In the section | Articles |
Title of the article | There Is No Creativity Without Mobility: Anthropology of Transport in Siberia and the Far East |
Pages | 149-183 |
Author 1 | Alexander Nikolaevich Pilyasov Doctor of Sciences (Geography), Professor Department of Social and Economic Geography of Foreign Countries, Faculty of Geography Lomonosov Moscow State University 1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation General Director ANO ‘Institute of Regional Consulting’ 32 Nakhimovsky Pr., of. 903, Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0003-2249-9351 |
Author 2 | Nadezhda Yuryevna Zamyatina Candidate of Sciences (Geography), Leading Researcher Department of Social and Economic Geography of Foreign Countries, Faculty of Geography Lomonosov Moscow State University 1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation Deputy General Director ANO ‘Institute of Regional Consulting’ 32 Nakhimovsky Pr., of. 903, Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-4941-9027 |
Author 3 | Ruslan Vyacheslavovich Goncharov Candidate of Sciences (Geography), Associate Professor Vysokovsky Graduate School of Urbanism, Faculty of Urban and Regional Development, National Research University Higher School of Economics 20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-8677-5354 |
Abstract | The subject of this article is the new role of individual mobility in the development of the territories of Siberia and the Far East. The purpose of the study was to justify the importance of a comprehensive study of the phenomenon of mobility as the most important factor in the new economic growth of Siberia and the Far East after using a set of regional analysis methods – statistical, sociological, cartographic, and others. In the regions of Siberia and the Far East, the last thirty years there has been a ‘quiet’ revolution of mobility – when automobiles got a rapid development to compensate for exploding airfares, especially in the zone of non-alternative transport and especially in winter. Its role in the consolidation of communication, in the flow of knowledge, in the transfer of best practices and innovations is extremely significant. Since transport and local transport systems play such a decisive role in the development of the sparsely populated territories of Siberia and the Far East, it is natural to see the reserves for the growth of these territories through their modernization. There are three zones of transport arrangement: 1) alternative, 2) non-alternative and 3) off-road transport. In the first zone, we are talking about strengthening innovation centers in interregional transport hubs. In the second, about the emancipation of the forces of mobility (primarily of individuals and small businesses), in the third, about the comprehensive promotion of non-stationary forms of temporary closeness as a source of fruitful communication and places of birth of new ideas |
Code | 911.9 |
JEL | O18, R10, R40 |
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.4.149-183 |
Keywords | mobility ♦ transport ♦ creativity ♦ Siberia and the Far East of Russia ♦ local transport systems |
Download | |
For citation | Pilyasov A.N., Zamyatina N.Y., Goncharov R.V. There Is No Creativity Without Mobility: Anthropology of Transport in Siberia and the Far East. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 149–183. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.4.149-183. (In Russian). |
References | 1. Bergson H. Creative Evolution. Translated from French by V.A. Flerova. Moscow, 1998, 384 p. (In Russian). 2. Between Home and... Home. The Return Spatial Mobility of Population in Russia. Edited by T.G. Nefedova, K.V. Averkieva, A.G. Makhrova. Moscow, 2016, 504 p. https://doi.org/10.15356/BHAH2016. (In Russian). 3. Bezrukov L.A. The Continental-Oceanic Dichotomy in International and Regional Development. Novosibirsk, 2008, 369 p. (In Russian). 4. Bezrukov L.A., Bondarenko E.A. Factor of Transport and Geographical Location and Transport Costs in the Development Strategy of Siberia. Strategic Directions of Long-Term Development of Transport Infrastructure of Siberia and the Far East ‘Horizon-2030’. Irkutsk, 2009, pp. 110–123. (In Russian). 5. Bezrukov L.A., Dashpilov Ts.B. Transport-Geographical Location (TGL) of Administrative Regions of Siberia: Cost Estimation. Asian Part of Russia: Economic Development Modeling in the Context of Historical Experience. Edited by V.A. Lamin, V.Yu. Malov. Novosibirsk: SB RAS, 2012, pp. 147–156. (In Russian). 6. Cherkashina T.Yu. Factors of Spatial Mobility for Russians. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya = Regional Research of Russia, 2017, no. 1 (93), pp. 142–163. https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20170107 (In Russian). 7. Diamond J. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. Moscow, 2012, 752 p. (In Russian). 8. Feldman M.P., Kogler D.F. Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation. Handbook of the Economics Innovation, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01008-7 9. Freeman C. The ‘National System of Innovation’ in Historical Perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995, vol. 19, issue 1, pp. 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309 10. Freeman C. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Frances Pinter, 1982, 250 p. 11. Galor O., Tsiddon D. Technological Progress, Mobility, and Economic Growth. American Economic Review, 1997, vol. 87 (3), pp. 363–382. 12. Goldin I., Cameron G., Balarajan M. Exceptional People: How Migration Shaped Our World and Will Define Our Future. Princeton University Press, 2011, 384 p. 13. Hyysalo S., Usenyuk S. The user Dominated Technology Era: Dynamics of Dispersed Peer-Innovation. Research Policy, 2015, vol. 11, issue 3, pp. 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.002 14. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A., Subbotin S.V. Social Mobility in the Russian Arctic. Natsionalnye Interesy: Prioritety i Bezopasnost = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2017, vol. 13, no. 6 (351), pp. 1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.13.6.1189 (In Russian). 15. Local Transport Systems of Siberia and the Far East. Workbook. Issue 2. Edited by A.N. Pilyasov, N.Yu. Zamyatina, K.D. Lovyagin. Moscow, 2018, 322 p. (In Russian). 16. Making Europe Open and Polycentric. Vision and Scenarios for the European Territory Towards 2050. ESPON, 2013, 30 p. 17. Mkrtchyan N.V. Age Profile of Russian Internal Labor Migration and Other Forms of Spatial Population Mobility. Regionalnye Issledovaniya [Regional Researches], 2018, no. 1 (59), pp. 72–81. (In Russian). 18. National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Edited by B.-A. Lundvall. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992, 342 p. 19. Pilyasov A. Siberia: in Search of New Model of Development. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 1754–1778. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0171 20. Pilyasov A.N., Kolesnikova O.V. Evaluation of Creativity of the Russian Regional Communities. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 2008, no. 9, pp. 50–69. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-9-50-69 (In Russian). 21. Poturaeva A.V. New Methods of Research Into Transport Systems in Siberia and the Far East of Russia. Nauchny Vestnik Yamalo-Nenetskogo Avtonomnogo Okruga [Scientific Bulletin of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug], 2018, no. 4 (101), pp. 82–87. (In Russian). 22. Saxenian A., Sabel Ch. The New Argonauts and the Rise of Venture Capital on the ‘Periphery’. Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar, 2011, pp. 104–118. 23. Saxenian A., Sabel Ch. The New Argonauts, Global Search and Local Institutional Building. A Handbook of Industrial Districts. Edward Elgar, 2009, pp. 229–242. 24. Slavin S.V. Industrial and Transport Development of the North of the USSR. Moscow, 1961, 302 p. (In Russian). 25. The Contribution of Labour Mobility to Economic Growth. International Labour Organisation; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; World Bank Group, 2015, 34 p. 26. Treivish A.I. City, Region, Country and the World: Development of Russia Viewed by a Regional Geographer. Moscow, 2009, 372 p. (In Russian). 27. Treivish A.I. The Rural-Urban Continuum: the Destiny of the Notion and its Link to the spatial Mobility of the Population. Demograficheskoe Obozenie = Demographic Review, 2016, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52–70. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v3i1.1763(In Russian). 28. Usenyuk S., Hyysalo S., Whalen J. Proximal Design: Users as Designers of Mobility in the Russian North. Technology and Culture, 2016, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 866–908. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2016.0110 29. Usenyuk S.G. Design for the North: The Principle of Co-Creation in Vehicle Design: Abstract Diss. ... Cand. Art Criticism. Ekaterinburg, 2011. (In Russian). 30. Vasilev V.V., Selin V.S. The North and the Arctic Zoning by the Terms of Transport Accessibility. Methodology of Integrated Natural-Economic Zoning of the Northern Areas and the Russian Arctic. Apatity: Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2013, pp. 226–232. (In Russian). 31. Zamyatina N.Yu. External Social Relations of Urban Communities: the Problem of Territorial Selectivity (on the Example of Trips of Residents of Muravlenko, YANAO). Demoskope Weekly [Demoscope Weekly], 2011, 26 September – 9 October, no. 479–480. Available at: https://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2011/0479/analit04.php (accessed August 2019). (In Russian) |
Financing | The article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research project No. 17-05-41168 RGO_a ‘Zone and multi-model transport system as the basis of the new complex scheme of placement and development of industrial power of Siberia and the Far East’ |