In the section Surveys
Title of the article Natural Resources in Economic Development: Evolution of Theoretical Approaches
Pages 136-159
Author Olga Valeryevna Dyomina
Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Senior Research Fellow
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-7992-5852
Abstract This paper considers the evolution of the main theoretical approaches considering the role of natural resources in economic development in the XVIII-XXI centuries. The study revels three main functions of natural resources in the economy: a factor of production, a traded commodity and natural capital as a component of national wealth (along with real and human capital). It is shown that at the present stage globalization processes have determined the dominant function of natural resources as a tradable commodity. It is determined that if until the end of the XX century the presence of rich and diverse natural resources ensured economic growth, then in the subsequent period natural resources had a multidirectional impact on economic dynamics. The author performs a comparative analysis of three theories that take natural resources into account: neoclassical theory of economic growth, neoclassical theory of international trade and institutional theory. In the neoclassical theory of economic growth natural resources are considered as a factor of production, which act as determinants of economic growth. This theory formulates the Dasgupta – Heal – Solow – Stiglitz model, which defines the conditions for sustainable economic growth in an economy with non-renewable natural resources. In the neoclassical theory of international trade, natural resources are primarily considered as a tradable commodity, and the possibilities of development of the economy dominated by natural capital by increasing foreign trade rent are analyzed. Within the framework of this theory, three concepts explaining different channels of natural capital impact on the economy through the connection with foreign markets are formulated: the trap of raw material specialization, the Prebisch – Singer hypothesis and the Dutch disease. The macroeconomic causes of the resource curse are identified. Institutional theory studies the role of institutional conditions in the economic development of countries dominated by natural capital. Within the framework of this theory, it is shown that the quality of institutions determines the nature of the impact of natural resource surplus on the rate of economic growth; the resource curse is defined as a violation of incentives to accumulate different forms of capital; rent-seeking is one of the main channels of negative impact in conditions of weak institutions. All the theories considered allow us to conclude that the development of the economy based on the exploitation of natural resources is possible in the long term, provided that compensatory mechanisms are formed to ensure the transformation of natural capital into other forms of capital
Code 330
JEL B40, O13, Q32
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.3.136-159
Keywords natural resources, neoclassical theory of economic growth, neoclassical theory of trade, institutional theory, resource curse, economic development, natural capital, transformation of capital
Download SE.2023.3.136-159.Dyomina.pdf
For citation Dyomina O.V. Natural Resources in Economic Development: Evolution of Theoretical Approaches. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2023, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 136–159. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.3.136-159 (In Russian)
References 1. Ahrend R. How to Sustain Growth in a Resource Based Economy (The Main Concepts and their Application to the Russian Case). Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 2006, no. 7, pp. 24–36. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2006-7-24-36 (In Russian).
2. Altman M. Staple Theory and Export-Led Growth: Constructing Differential Growth. Asia-Pacific Economic History Review, 2003, vol. 43, issue 3, pp. 230–255. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8446.2003.00053.x
3. Aseev S.M., Besov K.O., Kaniovski S.Y. Optimal Policies in the Dasgupta – Heal – Solow – Stiglitz Model under Nonconstant Returns to Scale. Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta im. V.A. Steklova = Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 2019, vol. 304, pp. 83–122. https://doi.org/10.4213/tm3985 (In Russian).
4. Auty R.M. Resource Abundance and Economic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 356 p.
5. B. Natural Resources: Definitions, Trade Patterns and Globalization. World Trade Report 2010. WTO, 2010, pp. 44–71. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/wtr10-2b_e.pdf (accessed August 2023).
6. Barbier E.B. Natural Resources and Economic Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 410 p. Available at: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/18202/1/41.pdf (accessed July 2023).
7. Bazhanov A.V. The Dependence of the Potential Sustainability of A Resource Economy on the Initial State: A Comparison of Models Using the Example of Russian Oil Extraction. The Journal of the New Economic Association, 2011, issue 12, pp. 1–20.
8. Blaug М. Economic Theory in Retrospect. Moscow, 1994, 720 p. (In Russian).
9. Bloch H., Sapsford D. Prebisch and Singer Effects on the Terms of Trade between Primary Producers and Manufacturers. Development Economics and Policy. Edited by D. Sapsford, Jr. Chen. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998, pp. 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26769-9_4
10. Boyce J., Emery J. A Hotelling Explanation of ‘The Curse of Natural Resources’. Department of Economics. Discussion Paper 2005-06, 2005, 32 p. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228383377_A_Hotelling_Explanation_of_The_Curse_of_Natural_resources (accessed July 2023).
