Scientific Journal SPATIAL ECONOMICS - Does Institutional Quality Matter for International Migrants in Their Home and Host Country? A Case of Russian Federation

In the section	Articles
Title of the article	Does Institutional Quality Matter for International Migrants in Their Home and Host Country? A Case of Russian Federation
Pages	42-62
Author 1	Azamat Valei PhD in Economics Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education – Economics Institute (CERGE-EI), Charles University 7 Politickych Veznu St., Prague, 111 21, Czech Republic Senior Researcher, Associate Professor Ural Federal University 19 Mira St., Yekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-9583-6542
Author 2	Suleiman Onimisi Mamman Researcher Laboratory for International and Regional Economics, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University 19 Mira St., Yekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0003-3204-0595
Abstract	Poor institutions have been identified to hinder economic growth and development, with negative social and economic effects such as skilled human resource emigration. In a resource-rich economy, a poor institutional framework has been stated to be a key cause of resource curse. The current study used the CIS and other bordering countries to investigate the impact of both home and destination country institutional quality on migration flows to the Russian Federation. Is the Quality of Institutions (Origin and Host Countries) Important in Migration? The study demonstrated that institutional quality matters for migration from surrounding countries using a gravity-based model estimated using the Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML). Population, unemployment, and GDP per capita were identified as push factors. In addition, the study discovered a correlation between the institutional quality of the host country and the inward migration flow. Therefore, the study recommends enhancing the institutional quality of the host country to increase the positive effects of inward migration flow
Code	314.7+330.4
JEL	C33, F22, О15
DOI	https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.3.042-062
Keywords	migration ♦ Institutional quality ♦ economic growth ♦ Panel model ♦ Augmented Mean Group technique ♦ Income ♦ regulatory quality ♦ rule of law ♦ corruption ♦ CIS countries ♦ Russia
Download	SE.2022.3.042-062.Valei.pdf
For citation	Valei A., Mamman S.O. Does Institutional Quality Matter for International Migrants in Their Home and Host Country? A Case of Russian Federation. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2022, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 42–62. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.3.042-062
References	1. Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A. The Colonial Origins of Comparative Develop-ment: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 2001, vol. 91, issue 5, pp. 1369–1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369 2. Ariu A., Docquier F., Squicciarini M.P. Governance Quality and Net Migration Flows. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2016, vol. 60, pp. 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.07.006 3. Azarhoushang B., Rukavina M. Resource Curse: A Comparative Study. IPE. Working Papers. 30/2014, 2014, 38 p. Available at: https://www.ipe-berlin.org/fileadmin/institut-ipe/Dokumente/Working_Papers/ipe_working_paper_30.pdf (accessed April 2022). 4. Barabashev A.G., Klimenko A.V. Russian Governance Changes and Performance. Chinese Political Science Review, 2017, vol. 2, issue 1, pp. 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0057-z 5. Barsbai B.T., Rapoport H., Steinmayr A., Trebesch C. The Effect of Labor Migration on the Diffusion of Democracy: Evidence from a Former Soviet Republic. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2017, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 36–69. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150517 6. Batista C., Vicente P.C. Do Migrants Improve Governance at Home? Evidence from a Voting Experiment. World Bank Economic Review, 2011, vol. 25, issue 1, pp. 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhr009 7. Beine M., Parsons C. Climatic Factors as Determinants of International Migration. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2015, vol. 117, issue 2, pp. 723–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12098 8. Beine M., Sekkat K. Skilled Migration and the Transfer of Institutional Norms. IZA Journal of Development and Migration, 2013, vol. 2, no. 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9039-2-9 9. Bergh A., Mirkina I., Nilsson T. Pushed by Poverty or by Institutions? An Analysis of Migration Determinants. IFN. Working Paper. No. 1077, 2015, 35 p. Available at: https://www.ifn.se/media/2gjjr1er/wp1077.pdf (accessed May 2022). 10. Bertocchi G., Strozzi C. International Migration and the Role of Institutions. Public Choice, 2008, vol. 137, pp. 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9314-x 11. Borjas G.J. Does Immigration Grease the Wheels of the Labor Market? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 69–133. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2001.0011 12. Burakov D. Energy Efficiency in Rent Seeking Economies: Is Credit Capable of Breaking the Energy Curse? International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2015, vol. 5, issue 3, pp. 677–685. 13. Chudinovskikh O., Denisenko M. Russia: A Migration System with Soviet Roots. Migration Information Source, 2017, 18 May. Available at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/russia-migration-system-soviet-roots (accessed June 2022). 