| In the section | Articles |
| Title of the article | Estimating the Effects of Economic Interactions in a Hierarchically Organized Space: Possibilities of the Balance Method |
| Pages | 9-35 |
| Author |
Natalya Gennadievna Dzhurka Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Senior Research Fellow Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-9242-5636 |
| Abstract | In this paper we discuss the capabilities of input-output tables for obtaining the estimates of system effects generated by interregional interactions in the hierarchically organized space. Two options of integrating the concepts of interregional interactions and central place are presented, one of which implies the a priori, the other – the a posteriori solution to the problem of identifying (constructing) a market hierarchy. While the first one is used only in situations when the system effects are reduced to the spill-over of economic activity from the periphery to the center, the second one is used in more general situations when the system effects include not only spill-over effects but also the feedback effects. We consider the feedback loop input-output analysis, which allows us to get a posteriori estimates of regions distribution by the levels of spatial hierarchy. And determine that it had varying effectiveness for the cases of Japan and Russia. In accordance with the existing methods of decomposition of spatial multipliers the system effects of interregional interactions are determined, on the one hand, as a residual multiplier effect obtained after identifying the effects of intra-regional interactions, on the other hand, as a result of superposition of the effects of interregional interactions within the framework of dyads, triads, tetrads, etc. composed of regions. In order to obtain estimates of the system effects generated by interactions on markets of different levels (provided that these levels are identified), we propose the method of localizable partition, organizing the calculation of the structural blocks of spatial multipliers in the ‘from the general to the particular’ logic (from the system effects of interactions on the national market to the effects of interactions on local markets). On the basis of this method, we estimate the size and structure of the system effects absorbed by the economies of the three central regions of Japan (Kanto, Chubu, Kinki), which form the core of the national economic space |
| Code | 330.4+332.1 |
| JEL | C18, R12, R15 |
| DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.4.009-035 |
| Keywords | interregional balance ♦ system effect ♦ spatial hierarchy ♦ structure of interactions ♦ concept of interregional interactions ♦ concept of central place ♦ spatial multiplier ♦ decomposition ♦ localizable partition method ♦ region |
| Download | |
| For citation | Dzhurka N.G. Estimating the Effects of Economic Interactions in a Hierarchically Organized Space: Possibilities of the Balance Method. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2022, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 9–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.4.009-035 (In Russian) |
| References | 1. Corrado L., Fingleton B. Where is the Economics in Spatial Econometrics? Journal of Regional Science, 2012, vol. 52, issue 2, pp. 210–239. 2. Dzhurka N.G. Spatial Markets in a National Framework: Measurement Issues. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2021, no. 4, pp. 16–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2021.4.016-040 (In Russian). 3. Granberg A.G., Suslov V.I., Suspitsyn S.A. Multiregional System: Economic and Mathematical Research. Novosibirsk, 2007, 371 p. (In Russian). 4. Granberg A.G., Suspitsyn S.A. Introduction to the System Modeling of the National Economy. Novosibirsk, 1988, 304 p. (In Russian). 5. Hamilton J.R., Robison M.H., Whittlesey N.K., Ellis J. Interregional Spillovers in Regional Impact Assessment: New Mexico, Texas, and the Supreme Court. Growth and Change, 1994, vol. 25, issue 1, pp. 75–89. 6. Kotov A.V. Options for the Spatial Development of Russia in the Context of Interregional Interactions. Problemy Prognozirovaniya = Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2021, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 318–324. (In Russian). 7. Leontief W., Chenery H.B., Clark P.G., Duesenberry J.S., Ferguson A.R., Grosse A.P., Grosse R.H., Hozman M., Isard W., Kistin H. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. Theoretical and Empirical Explorations in Input-Output Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953, 561 p. 8. Metzler L.A. A Multiple-Region Theory of Income and Trade. Econometrica, 1950, vol. 18, issue 4, pp. 329–354. 9. Miller R. Interregional Feedbacks in Input-Output Models: Some Experimental Results. Western Economic Journal, 1969, vol. 7, issue 1, pp. 41–50. 10. Miyazawa K. Internal and External Matrix Multipliers in the Input-Output Model. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 1966, vol. 7, issue 1, pp. 38–55. 11. Montania C.V., Marquez M.A., Fernandez-Nunez T., Hewings G.J.D. Spatial Shift-Share Analysis: Some New Developments. Papers in Regional Science, 2021, vol. 100, issue 2, pp. 305–325. 12. Moses L.N. The Stability of Interregional Trading Patterns and Input-Output Analysis. The American Economic Review, 1955, vol. 45, issue 5, pp. 803–826. 13. Oosterhaven J. On the Plausibility of the Supply-Driven Input-Output Model. Journal of Regional Science, 1988, vol. 28, issue 2, pp. 203–217. 14. Oosterhaven J. The Supply-Driven Input-Output Model: A New Interpretation but Still Implausible. Journal of Regional Science, 1989, vol. 29, issue 3, pp. 459–465. 15. Parr J.B. Interaction in an Urban System: Aspects of Trade and Commuting. Economic Geography, 1987, vol. 63, issue 3, pp. 223–240. 16. Pyatt G., Round J.I. Accounting and Fixed Price Multipliers in a Social Accounting Matrix Framework. The Economic Journal, 1979, vol. 89, issue 356, pp. 850–873. 17. Robison M.H., Hamilton J.R., Connaughton K.P., Meyer N., Coupal R. Spatial Diffusion of Economic Impacts in Development Benefits in Hierarchically Structured Trade Regions: An Empirical Application of Central Place-Based Input-Output Analysis. Review of Regional Studies, 1993, vol. 23, issue 3, pp. 307–326. 18. Robison M.H., Miller J.R. Central Place Theory and Intercommunity Input-Output Analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 1991, vol. 70, issue 4, pp. 399–417. 19. Round J.I. Compensating Feedback Effects in Interregional Input-Output Models. Journal of Regional Science, 1979, vol. 19, issue 2, pp. 145–155. 20. Round J.I. Decomposing Multipliers for Economic Systems Involving Regional and World Trade. The Economic Journal, 1985, vol. 95, issue 378, pp. 383–399. 21. Shirov A.A. Assessment of Interregional Economic Interactions Using Statistics of Freight Railway Transportation. Problemy Prognozirovaniya = Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2020, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 153–161. (In Russian). 22. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D. Economic Complexity as Network Complication: Multiregional Input-Output Structural Path Analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 1998, vol. 32, issue 3, pp. 407–436. 23. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D. Hierarchies of Regional Sub-Structures and Their Multipliers within Input-Output Systems: Miyazawa Revisited. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 1993, vol. 34, issue 1, pp. 33–44. 24. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D., Gazel R. The Structure of Multi-Regional Trade Flows: Hierarchy, Feedbacks and Spatial Linkages. The Annals of Regional Science, 1995, vol. 29, issue 4, pp. 409–430. 25. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D., Guo J., Hulu E. Interpreting Spatial Economic Structure: Feedback Loops in the Indonesian Interregional Economy, 1980, 1985. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1997a, vol. 27, issue 3, pp. 325–342. 26. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D., Lee J.K. Interpreting Spatial Economic Structure and Spatial Multipliers: Three Perspectives. Geographical Analysis, 1994, vol. 26, issue 2, pp. 124–151. 27. Sonis M., Hewings G.J.D., Sulistyowati S. Block Structural Path Analysis: Applications to Structural Changes in the Indonesian Economy. Economic Systems Research, 1997b, vol. 9, issue 3, pp. 265–280. 28. Sonis M., Oosterhaven J., Hewings J.D. Spatial Economic Structure and Structural Changes in the EC: Feedback Loop Input-Output Analysis. Economic Systems Research, 1993, vol. 5, issue 2, pp. 173–184. 29. Suslov V.I. Measuring the Effects of Interregional Interactions: Models, Methods, Results. Novosibirsk, 1991, 252 p. (In Russian). 30. Suslov V.I. Multiregional Optimization Model: Real Value and Modern Specification. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya = Regional Research of Russia, 2011, no. 2, pp. 19–45. (In Russian). 31. Timiryanova V.M., Zimin A.F., Yusupov K.M. Economic Activity of Territories: Compara-tive Analysis of the Spatial Effects Assessing Methods. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2021, no. 4, pp. 41–68. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2021.4.041-068 (In Russian). 32. Wolf L.J., Anselin L., Arribas-Bel D., Mobley L.R. On Spatial and Platial Dependence: Examining Shrinkage in Spatially Dependent Multilevel Models. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2021, vol. 111, issue 6, pp. 1679–1691. 33. Zakharchenko N.G. Structural Core of the Region’s Economic System: Assessment Methods. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2014, no. 3, pp. 111–137. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2014.3.111-137 (In Russian). |
| Submitted | 19.10.2022 |
| Approved after reviewing | 31.10.2022 |
| Accepted for publication | 10.11.2022 |
| Available online | 26.12.2022 |