In the section Articles
Title of the article Trade Interaction between Chinese Regions and Russia: The Border Effect
Pages 24-51
Author Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Izotov
Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Leading Research Fellow
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS, 153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0001-9199-6226
Abstract The paper analyzes the dynamics and structure of trade interaction between Chinese regions and Russia using official Chinese data and assesses the border effects for export and import flows. The analysis shows that Chinese imports from Russia exhibit a much more uneven distribution across Chinese regions than exports. The results of the gravity model estimation indicate that the size of the border effect for exports of Chinese regions to Russia was larger compared to trade barriers with other countries. At the same time, the hurdles impeding the access of Russian production to Chinese regional markets expressed in the ad-valorem tariff equivalent were higher than for other countries. The estimates reveal that Russian exports to Chinese regions have been experiencing higher barriers in recent years than Chinese regional exports to Russia. The findings suggest that leveling barriers would reinforce the access of Chinese coastal regions to the Russian market, making exports to Russia even less evenly distributed across Chinese regions. A substantial reduction of barriers is likely to increase Russian imports in China thanks to the growing flows of Russian goods to virtually all Chinese regions. Accordingly, Russian exporters need to diversify their supply across Chinese regions so as to bypass the middlemen and tap new regional markets in China
Code 339+332
JEL C30, F14, R11
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2020.3.024-051
Keywords export ♦ import ♦ gravity model ♦ foreign market ♦ domestic market ♦ trade barriers ♦ border effect ♦ region ♦ coastal regions ♦ interior regions ♦ province ♦ China ♦ Russia
Download SE.2020.3.024-051.Izotov.pdf
For citation Izotov D.A. Trade Interaction between Chinese Regions and Russia: The Border Effect. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2020, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 24–51. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2020.3.024-051 (In Russian).
References 1. A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis. WTO; UNCTAD, 2012, 236 p. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wto_unctad12_e.pdf (accessed February 2020).
2. Agnosteva D.E., Anderson J.E., Yotov Y.V. Intra-National Trade Costs: Measures and Aggregation. NBER. Working Paper No. 19872, 2014, 51 р. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w19872.pdf (accessed February 2020).
3. Anderson J.E., van Wincoop E. Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 2003, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214
4. Baier S.L., Bergstrand J.H. Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International Trade? Journal of International Economics, 2007, vol. 71, issue 1, pp. 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
5. Baldwin R., Taglioni D. Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations. NBER. Working Paper No. 12516, September 2006, 31 p. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w12516.pdf (accessed March 2020).
6. Bergstrand J.H., Larch M., Yotov Y.V. Economic Integration Agreements, Border Effects, and Distance Elasticities in Gravity Equations. European Economic Review, 2015, vol. 78, pp. 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.003
7. Brun J.F., Combes J.L., Renard M.F. Are There Spillover Effects between Coastal and Noncoastal Regions in China? China Economic Review, 2002, vol. 13, issue 2–3, pp. 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-951X(02)00070-6
8. Dai M., Yotov Y.V., Zylkin T. On the Trade-Diversion Effects of Free Trade Agreements. Economic Letters, 2014, vol. 122, issue 2, pp. 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.12.024
9. Daumal M., Zignago S. Border Effects of Brazilian States. CEPII. Working Paper 2008-11, June 2008, 45 p. Available at: http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2008/wp2008-11.pdf (accessed March 2020).
10. Distance Calculator. Available at: https://www.distance.to/ (accessed March 2020).
11. GeoDist. Available at: http://www.cepii.fr/cepii/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=6 (accessed March 2020).
12. Heid B., Larch M., Yotov Y.V. Estimating the Effects of Non-Discriminatory Trade Policies within Structural Gravity Models. Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute. Working Paper No. 6735, 2017, 40 р. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/173011/1/cesifo1_wp6735.pdf (accessed March 2020).