14. Cooper R. Give Us Your Best and Brightest: The Global Hunt for Talent and Its Impact on the Developing World: Review. Foreign Affairs, 2006, vol. 85, no. 2, p. 191. https://doi.org/10.2307/20031931 15. Corruption Perceptions Index for Russia. Transparency International, 2020. Available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/rus (accessed May 2022). 16. Docquier F., Peri G., Ruyssen I. The Cross-Country Determinants of Potential and Actual Migration. International Migration Review, 2014, vol. 48, pp. S37–S99. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12137 17. Edo A., Rapoport H. Minimum Wages and the Labor Market Effects of Immigration. Labour Economics, 2019, vol. 61. 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101753 18. Gel’man V., Zavadskaya M. Explaining Bad Governance in Russia: Institutions and Incentives. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 634, 2020, 6 p. Available at: https://www.ponarseurasia.org/wp-content/uploads/attachments/Pepm634_Gelman-Zavadskaya_January2020_1.pdf (accessed May 2022). 19. Gignarta T.S., Guan Z.Z., Borojo D.G. The Impacts of Economic Freedom and Institutional Quality on Migration from African Countries. South African Journal of Economics, 2020, vol. 88, issue 3, pp. 242–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12254 20. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 2003, vol. 115, issue 1, pp. 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7 21. Kapur D. Diaspora, Development, and Democracy: The Domestic Impact of International Migration from India. Princeton University Press, 2010, 344 p. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835089 22. Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2011, vol. 3, issue 2, pp. 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046 23. Li X., McHale J., Zhou X. Does Brain Drain Lead to Institutional Gain? The World Economy, 2017, vol. 40, issue 7, pp. 1454–1472. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12407 24. Martin S.F. Environmental Change and Migration: What We Know? Policy Briefs, 2013, no. 2, 12 p. Available at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/environmental-change-and-migration-what-we-know (accessed May 2022). 25. Nga Ndjobo P.M., Certo Simoes N. Institutions and Brain Drain: The Role of Business Start-Up Regulations. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2020, vol. 13, issue 7, pp. 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1815333 26. Nifo A., Vecchione G. Do Institutions Play a Role in Skilled Migration? The Case of Italy. Regional Studies, 2014, vol. 48, issue 10, pp. 1628–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.835799 27. Pesaran M.H. A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in The Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2007, vol. 22, issue 2, pp. 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951 28. Pfutze T. Does Migration Promote Democratization? Evidence from the Mexican Transition. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2012, vol. 40, issue 2, pp. 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.01.004 29. Piper N., Rother S. Migration and Democracy: Citizenship and Human Rights from a Multi-Level Perspective. In International Migration, 2015, vol. 53, issue 3, pp. 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12186 30. Poprawe M. On the Relationship between Corruption and Migration: Empirical Evidence from a Gravity Model of Migration. Public Choice, 2015, vol. 163, pp. 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0255-x 31. Puffer S.M., McCarthy D.J. Can Russia’s State-Managed, Network Capitalism be Competitive? Institutional Pull Versus Institutional Push. Journal of World Business, 2007, vol. 42, issue 1, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.08.008 32. Reuveny R. Climate Change-Induced Migration and Violent Conflict. Political Geography, 2007, vol. 26, issue 6, pp. 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.05.001 33. Santos Silva J.M.C., Tenreyro S. On the Existence of the Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Poisson Regression. Economics Letters, 2010, vol. 107, issue 2, pp. 310–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.020 34. Seyoum B. Formal Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment. Thunderbird International Business Review, 2009, vol. 51, issue 2, pp. 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20256 35. Top 25 Destinations of International Migrants. Migration Policy Institute, 2019. Available at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/top-25-destinations-international-migrants (accessed May 2022). 36. Tran N.T.M., Cameron M.P., Poot J. International Migration and Institutional Quality in the Home Country: It Matters Where You Go and How Long You Stay! IZA. Discussion Paper Series No. 10945, 2017, 30 p. Available at: https://docs.iza.org/dp10945.pdf (accessed April 2022). 37. Tran N.T.M., Cameron M.P., Poot J. Local Institutional Quality and Return Migration: Evidence from Viet Nam. International Migration, 2019, vol. 57, issue 4, pp. 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12451 38. World Investment Report. Global Value Chains Investment and Trade for Development. UNCTAD. New York; Geneva, 2013, 236 p. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2013_en.pdf (accessed April 2022). 39. World Migration Report 2020. International Organization for Migration, 2020, 480 p. Available at: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf (accessed June 2022). 40. Worldwide Governance Indicators 2020. World Bank, 2020. Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ (accessed April 2022).
Financing	The research funding from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Ural Federal University project within the Priority-2030 Program) is gratefully acknowledged
Submitted	30.03.2022
Approved after reviewing	02.06.2022
Accepted for publication	22.07.2022
Available online	30.09.2022