In the section | Articles |
Title of the article | Urban Development Strategies: Russian Practice 2014–2019 |
Pages | 184-204 |
Author 1 | Boris Savelevich Zhikharevich Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor, Director of the Resource Centre for Strategic Planning under Leontief Centre ICSER ‘Leontief Centre’ 25 7th Krasnoarmeyskaya St., St. Petersburg, 190005, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-7171-6335 |
Author 2 | Taras Kirillovich Pribyshin Research Fellow ICSER ‘Leontief Centre’ 25 7th Krasnoarmeyskaya St., St. Petersburg, 190005, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-1561-2048 |
Abstract | The article continues the research cycle on the state of strategic planning in Russian municipalities. The authors provided formalized text analysis result of 82 socio-economic development strategies, that have been adopted in cities with a population above 100 thousand citizens over five year period from the adoption of the Federal Law ‘On strategic planning in the Russian Federation’ (from the middle of 2014 to the middle of 2019). During the study, a search was conducted and an array of official urban strategies texts was formed. During the above mentioned period, 75 of 168 cities included in the studied size group developed new strategies (45%). Each text was characterized using a content codifier. For each strategy, the characteristics of continuity, balance, ambitiousness were obtained; the true and claimed priorities were revealed; flagship projects presence was marked; the scale of outlined transformations in economic structure was evaluated; industry priorities were traced. Special attention was paid to the reflection of spatial development issues in the strategies. The analysis of the frequency of marker words in the formulations of the main goals of the urban strategies and missions showed that the ‘quality of life’ remains the leading word combination as it is used in 69% of the main goal description. The study revealed the attention paid to such aspects as comfort (40), urban environment (41) and space (6), citizens (24), and such qualities as auspicious/prosperous (21) and sustainable (26). Many cities are focused on innovation (27), unleashing the potential (27), raising competitiveness (19), attracting investment (11), improving governance and self-government (12). Less commonly mentioned are busyness (10), infrastructure (10). The generalizing characteristics of 82 strategies array of the 2014–2019 period were calculated and compared to the characteristics of 40 strategies array of the 2010–2014 period. It was revealed that the adoption of the law has led to an increase in the number of strategies compared to the last five-year stage as well as to a greater unification, increased attention to the project approach and a decrease in ambitiousness |
Code | 332.14 |
JEL | R12, R26, R58 |
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.4.184-204 |
Keywords | сstrategic planning ♦ urban development ♦ strategies ♦ Russia |
Download | |
For citation | Zhikharevich B.S., Pribyshin T.K. Urban Development Strategy: Russian Practice 2014–2019. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 184–204. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.4.184-204. (In Russian). |
References | 1. Buchwald E.M., Mitrofanova I.V. Ways of Integration of Municipalities to the Uniform Vertical of Strategic Planning to Russia. Izvestia VSTU [News of VSTU], 2017, no. 2 (197), pp. 67–72. (In Russian). 2. Demyanenko A.N. Few Words about the Quality of Institutions: The Regional Strategic Planning. Regionalistica [Regionalistics], 2016, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6–12. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2016.1 (In Russian). 3. Doroshenko S.V. Regional Approaches to the Development of Municipal Strategies. Ars Administrandi (Iskusstvo Upravleniya) = Ars Administrandi, 2019, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 96–118. https://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2019-1-96-118 (In Russian). 4. Federal State Register of Strategic Planning Documents. State Automated System ‘Management’. Available at: https://gasu.gov.ru/stratdocuments (accessed June 2019). (In Russian). 5. Kuznetsova P.Y. Agglomeration: Problems of Legal Regulation. Sovremennyy Gorod: Vlast, Upravlenie, Ekonomika [Modern City: Power, Management, Economy], 2018, vol. 1, pp. 13–25. (In Russian). 6. Lebedeva N.А. The Law Is Adopted, The Questions Remain. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya = Regional Research of Russia, 2015, no. 1 (85), pp. 305–318. (In Russian). 7. On Approval of Strategy of Social and Economic Development of Nizhny Tagil: The Decision of the Nizhny Tagil City Duma of January 31, 2019 no. 2-P. Administration of Nizhny Tagil. 2019. Available at: https://ntagil.org/duma/norm/ (accessed September 2019). (In Russian). 8. On Approval of Strategy of Social and Economic Development of Rostov-on-Don for the Period till 2035: The Decision of the Rostov-on-Don city Duma of December 21, 2018 no. 603. Code, 2019. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/550321220 (accessed September 2019). (In Russian). 9. On Approval of Strategy of Social-Economic Development of Municipal Formation Naberezhnye Chelny up to 2021 and to 2030: A Resolution of the City Council of the Municipality of the of Naberezhnye Chelny, Republic of Tatarstan on April 7, 2016 no. 7/6. Administration of Naberezhnye Chelny, 2019. Available at: https://nabchelny.ru/upload/files/user (accessed September 2019). (In Russian). 10. Shvetsov A.N., Demyanenko A.N., Ukrainsky V.N. Destructive Stereotypes of Russian Strategic Planning and Their Possible Consequences for Practice of Regional Strategy Development (Part 2): From the General to the Particular. Regionalistica [Regionalistics], 2016, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 69–81. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2016.6 (In Russian). 11. Strategic Plan of Saint Petersburg. Saint Petersburg, 1997, 112 p. (In Russian). 12. Zhikharevich B.S., Pribyshin T.К. Municipal Strategic Planning in Russia in 2010–2014. Izvestiya Russkogo Geograficheskogo Obshchestva = Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society, 2016b, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 1–13. (In Russian). 13. Zhikharevich B.S., Pribyshin T.К. Strategy Competition as an Expert Judgment Procedure. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya = Regional Research of Russia, 2016a, no. 2 (90), pp. 181–200. (In Russian). 14. Zhikharevich B.S., Pribyshin T.К. Testing of Approaches to the Study of the Content of Municipal Strategies. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya = Regional Research of Russia, 2014, no. 2 (82), pp. 216–234. (In Russian). 15. Zigern-Korn N.V., Pribyshin T.К. Strategy of the Development of the Republic North Ossetia-Alania: Necessity and Opportunity of Use of the Regime of the Territory of a Special Organizational and Legal Status. Regionalnaya Ekonomika. Yug Rossii = Regional economy. South of Russia, 2018, no. 1 (19), pp. 110–120. https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2018.1.10 (In Russian) |
Financing | The article is based on the materials of the research project financed by the International Center for Socio-Economic Research ‘Leontief Centre’. The authors extend their gratitude to the students of the Institute of Earth Sciences of the St. Petersburg State University and the HSE University in St. Petersburg for their contribution to searching and analyzing strategical documents |