In the section Articles
Title of the article ‘Model’ Budgets: Consequences for the Russian Federal Subjects
Pages 132-156
Author 1 Roman Sergeyevich Afanasyev
Candidate of Economics, Director of the Center of Interbudgetary Relations
Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation
3 Nastasyinsky Lane, p. 2, Moscow, Russia, 127006
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-0728-2704
Author 2 Leonid Nikolayevich Bogdanov
Senior Research Fellow, Center of Interbudgetary Relations
Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation
3 Nastasyinsky Lane, p. 2, Moscow, Russia, 127006
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0003-3957-1655
Author 3 Ruslan Vitalyevich Gulidov
Candidate of Economics, Deputy Director
Federal Scientific Institution ‘Eastern Center of State Planning’ Ministry of Eastern Development of the Russian Federation
8 L’va Tolstogo Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680000
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-1542-4901
Author 4 Sergey Nikolaevich Leonov
Doctor of Economics, Chief Researcher
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153 Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0001-6936-5436
Abstract The article studies the proposed method of distribution of subsidies among the subjects of the Russian Federation based on the calculations of ‘model’ budget. The authors analyzed the real consequences of the mechanism of redistribution of total subsidies aimed at equalizing the budgetary security and clarified the method of increasing the subsidies to the least secure regions to realize two goals: 1) provide equal access to constitutional rights to all the citizens; 2) limit the burden on federal budget and decrease the level of subsidies to the federal subjects of Russia. The analysis of consequences of using ‘model’ budget was based on the Far Eastern subjects of Russia. There are positive and negative sides to changing to the ‘model’ budget method for the Far East. In case of using the ‘model’ budget there is a discrepancy between budget expenses and estimated demand for subsidies. It is necessary to fully account for appreciation factors and coefficients, population numbers and the specifics of transportation expenses of institutions that provide the access to constitutional rights, including the specifics of transport network of every federal subject. The hypothesis is that the ‘model’ budget has to be based on the norms of financial expenses required to carry out the authority by a particular subject. Otherwise the regional budgets will be based on the current actual average expenses, which will lead to the transfer of budgetary means from the northern and Far Eastern subjects to the others
Code 336+332
JEL H60, H71, R51
DOI 10.14530/se.2019.1.132-156
Keywords ‘model’ budget ♦ budget transfers ♦ subsidies on equalizing the budgetary security ♦ inter-budget relations ♦ subject of the Russian Federation ♦ Far Eastern Federal District ♦ Russian Federation
Download SE.2019.1.132-156.Afanasyev.pdf
For citation Afanasyev R.S., Bogdanov L.N., Gulidov R.V., Leonov S.N. ‘Model’ Budgets: Consequences for the Russian Federal Subjects. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15. no. 1, pp. 132–156. DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.1.132-156. (In Russian).
References 1. Approaches to the Formation of the ‘Model Budget’ of the Subject of the Russian Federation and the Impact of Federal Level Acts on the Execution of Their Own Powers of Public Authorities of the Subjects of the Russian Federation and Local Authorities. Ministry of Finance of Russia, 2017. Available at: https://www.minfin.ru/ru/document/?id_4=119017 (accessed January 2018). (In Russian).
2. Belov A.V. Is Centralism Effective? Optimization of Budget Relations in the Russian Federation. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012, 188 p. (In Russian).
3. Demyanenko A.N., Prokapalo O.M. Economic Space of the Russian Far East: Post-Crisis Dynamics and Economic Security. Regionalistica [Regionalistics], 2018, vol. 5, no. 5. Pp. 25–32. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2018.5.25. (In Russian).
4. Golovanova N.V. Intergovernmental Transfers: Diversity of Terms and Russian Practice. Finansovyj Zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2018, no. 2, pp. 24–35. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2018-2-24-35. (In Russian).
5. How Subsidies are Distributed to the Regions of Russia in 2018. BankiClub. 2018. Available at: https://bankiclub.ru/zakony/dotatsii-regionam-rossii-v-2018-godu (accessed January 2019). (In Russian).
6. Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice. Public Sector. Governance and Accountability Series. Edited by R. Boadway, A. Shah. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2007, 624 p.
