| In the section | Articles |
| Title of the article | Configuration of Free Trade Zones in the Asian-Pacific Region: Comparison of Integration Potentials |
| Pages | 84-106 |
| Author |
Mikhail Vladimirovich Tomilov Post-graduate, Junior Research Fellow Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153, Tihookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-5048-984X |
| Abstract | The article describes the potential free trade zones in Asia-Pacific: Trans-Pacific Partnership, Comprehensive Regional Economic Partnership, Free Trade Zone of Asia-Pacific. Literary sources used by the researchers allowed concluding that the efficiency of integration groups depends on participants’ composition and the level of their trade and economical development. The more heterogeneous trade union participants, the less effective its development. In this article economic proximity and trade interactions intensity are the main factors for choosing integration groups participants. The research goal is to assess the integration potential of mentioned free trade zones in Asia-Pacific. In order to achieve this goal the calculation of participating countries economic proximity and their trade interactions intensity is made by means of econometric and mathematical methods. As a result, Trans-Pacific Partnership which has already been cancelled because of Washington’s withdrawal turned out to be a free trade zone with the biggest integration potential. The results demonstrate the significant gap between the rest of the integration groups and the leader. It is likely to be explained either by incomplete level of integration cooperation for creating sufficient integration group providing positive trade and economical effects or by the absence of such forms of integration cooperation in Asia-Pacific, which let countries receive abovementioned effects. In addition the hypothetical zone of countries with the highest potential integration effects is identified within the premises considered in the article. It consists of 16 countries and demonstrates the highest level of economical proximity |
| Code | 33.339 |
| JEL | F02, F15, F53 |
| DOI | 10.14530/se.2019.1.084-106 |
| Keywords | integration potential ♦ economic integration ♦ Asia-Pacific ♦ free trade zone ♦ regional trade ♦ Trans-Pacific Partnership ♦ Comprehensive Regional Economic Partnership ♦ Free Trade Zone of Asia-Pacific |
| Download | |
| For citation | Tomilov M.V. Configuration of Free Trade Zones in the Asian-Pacific Region: Comparison of Integration Potentials. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15. no. 1, pp. 84–106. DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.1.084-106. (In Russian). |
| References | 1. Arapova E.Ya. Integration Potential of Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya = World Eсonomy and International Relations, 2016, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 68–81. (In Russian). 2. Arguello R.C. Economic Integration. An Overview of Basic Economic Theory and other Related Issues. Economia, 2000, no. 3, pp. 3–49. 3. Cimino-Isaacs C., Schott J.J. Trans-Pacific Partnership: An Assessment. Edited by C. Cimino-Isaacs, J.J. Schott. Washington, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2016, 136 p. 4. Doing Business 2016. Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency. Washington: World Bank Group, 2016, 340 p. 5. Fergusson I.F., McMinimy M.A., Williams B.R. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): In Brief. Congressional Research Service, 2016. Available at: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R44278.pdf (accessed July 2018). 6. Fergusson I.F., Williams B.R. TPP Countries Sign New CPTPP Agreement without U.S. Participation. Congressional Research Service, 2018, March 9. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IN10822.pdf (accessed July 2018). 7. Gurova I.P. Measuring Global and Regional Trade Integration. Evraziyskaya Ekonomicheskaya Integratsiya [Eurasian Economic Integration], 2009, no. 3 (4), pp. 60–73. (In Russian). 8. Hirschman А.O. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958, 230 p. 9. Indicators. The World Bank, 2016. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator (accessed July 2018). 10. International Trade Statistics. UN Comtrade Database, 2017. Available at: http://comtrade.un.org (accessed July 2018). 11. Izotov D.A. Integration Processes in the Аsia-Рacific Region: Dynamic and Structural Changes. Izvestiya DVFU. Ekonomika i Upravlenie = The Bulletin of the Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management, 2016, no. 3, pp. 86–100. (In Russian). 12. Kimura F., Kuno A., Hayakawa K. Does the Number of RTAs Matter? Empirical Analysis on the Spaghetti Bowl Phenomenon, 2006. Available at: https://faculty.washington.edu/karyiu/confer/GJ06/papers/kimura-kuno-hayakawa.pdf (accessed July 2018). 13. Krishna P. Are Regional Trading Partners ‘Natural’? Journal of Political Economy, 2003, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 202–231. DOI: 10.1086/344802 14. Meade J. The Theory of Customs Unions. Milestones of Economic Thought. Vol. 6. World Eсonomy. Edited by А.P. Kireev. State University – Higher School of Economics; Institute ‘Economic School’. Moscow, 2006, pp. 706–717. (In Russian). 15. Potapov M.A. Economic Integration in the Asia-Pacific: In Search of Model. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya = World Eсonomy and International Relations, 2017, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 57–65. (In Russian). 16. RTAs Currently in Force (by Year of Entry Into Force). Available at: http://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicMaintainRTAHome.aspx (accessed July 2018). 17. Schiff M., Winters A. Regional Integration and Development. Washington: World Bank Publications, 2003, 321 p. DOI: 10.1596/0-8213-5078-1 18. Schott J., Cimino-Isaacs C., Jung E. Implication of the Trans-Pacific Partnership for the World Trading System. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics. No. PB16-816–8, 2016. Available at: https://piie.com/system/files/documents/pb16–8.pdf (accessed July 2018). 19. Statistics Database. WTO, 2017. Available at: http://stat.wto.org/Home/WSDBHome.aspx?Language=E (accessed July 2018). 20. Statistics. UNCTAD, 2017. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/Pages/Statistics.aspx (accessed July 2018). 21. Trade and Development Report, 2007. New York; Geneva: United Nations Publication, 2007, 240 p. 22. Tran D., Heal A.A. Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific: Potential Pathways to Implementation. ESCAP Trade Insights. Working Paper, Issue 4, 2014. Available at: https://www.unescap.org/resources/free-trade-area-asia-pacific-potential-pathways-implementation-escap-trade-insights-issue (accessed July 2018). 23. Venables A. Winners and Losers from Regional Integration Agreements. Economic Journal, 2003, vol. 113, issue 490, pp. 747–761. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0297.t01-1-00155 24. Viner J. The Customs Union Issue. Milestones of Economic Thought. Vol. 6. World Eсonomy. Edited by А.P. Kireev. State University – Higher School of Economics; Institute ‘Economic School’. Moscow, 2006, pp. 696–705. (In Russian). 25. Wonnacott P., Lutz M. Is There a Case For Free Trade Areas? Free Trade Areas and U.S. Trade Policy. Edited by J. Schott. Washington: Institute for International Economics, 1989, pp. 59–84. 26. World Economic Outlook Database. JMF, 2016. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/02/weodata/index.aspx (accessed July 2018). 27. World Tariff Profiles 2016. WTO, 2016. Available at: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wto2016_en.pdf (accessed July 2018). 28. World Trade Report 2003. WTO. Geneva: WTO Publications, 2003, 262 p. |
| Financing | The article was written with the financial support from the Ministry of Education of Khabarovsk Krai (agreement No. 3612018Д from July 6, 2018, on carrying out scientific research in humanitarian and social sciences in 2018) |