| In the section | Articles |
| Title of the article | Institutional Effects and Innovative Development of Russian Regions |
| Pages | 113-135 |
| Author 1 | Svetlana Victorovna Doroshenko Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Head of the Sector for Research on Adaptation of Regional System Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the RAS 29 Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation Professor of the Economics Department Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin 19 Mira St., 620002, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-8282-6062 |
| Author 2 | Irina Sergeevna Shorokhova Senior Lecturer, Department of Economics Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin 19 Mira St., 620002, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0003-2854-4846 |
| Abstract | The heterogeneity of the national socio-economic space implies the assessment of regional peculiarities of innovation activity responses to localized sets of various resources that contribute to its activation. One of the most important elements in the composition of these sets of resources is the institutional conditions in the respective territory, the diversity of which at a given degree of technological and economic development can bear different results. These assumptions served as the basis for the present study, the purpose of which is to substantiate the manifestation of various institutional effects arising in Russian regions and to assess their impact on innovative development. In this study, the authors understand institutional factors as scientific and educational potential, the level of bureaucracy as one of the consequences of the local specificity of managerial impacts, the level of criminality, and entrepreneurial activity. The subject of the study is institutional effects resulting from the action of institutional factors affecting the innovative development of Russian regions. The aim is to assess the influence of institutional effects, i.e. scientific and educational environment, entrepreneurial, criminogenic, and bureaucratic, on the level of innovative development of regions. Panel data on 83 subjects of the Russian Federation for the period between the years 2000 and 2020 were used as the information basis. The peculiarity of the study is the use of the quantile regression method. The results of the study reveal positive influence of the effects of scientific and educational environment, and entrepreneurship and negative influence of the bureaucratic effect for all groups of regions. The inverse U-shaped relation between the criminogenic effect and innovation activity was confirmed for 80% of regions. It was found that the quality of institutions and the development of small entrepreneurship are more significant for regions with a low level of innovation activity than for regions that are innovation leaders |
| Code | 330.34 |
| JEL | C32, R1, R11, R15 |
| DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.3.113-135 |
| Keywords | institutional factors, institutional effect, innovative development, scientific and educational potential, level of bureaucracy, level of criminality, entrepreneurial activity, evaluation, quantile regressions, region, Russia |
| Download | |
| For citation | Doroshenko S.V., Shorokhova I.S. Institutional Effects and Innovative Development of Russian Regions. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2023, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 113–135. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.3.113-135 (In Russian) |
| References | 1. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Lehmann E.E. The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 2013, vol. 41, pp. 757–774. 2. Animitsa E.G., Animitsa P.E. Spatial Projection of Innovative Economy. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii = Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 2010, no. 4, pp. 102–107. (In Russian). 3. Baburin V.L., Zemtsov S.P. Factor of Patent Activity in the Regions of Russia. Mir Ekonomiki i Upravleniya = World of Economics and Management, 2016, no. 16 (1), pp. 86–100. (In Russian). 4. Broekel T., Brenner T. Regional Factors and Innovativeness – An Empirical Analysis of Four German Industries. The Annals of Regional Science, 2011, vol. 47, issue 1, pp. 169–194. 5. Charlot S., Crescenzi R., Musolesi A. Econometric Modelling of the Regional Know-ledge Production Function in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 2015, vol. 15, issue 6, pp. 1227–1259. 6. Crescenzi R., Jaax A. Innovation in Russia: The Territorial Dimension. Utrecht University. