In the section | From the Chief Editor |
Title of the article | Strategic Branching: Is There a Way out of a Dead End? |
Pages | 7—18 |
Author | Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir Academician RAS, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Research Supervisor Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153 Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-5451-5662 |
Abstract | The article discusses problems of choosing a strategy of Russia’s development. It is shown that the issue is not with choosing a rational way of economic behavior in macrosphere but ways of development in the economy that continues to close, all the mechanisms and relationships of which are oriented at the economy that functions in global production cycle. The article states that Russian economy is in systemic crisis that is a classical Marx’s crisis of overproduction when supporting the ratio and fulfilling balanced obligations (that became state’s obligations after the triumph of state monopoly) is only possible in case of preserving the existing ratio of ‘prices’ (rent income of budget, savings, final expenses, corporate profits, ruble rate, interest rate, etc.). The main problem is identified as internal factors: lack of effective arbitration, stasis of political and social formats, conflict between pseudo-market and state-monopolistic sectors of economy; not the external ones, the existence of which is objective. Therefore numerous discussions about a new strategy of development that were supposed to establish a new effective economy are, in fact, raising a question of necessity of changing the meta-goal, that in turn will lead to the necessity of discussing the issue of content and form of social development in general. |
Code | 338 |
DOI | 10.14530/se.2017.3.007-018 |
Keywords | overproduction crisis ♦ social development ♦ meta-goal ♦ macrosphere ♦ strategy ♦ Russia |
Download | |
For citation | Minakir P.A. Strategic Branching: Is There a Way out of a Dead End? Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2017, no. 3, pp. 7–18. DOI: 10.14530/se.2017.3.007-018. (In Russian). |
References | 1. Gross Domestic Product. Federal State Statistic Service, 2017. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/vvp/kv/tab8.htm (accessed July 2017). (In Russian). 2. Global Economy Returns to Growth. Kommersant [Businessman], 2017, 7 June. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3319565 (accessed June 2017). (In Russian). 3. The Debt of Russia is Proposed to Increase to 150 Percent of GDP. Lenta.Ru, 2017. 3 February. Available at: https://lenta.ru/news/2017/02/03/gdp150/ (accessed June 2017). (In Russian). 4. Abundant Stagnation. Lenta.Ru, 6 February. 2017. Available at: https://lenta.ru/articles/2017/02/06/ageofrise/ (accessed June 2017). (In Russian). 5. Shuvalov Predicted a Two Percent Growth of Russia’s GDP in 2017. Lenta.Ru, 2017. 19 January. Available at: https://lenta.ru/news/2017/01/19/rusecon/ (accessed June 2017). (In Russian). 6. Russia’s Economy has Passed the Stage of Growth. Rambler News Service, 2017, 31 марта. Available at: https://rns.online/articles/Ekonomika-Rossii-pereshla-v-stadiyu-rosta-2017-03-31/ (accessed 16 July 2017). (In Russian). |
Financing | |
Date |