13. Hong T., Yu N., Storm S., Gao B. How Much Does Regional Integration Contribute to Growth? An Analysis of the Impact of Domestic Market Integration on Regional Economic Performance in China (1997–2011). Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 2019, vol. 32, issue 1, pp. 3189–3210. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1592006
14. Hummels D.L., Schaur G. Time as a Trade Barrier. American Economic Review, 2013, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 2935–2959. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.7.2935
15. Ke S. Domestic Market Integration and Regional Economic Growth – China’s Recent Experience from 1995–2011. World Development, 2015, vol. 66, pp. 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.024
16. Ma J., Shi J., Luo D., Che Y. Effect of Trade Openness on Regional Economic Growth in China: Revisiting the Discussion. Applied Economics Letters, 2019, vol. 26, issue 16, pp. 1313–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1558331
17. McCallum J. National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns. American Economic Review, 1995, vol. 85, issue 3, pp. 615–623.
18. Mi Z., Meng J., Zheng H., Shan Y., Wei Y., Guan D. A Multi-Regional Input-Output Table Mapping China’s Economic Outputs and Interdependencies in 2012. Scientific Data, 2018, vol. 5, no. 180155. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.155
19. Olivero M.P., Yotov Y.V. Dynamic Gravity: Endogenous Country Size and Asset Accumulation. Canadian Journal of Economics, 2012, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 64–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01687.x
20. Partridge M.D., Yang B., Chen A. Do Border Effects Alter Regional Development: Evidence from China. University Library of Munich. MPRA Paper 82080, 2017. Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/82080/1/MPRA_paper_82080.pdf (accessed March 2020).
21. Poncet S. A Fragmented China: Measure and Determinants of Chinese Domestic Market Disintegration. Review of International Economics, 2005, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2005.00514.x
22. Santos Silva J., Tenreyro S. The Log of Gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2006, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 641–658.
23. Santos Silva J.M.C., Tenreyro S. Further Simulation Evidence on the Performance of the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimator. Economics Letters, 2011, vol. 112, issue 2, pp. 220–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.008
24. Sea Distances. Port Distances. Available at: https://sea-distances.org (accessed March 2020).
25. Sng T.H., Chia P.Z., Feng C.-C., Wang Y.-C. Are China’s Provincial Boundaries Misaligned? Applied Geography, 2018, vol. 98, pp. 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.009
26. Taglioni D. Exchange Rate Volatility as a Barrier to Trade: New Methodologies and Recent Evidence. Economie Internationale, 2002, issue 89–90, pp. 227–259.
27. Urry J. Offshoring. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press, 2014, 212 p.
28. Wang D., Wang Z., Xie Y. How Large is the Border Effect between the United States and China? Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2019, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 851–863. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.97.851.863
29. Yang Z., Ye Z. Domestic Market Integration in China: The Role of the Financial Sector. The Chinese Economy, 2016, vol. 49, issue 5, pp. 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2016.1193389
30. Yotov Y.V. A Simple Solution to the Distance Puzzle in International Trade. Economics Letters, 2012, vol. 117, issue 3, pp. 794–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.08.032
31. Yotov Y.V., Piermartini R., Monteiro J.-A., Larch M. An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model. WTO; UNCTAD, 2016, 144 р. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/advancedwtounctad2016_e.pdf (accessed March 2020).
32. Zhang X., Li C., Li W., Song J., Yang C. Do Administrative Boundaries Matter for Uneven Economic Development? A Case Study of China’s Provincial Border Counties. Growth and Change, 2017, vol. 48, pp. 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12196
33. Zhao Y., Ni J. The Border Effects of Domestic Trade in Transitional China: Local Governments’ Preference and Protectionism. The Chinese Economy, 2018, vol. 51, issue 5, pp. 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2018.147960
Submitted 05.04.2020
Revised 11.05.2020
Published online 30.09.2020

ISSN (Print) 1815-9834
ISSN (Online) 2587-5957

Minakir Pavel Aleksandrovich,
Editor-in-Chief
Tel.: +7 (4212) 725-225,
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916,
 
Samokhina Lyudmila, Executive Editor
Tel.: +7 (4212) 226-053
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916,
 
Editors
Tel.: +7 (4212) 226-053,
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916,
 
To Editorial Staff of “Spatial Economics”
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, RUSSIA, 680042

 

 

Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License