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 2015, no. 1509, 39 p. Available at: (accessed May 2023). 7. Davidson, N.B., Shorokhova, I.S., Shumova, V.D. The Impact of Human Capital on Innovative Development in Russia. Zhurnal Ekonomicheskoy Teorii = Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 2019, no. 16 (4), pp. 830–835. (In Russian) 8. Dementyev V.V. Innovation: Between the Cose Theorem and the Hobbes Theorem. Zhurnal Institutsionalnykh Issledovanii = Journal of Institutional Studies, 2019, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 95–114. (In Russian). 9. Falk M. Quantile Estimates of the Impact of R&D Intensity on Firm Performance. Small Business Economic, 2012, vol. 39, pp. 19–37. 10. Feldman M., Florida R. The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1994, vol. 84, issue 2, pp. 210–229. 11. Glaeser E.L., Porta La R., Lopez-de Silanes F., Shleifer A. Do Institutions Cause Growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 2004, vol. 9, issue 3, pp. 271–303. 12. Gonzalez-Fernandez M., Gonzalez-Velasco C., Fanjul-Suarez J.-L. Corruption, the Shadow Economy and Innovation in Spanish Regions. Panoeconomicus, 2020, vol. 64, issue 4, pp. 509–537. 13. Kaneva M.A., Untura G.A. Models for Assessing the Impact of the Knowledge Economy on Economic Growth and Innovation in Regions. Edited by V.I. Suslov, Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, 2021, 256 p. (in Russian). 14. Koenker R., Bassett G.Jr. Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 1978, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 33–50. 15. Kolomak E. Uneven Spatial Development in Russia: Explanations of New Economic Geography. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 2013, no. 2, pp. 132–150. (In Russian). 16. Kutsenko E., Islankina E., Kindras A. Smart by Oneself? An Analysis of Russian Regio-nal Innovation Strategies within the RIS3 Framework. Foresight and STI Governance, 2018, vol. 12, no 1, pp. 25–45. 17. Mariev O.S., Savin I.V. Factors of Innovative Activity in Russian Regions: Modeling and Empirical Analysis. Ekonomika Regiona = Economy of Region, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 235–244. (In Russian). 18. Minakir P.A. Russian Economic Space: Strategic Impasses. Ekonomika Regiona = Economy of Region, 2019, no. 15(4), pp. 967–980. (In Russian). 19. Naberezhneva E.P. Econometric Assessment of Factors of Innovative Activity in the Russian Regions. Zhurnal Ekonomicheskoj Teorii = Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 2015, no. 1, pp. 83–89. (In Russian). 20. Oudgou M. Financial and Non-Financial Obstacles to Innovation: Empirical Evidence at the Firm Level in the MENA Region. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2021, vol. 7, issue 1, 28. 21. Rodriques-Pose A., Cataldo Di M. Quality of Government and Innovative Performance in the Regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 2015, vol. 15, issue 4, pp. 673–706. 22. Rodriques-Pose A., Zhang M. The Cost of Weak Institutions for Innovation in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, vol. 153, 119937. 23. Rumyantsev A.A. Research and Innovation Activity in the Region as a Driver of Its Sustainable Economic Development. Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, issue 2, pp. 84–99. (In Russian). 24. Sharma A., Soisa C., Woodward R. Determinants of Innovation Outcomes: The Role of Institutional Quality. Technovation, 2022, vol. 118, 102562. 25. Shterzer T.A. Empirical Analysis of Factors of Innovation Activity in the Subjects of the Russian Federation. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Sotsialno-Ekonomicheskie Nauki = Vestnik NSU. Series: Social and Economic Sciences, 2005, vol. 5, issue 2, pp. 100–109. (In Russian). 26. Zemtsov S., Kotsemir M. An Assessment of Regional Innovation System Efficiency in Russia: The Application of the DEA Approach. Scientometrics, 2019, vol. 120, pp. 375–404. 27. Zemtsov S., Muradov A., Wade I., Barinova V. Determinants of Regional Innovation in Russia: Are People or Capital More Important? Foresight and STI Governance, 2016, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 29–42. |
| Financing | The study is conducted within the framework of the research and development plan of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences for 2021–2023 topic ‘Institutional models and factors of social and economic adaptation of the region’s population in the conditions of transition to dynamic development’ |
| Submitted | 11.04.2023 |
| Approved after reviewing | 15.07.2023 |
| Accepted for publication | 20.07.2023 |
| Available online | 02.10.2023 |