| In the section | Review, Discussion, Criticism |
| Title of the article | On the Matter of Appraisal of Public Policy Towards the Development of the Russian Far East |
| Pages | 143-167 |
| Author |
Ruslan Vitalievich Gulidov Candidate of Economics, First Deputy Director Federal Autonomous Scientific Institution ‘Eastern State Planning Center’ 8 Leo Tolstoy St., Khabarovsk, 680000, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-1542-4901 |
| Abstract | A brief overview of the evolution of the new public policy for the development of the Russian Far East is presented. Thanks to active federal policy, the Far East macroregion became a testing ground for new mechanisms and instruments of regional development aimed at stimulating economic growth and promoting private investment. Currently, there is no other macroregion in Russia within which all the possible investment promotion policy tools and measures are in operation. An inventory of budget expenditures (including shortfalls in income) relating to the implementation of measures to stimulate economic growth and promote private investments in the Far East of Russia is conducted. The direct results of the implemented policy (the volume of attracted investments, the number of jobs created, the volume of tax payments) are summarized. Although it is still premature to talk about the high budgetary efficiency of preferential regimes in the Far East of Russia, there is a widespread opinion among the official circles about the uniqueness of the created system for supporting the investment process. This view is primarily based on the high value of the private to public investments ratio pertaining to preferential regimes in Russia’s Far East. A comparative analysis of the performance of the key macro-indicators of the Far East economy and those of the rest of the Russian Federation is carried out for two comparable periods: five years before and five years from the beginning of the implementation of the federal policy. It is concluded that the active policy of creating favourable conditions for investment in the Russian Far East is not yet transformed into the desired pace of the socio-economic dynamics. Such a dissonance with optimistic assessments of the implemented measures and instruments introduced for the development of the macroregion prompts the question of whether the goals of public policy for the development of the Far East are consistent with the means used to achieve them. The starting point for finding an answer to this question is the difference in understanding the content of the categories ‘growth’ and ‘development’ |
| Code | 332.1 |
| JEL | P25, R53, R58 |
| DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2021.4.143-167 |
| Keywords | new policy for the development of the Far East of Russia ♦ stimulating economic growth and promoting investments ♦ preferential regimes ♦ tax preferences ♦ investments in infrastructure ♦ growth and development ♦ the Far Eastern macroregion |
| Download | |
| For citation | Gulidov R.V. On the Matter of Appraisal of Public Policy Towards the Development of the Russian Far East. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2021, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 143–167. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2021.4.143-167 (In Russian) |
| References | 1. Aganbegyan А.G. Development of the Far East: A National Program in the Context of National Projects. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 165–181. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.3.165-181 (In Russian). 2. Berezina Е. The East is a Complicated Matter. Rossiyskaya Gazeta [Russian Newspaper], 2020, November 10. Available at: (accessed September 2021). (In Russian). 3. Business Navigator for Special Economic Zones of Russia, 2020. Issue 4. Moscow, 2020, 203 p. 4. Development of the Economy of the Russian Far East: The Effects of the State Policy. Edited by P.A. Minikir, S.N. Nayden. Khabarovsk: ERI FEB RAS, 2021, 208 p. (In Russian). 5. Guriev S.М. Myths of Economics. Misconceptions and Stereotypes Spread by the Media and Politicians. Moscow, 2012, 312 p. (In Russian). 6. Head of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for the Development of the Far East and the Arctic Alexey Chekunkov: The Development of Geostrategic Territories is one of the Most Interesting and Promising Missions in Public Administration. Ministry of the Russian Federation for the Development of the Far East and the Arctic, 2021, Septem-ber 9. Available at: (accessed September 2021). (In Russian). 7. Krivelevich М.Е. Administrative and Tax Regimes in the Russian Far East: Cooperation between Investors and the State. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2021, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 16–33. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2021.2.016-033 (In Russian). 8. Leksin V.N. Territorial Organization of Society and Territorial Structure of a State. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya = Regional Research of Russia, 2012, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 74–79. (In Russian). 9. Lomakina N.V. State Incentivizing of Investment Activity in the Resource Region: Far East of Russia Variant. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2020, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 68–90. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2020.4.068-090 (In Russian). 10. Meeting on Socio-Economic Development of the Far Eastern Federal District. Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, 2021, September 2. Available at: (accessed September 2021). (In Russian). 11. Minakir P.А. ‘Eastern State Socio-Economic Policy’: Mission (Not) Possible? Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2021а, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 7–15. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2021.2.007-015 (In Russian). 12. Minakir P.А. Far Eastern Institutional Novations: Imitation of a New Stage. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7–17. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.1.007-017 (In Russian). 13. Minakir P.А. Stages of Development: Is a New Transition Possible? Economic Research on the Problems of Development of the Far East: Scientific and Practical Conference (November 10–11, 2021, Khabarovsk), 2021b. Available at: http://www.ecrin.ru/images/conf/2021/50/Minakir_doklad1.mp4 (accessed November 2021). (In Russian). 14. Minakir P.A., Naiden S.N. Social Dynamics in the Far East: The Defect of Ideas or the Failure Of Institutions? Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya = Regional Research of Russia, 2020, no. 3, pp. 30-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.15372/REG20200302 (In Russian). 15. On Results of Activities of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for the Development of the Far East and the Arctic for 2020 and Plans for 2021. Ministry of the Russian Federation for the Development of the Far East and the Arctic, 2021, 92 p. Available at: (accessed August 2021). (In Russian). 16. Socio-Economic Development of the Far Eastern Federal District. Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, 2021, 18 p. Available at: (accessed September 2021). (In Russian). 17. Updated Annual Report on the Implementation and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the State Program of the Russian Federation ‘Socio-Economic Development of the Far Eastern Federal District’ for 2020. Ministry of the Russian Federation for the Development of the Far East and the Arctic, 2021. Available at: (accessed November 2021). (In Russian). 18. Veprikova E.B., Novitskii A.A., Gulidov R.V. Problems of Fiscal Capacity Increasing in the Regions of the Russian Far East. Regionalistica [Regionalistics], 2020, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 23–38. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2020.6.23 (In Russian). |
| Submitted | 17.08.2021 |
| Approved after reviewing | 15.11.2021 |
| Accepted for publication | 03.11.2021 |
| Available online | 24.12.2021 |