member countries the study fails to prove a direct relationship between NAFTA and AFTA functioning and economic growth of their member states. The estimates show that the greatest impact on economic growth of NAFTA members is made by the dynamics of the world GDP and economic growth of ASEAN member states depends on the HDI dynamics, i. e. changes in the level of development of the studied countries. As for Russia, currently it’s not an active participant in multilateral cooperation process in the APR (it has only one FTA with regional partner) which in the future may adversely affect long-term development and prosperity of not only the Russian Far East but the whole country
Code	339.92
DOI	10.14530/se.2017.2.016-040
Keywords	international economic integration ♦ free trade area ♦ Asia Pacific region ♦ FTAAP ♦ NAFTA ♦ ASEAN ♦ TPP ♦ APEC ♦ Russia
Download	SE.2017.2.016-040.Dyomina.pdf
For citation	Dyomina Ya.V. International Economic Integration in the Asia Pacific Region and Russia’s Interests: Results of 25 Years. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2017, no. 2, pp. 16–40. DOI: 10.14530/se.2017.2.016-040. (In Russian).
References	1. About ASEAN, 2017. Available at: http://asean.org/asean/about-asean/overview/ (accessed March 2017). 2. About the Sakhalin-1 Project, 2017. Available at: http://www.sakhalin-1.com/ru-ru/company/about-us/about-sakhalin-1-project/about. (accessed April 2017). (In Russian). 3. Bilateral Linkages Database. APEC, 2017. Available at: http://statistics.apec.org/index.php/bilateral_linkage/index (accessed May 2017). 4. Customs Foreign Trade Statistics. Federal Customs Service of the Russian Federation, 2017. Available at: http://stat.customs.ru/apex/f?p=201:3:4173026212482819::NO (accessed April 2017). (In Russian). 5. Devaeva E.I. Economic Cooperation in North-East Asia: Regional Aspects. Edited by P.A. Minakir. Economic Research Institute FEB RAS. Vladivostok: FEB RAS, 2004, 208 p. (In Russian). 6. Dyomina Ya.V. Trade Integration Effects in ASEAN Countries. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2015, no. 3, pp. 120–141. DOI: 10.14530/se.2015.3.120-141. (In Russian). 7. Economic and Financial Indicators Database. Asia Regional Integration Center, 2017. Available at: https://aric.adb.org/database/economic-financial-indicators (accessed May 2017). 8. Economic Cooperation between the Russian Far East and Asia-Pacific Countries. Edited by P.A. Minakir. Economic Research Institute FEB RAS. Sasakawa Peace Foundation. Khabarovsk, 2007, 208 p. (In Russian). 9. Gelbras V. Asia-Pacific Region and the Problems of Integration of Russia into the World Economy. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 1997, no. 12, pp. 56–63. (In Russian). 10. Goncharenko S. Russia and APEC. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 1998, no. 10, pp. 88–92. (In Russian). 11. Gulidov R.V. The Tumen River Project: Myths and Realities. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2012, no. 1, pp. 90–108. DOI: 10.14530/se.2012.1.090-108. (In Russian). 12. Izotov D.A. Liberalization of Russian-Vietnamese Trade: Pros and Cons for the Russian Economy. Izvestiya IGEA [News of Irkutsk State Economic Academy], 2013, no. 6 (92), pp. 108–115. (In Russian). 13. Izotov D.A. Effects of Free Trade Area Creation between Russia & the Pacific Rim’s MegaTrade Agreements // Izvestiyz DVFU. Ekonomika i Upravlenie = The Bulletin of the Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management, 2016, no. 4, pp. 83–95. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.220685. (In Russian). 14. Kheyfets B.A. Transregional Reformatting of the Global Economic Space. Challenges for Russia. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS, 2016, 86 p. (In Russian). 15. Komkova E. NAFTA at 20. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2015, no. 7, pp. 41–52. (In Russian). 16. Kostyunina G.М. North American Integration after 20 Years. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta = Vestnik MGIMO University, 2015b, no. 2 (41), pp. 231–241. (In Russian). 17. Kostyunina G.М. Investment Regulation in Regional Integration Agreements in Western Hemisphere // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta = Vestnik MGIMO University, 2015a, no. 6 (45), pp. 236–246. (In Russian). 18. Lukin A.L. Russia and an Emerging Economic Community of Northeast Asia: The Role of the Republic of Korea. Oykumena. Regionovedcheskie Issledovaniya = Ojkumena. Regional Researches, 2016, no. 3, pp. 136–143. (In Russian). 19. Member Economies. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, 2017. Available at: http://www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/Member-Economies (accessed May 2017). 20. Regional Trade Agreements Database. WTO, 2017. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/rta_participation_map_e.htm (accessed April 2017). 21. Regions of Russia. Socio-Economic Indicators. 2016. Federal State Statistics Service. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b16_14p/Main.htm (accessed May 2017). (In Russian). 22. Roadmap for an ASEAN Community 2009–2015. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 2009, 128 p. 23. Russia in Figures. 2003–2016. Federal State Statistics Service. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1135075100641 (accessed April 2017). (In Russian). 24. Sakhalin Energy, 2017. Available at: http://www.sakhalinenergy.ru/ru/company/overview.wbp. (accessed April 2017). (In Russian). 25. Salamatov V.Yu. Mega-Regional Trade Agreements. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2016, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 17–27. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-9-17-27. (In Russian). 26. Sokolov V.V. Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Positions in the International Economic Agreements. Rossiyskiy Vneshneekonomicheskiy Vestnik = Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, 2016, no. 11, pp. 56–69. (In Russian). 27. Statistics Database. UNCTAD, 2017. Available at: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx?sCS_ChosenLang=en (accessed April 2017). 28. The Commonwealth of Independent States. The CIS Executive Committee, 2017. Available at: http://cis.minsk.by/page.php?id=174 (accessed May 2017). (In Russian). 29. Transitional Economy. Essays on Economic Policies in Post-Communist Russia. 1991–1997. Edited by Е.Т. Gaidar. Moscow: Institute for the Economy in Transition, 1998, 1113 p. (In Russian). 30. Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Asia Regional Integration Center, 2017. Available at: https://aric.adb.org/fta/trans-pacific-partnership-(tpp) (accessed April 2017). 31. UN Comtrade Database, 2017. Available at: http://comtrade.un.org (accessed April 2017). 32. Usoltsev V.I. Pacific Asia: Economic Integration and Prospects of Russia. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2011, no. 8, pp. 67–75. (In Russian). 33. Viet Nam – Eurasian Economic Union Free Trade Agreement (Viet Nam – Eurasian Economic Union FTA). Asia Regional Integration Center, 2017. Available at: https://aric.adb.org/fta/viet-nam-customs-union-of-russia-belarus-and-kazakhstan-free-trade-agreement (accessed May 2017). 34. WTO Accession. Russian Federation, 2017. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/a1_russie_e.htm (accessed May 2017).
Financing
Date