| In the section | Articles |
| Title of the article | Trade Potential and Trade Integration of the Russian Far East: A Regional Perspective |
| Pages | 21-38 |
| Author |
Kiril I. Tochkov PhD in Economics, Associate Professor Department of Economics, Texas Christian University TCU Box 298510. Fort Worth, TX 76129 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-8356-1310 |
| Abstract | Over the past decade, the Russian government has embarked on an ambitious program of economic development in the Russian Far East (RFE), envisioning the transformation of the region into a hub for trade with the Asia Pacific. This paper explores the extent of RFE’s trade integration with both key partners around the world and the rest of Russia. In particular, we calculate the region’s trade potential on the basis of mean predicted values from a gravity model using three samples that offer different perspectives. Actual trade flows are then evaluated relative to the potential and the resulting index is analyzed for various years and countries. Based on the findings of the paper, we can draw several conclusions. First, RFE exports to Northeast Asia have intensified over the period 2008–2017, allowing the region to surpass its potential, although there seems to be room to grow with respect to China. The Russian government could facilitate cross-border trade by further reducing non-tariff barriers and improving transnational infrastructure links. Second, the deepening integration with Northeast Asia has been achieved at the expense of trade links with the rest of Russia. This might appear worrisome, given the geostrategic importance of RFE for Russia. At the same time, it might simply reflect the fact that RFE’s natural resource exports are increasingly diverted to the Asia Pacific, which is more efficient than to ferry them to Western Russia, where they might end up being re-exported to Europe. Similarly, it might be more efficient for RFE to import from China than from more distant parts of Russia. Third, imports from Japan and Korea are far below potential, although these two countries can play a key role in promoting the economic development of RFE |
| Code | 339+332 |
| JEL | F14, F15, R11 |
| DOI | 10.14530/se.2018.4.021-038 |
| Keywords | trade ♦ trade potential ♦ trade integration ♦ regional trade ♦ Russian Far East ♦ Russia |
| Download | |
| For citation | Tochkov K. Trade Potential and Trade Integration of the Russian Far East: A Regional Perspective. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 21-38. DOI: 10.14530/se.2018.4.021-038. (In Russian). |
| References | 1. Alkon M. Do Special Economic Zones Induce Developmental Spillovers? Evidence from India’s States. World Development, 2018, vol. 107, pp. 396–409. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.028 2. Anderson J., van Wincoop E. Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 2003, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 170–192. DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455214 3. Atif R., Liu H., Mahmood H. Pakistan’s Agricultural Exports, Determinants and Its Potential: An Application of Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2017, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 257–276. DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2016.1243724 4. Babetskaia-Kukharchuk O., Maurel M. Russia’s Accession to the WTO: The Potential for Trade Increase. Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 32, no. 4, 2004, pp. 680–699. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2004.08.005 5. Baldwin R. E. Towards an Integrated Europe. London: CEPR, 1994. 6. Brulhart M., Kelly M. Ireland’s Trading Potential with Central and Eastern European Countries: A Gravity Study. The Economic and Social Review, 1999, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 159–174. 7. Chen L., Lombaerde P., Cuyvers L. Markets Matter: The Potential of Intra-Regional Trade in ASEAN and Its Implications for Asian Regionalism. Asian Economic Papers, 2017, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.1162/ASEP_a_00510 8. De Benedictis L., Vicarelli C. Trade Potentials in Gravity Panel Data Models. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2005, vol. 5, no. 1. DOI: 10.1515/1538-0653.1386 9. Edwards S. Openness, Trade Liberalization, and Growth in Developing Countries. Journal of Economic Literature, 1993, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1358–1393. 10. Gros D., Gonciarz A. A Note on the Trade Potential of Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Economy, 1996, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 709–721. 11. Izotov D.A. Economic Collaboration between Russia and China. In: Russia in the WTO: Year After the Entrance… : two Parts. Vol. 2. Near and Such Unsolved Economics / Edited by V.A. Chereshnev, A.I. Tatarkin, M.V. Fedorov. Moscow: Economics, 2014, pp. 659–673. (In Russian). 12. Kumar S., Prabhakar P. India’s Trade Potential and Free Trade Agreements: A Stochastic Frontier Gravity Approach. Global Economy Journal, 2017, vol. 17, no. 1. DOI: 10.1515/gej-2016-0074 13. Leonov S.N. Tools of the State Regional Policy in the Russian Far East. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2017, no. 2, pp. 41–67. DOI: 10.14530/se.2017.2.041-067. (In Russian). 14. Min J., Kang B. Promoting New Growth: ‘Advanced Special Economic Zones’ in the Russian Far East. Russia’s Turn to the East. Domestic Policymaking and Regional Cooperation. Edited by Blakkisrud H., Wilson Rowe E. Cham: Palgrave Pivot, pp. 51–74. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69790-1_4 15. Minakir P.A. ‘Turn to the East’ Policy: Expectations and Reality. Ekonomika Regiona [Economy of Region], 2017, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1016–1029. DOI: 10.17059/2017-4-4. (In Russian). 16. Nilsson L. Trade Integration and the EU Economic Membership Criteria. European Journal of Political Economy, 2000, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 807–27. DOI: 10.1016/S0176-2680(99)00060-9 17. Nurseiit N. Estimation of Kazakhstan’s Trade Potential in the Framework of the Custom Union. Business and Economic Horizons, 2014, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 320–347. DOI: 10.15208/beh.2014.25 18. Papazoglou C., Pentecost E.J., Marques H.A. Gravity Model Forecast of the Potential Trade Effects of EU Enlargement: Lessons from 2004 and Path-Dependency in Integration. The World Economy, 2006, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1077–1089. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00834.x. 19. Rodriguez F., Rodrik D. Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to the Cross-National Evidence, NBER / Macroeconomics Annual, 1999, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 261–325. 20. Rose A., van Wincoop E. National Money as a Barrier to International Trade: The Real Case for Currency Union. American Economic Review, 2001, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 386–390. DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.2.386 21. Salim R., Kabir M., Mawali N. Does More Trade Potential Remain in Arab States of the Gulf? Journal of Economic Integration, 2011, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 217–243. 22. Santos Silva J.M.C., Tenreyro S. The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2006, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 641–658. DOI: 10.1162/rest.88.4.641 23. Shepotylo O. Export Diversification across Countries and Products: Do Eastern European (EE) and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Countries Diversify Enough? The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2013, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 605–638. DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2011.577797 24. Singh T. Does International Trade Cause Economic Growth? A Survey. The World Economy, 2010, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1517–1564. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01243.x 25. Wang J. The Economic Impact of Special Economic Zones: Evidence from Chinese Municipalities. Journal of Development Economics, 2013, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 133–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.009 |