7. Kazantseva T.V., Leonov S.N. Problems of Improving Interbudgetary Relations at a Level of a Subject of the Russian Federation. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2006, no. 1, pp. 29–43. DOI: 10.14530/se.2006.1.29-43. (In Russian).
8. Klimanov V.V. Budget Policy 2017–2018. Buydzhet [Budget]. 2018, no. 1, pp. 14–15. (In Russian).
9. Klimanov V.V., Korotkikh A.M. The Allocation of Intergovernmental Transfers: Theoretical Background and the Russian Practice. Finansovyj Zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2016, no. 5, pp. 7–15. (In Russian).
10. Kudrin A.L., Sokolov I.А. Fiscal Rules as an Instrument of Balanced Budget Policy. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 2017, no. 11, pp. 5–32. (In Russian).
11. Leonov S.N. Financial Conditions of Real Development. Economy of the Far East: Reform and Crisis. Khabarovsk – Vladivostok, 1994, pp. 134–141. (In Russian).
12. Leonov S.N., Korsunskiy B.L., Barabash E.S. Regional Economics and Management: Economics of the Far East. Vladivostok, 2007, 176 p. (In Russian).
13. Main Approaches to the Inventory of Expenditure Obligations of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. Ministry of Finance of Russia; Department of Inter-Budgetary Relations, 2018. Available at: https://www.minfin.ru/common/upload/library/2017/07/main/8._Prezentatsiya_po_inventarizatsii_raskhodnykh_obyazatelstv.pdf (accessed January 2019). (In Russian).
14. Mikhailova А.L., Safina А.А. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: From the Past to the Future. Problemy Teorii i Praktiki Upravleniya = Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management, 2017, no. 11, pp. 22–34. (In Russian).
15. Minakir P.A. Regions’ Economics. Russian Far East. Edited by A.G. Granberg. Economic Research Institute FEB RAS. Moscow, 2006, 848 p. (In Russian).
16. Myslyaeva I.N., Naumenko T.V. Inter-Budgetary Relations in the System of State Regional Policy Measure. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya = Regional Research of Russia, 2017, no. 4, pp. 62–76. (In Russian).
17. Opening remarks by Dmitry Medvedev. Meeting with Heads of Regions at the Russian Investment Forum Sochi 2018. The Government of Russia. 2018, 16 February. Available at: http://government.ru/news/31397 (accessed January 2019). (In Russian).
18. Peshina E.V. Equalization of Fiscal Spatial Polarization in Federal State. Izvestiya Uralskogo Gosudarstvennogo Ekonomicheskogo Universiteta = Journal of the Ural State University of Economics, 2015, no. 6, pp. 83–93. (In Russian).
19. Program to Improve the Management of Public (State and Municipal) Finance for the Period up to 2018: Approved by the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2013 No. 2593-p. System Garant, 2018. (In Russian).
20. Russia and Problems of Fiscal Federalism. Edited by K.Vallikh. Moscow, 1993, 207 p. (In Russian).
21. Sodnomova S.K., Chikicheva S.Yu. The Need to Take Into Account the Individual Characteristics of the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation When Forming a ‘Model’ Budget. Vestnik Zabaykalskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta [Bulletin of TransBaikal State University], 2018, no. 7, no. 131–138. (In Russian).
22. Sorokina T.V. Regional Features of Budgeting and Financial Planning under the Conditions of Russian Federalism. Izvestiya Irkutskoy Gosudarstvennoy Ekonomicheskoy Akademii = Bulletin of Baikal State University, 2015, no. 6, pp. 1041–1051. (In Russian).
23. The Method of Allocating Subsidies for Leveling the Budget Provision of the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation: Approved by the Government of the Russian Federation 'On the Distribution of Subsidies for Leveling the Budget Provision of the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation' of 22 November 2004 No. 670. System Garant. 2017. URL: base.garant.ru/187556/#ixzz5eAIYLsKw (accessed December 2018).
24. The Role and Place of Model Budgets in the Transformation of State Regional Policy. Analiticheskiy Vestnik [Analytical Bulletin], 2018, no. 12, 130 p. (In Russian).
25. The Synthesis of Scientific-Technological and Economic Forecasts: Pacific Russia – 2050. Edited by P.A. Minakir, V.I. Sergienko. Economic Research Institute FEB RAS. Vladivostok, 2011, 912 p. (In Russian).

ISSN (Print) 1815-9834
ISSN (Online) 2587-5957

Minakir Pavel Aleksandrovich,

Journal’s Founder

 

Artem Isaev
Editor-in-Chief
Tel.: +7 (4212) 725-225
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Samokhina Lyudmila
Executive Editor
Tel.: +7 (4212) 725-230
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Editors
Tel.: +7 (4212) 725-230
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 
To Editorial Staff of “Spatial Economics”
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, RUSSIA, 680042

 

 

Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License