11. Corden W.M., Neary J.P. Booming Sector and De-Industrialisation in a Small Open Economy. The Economic Journal, 1982, vol. 92, issue 368, pp. 825–848. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232670
12. Dasgupta P., Heal G. The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources. Review of Economic Studies, 1974, vol. 41, pp. 3–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296369
13. Escaping the Resource Curse. Edited by. М. Humphreys, D. Sachs, E. Stiglitz. Moscow, 2011, 464 p. (In Russian).
14. Grosheva T.A., Islamutdinov V.F. Development of Approaches to the Definition of a System of Indicators for the Assessment of ‘Dutch Disease’ at the Regional Level. Ekonomicheskie Otnosheniya =Journal of International Economic Affair, 2019, no. 9, no. 4, pp. 2401–2418. https://doi.org/10.18334/eo.9.4.41265 (In Russian).
15. Guriev S., Sonin K. Economics of the Resource Curse. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 2008, no. 4, pp. 61–74. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-4-61-74 (In Russian).
16. Gylfason Т. The International Economics of Natural Resources and Growth. Ekonomicheskiy Zhurnal VSHE = HSE Economic Journal, 2008, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 201–216. (In Russian).
17. Havranek T., Horvath R., Zeynalov A. Natural Resources and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis. IOS. Working Papers No. 350, 2015, 33 p. Available at: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201603225129 (accessed July 2023).
18. Hotelling H. The Economics of Exhaustible Resources. Journal of Political Economy, 1931, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 137–175.
19. Innis H.A. Staples, Markets and Cultural Change: Selected Essays. Edited by D. Drache. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1995, 506 p.
20. Kaznacheev P. Natural Rent and Economic Growth. Moscow, 2013, 102 p. (In Russian).
21. Langovaya V.V. Critical Analysis of the Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis. Nauchnoe Mnenie = The Scientific Opinion, 2011, no. 9, pp. 90–94. (In Russian).
22. Mackintosh W.A. Economic Factors in Canadian History. Canadian Historical Review, 1923, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 12–25. https://doi.org/10.3138/CHR-04-01-02
23. Malkov S.Yu. Simulation of Economic Increase and International Trade. Trap of the Primary Producing Countries. Informatsionnye Voiny [Information Wars], 2012, no. 2 (22), pp. 36–47. (In Russian).
24. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens W. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books, 1972, 206 p.
25. Mehlum H., Moene K., Torvik R. Institutions and the Resource Curse. The Economic Journal, 2006, vol. 116, issue 508, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x
26. Pezzey J.C.V., Toman M.A. The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles. Discussion Paper 02-03, 2002, 33 p. Available at: https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-02-03.pdf (accessed August 2023).
27. Polterovich V., Popov V., Tonis A. Economic Policy, Quality of Institutions, and Mechanisms of Resource Curse. Modernization of the Economy and Social Development: VIII International Scientific Conference (April 3-5, 2007, Moscow). Moscow, 2007, 98 p. (In Russian).
28. Prebisch R. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. Economic Commission for Latin America, 1950, 60 p. Available at: https://archivo.cepal.org/pdfs/cdPrebisch/002.pdf (accessed July 2023).
29. Resource Regions of Russia in the ‘New Reality’. Edited by V.V. Kuleshov. Novosibirsk: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, 2017, 308 p. (In Russian).
30. Ricardo В. The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation Selected Works. Moscow, 2007, 960 p. (In Russian).
31. Rodriguez F., Sachs J.D. Why do Resource Abundant Economies Grow More Slowly? A New Explanation and an Application to Venezuela. Journal of Economic Growth, 1999, vol. 4, pp. 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009876618968
32. Ross M. The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations. Princeton University Press, 2012, 289 p.
33. Sachs J.D., Warner A.M. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. NBER. Working Paper No. 5398, 1995, 47 p. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5398
34. Sachs J.D., Warner A.M. The Big Push, Natural Resource Booms and Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 1999, vol. 59, pp. 43–76.
35. Saginbekova К.М. The Central Model of the ‘Dutch disease’. Ekonomicheskie Nauki [Economic Sciences], 2008. Available at: http://www.rusnauka.com/28_NIOXXI_2008/Economics/34868.doc.htm (accessed August 2023). (In Russian).
36. Singer H. Comments to the Terms of Trade and Economic Development. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1950, vol. 40, pp. 84–89.
37. Smith А. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Moscow, 2016, 1056 p. (In Russian).
38. Solow R.M. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956, vol. 70, issue 1, pp. 65?94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
39. Solow R.M. Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources. Review of Economic Studies, 1974, vol. 41, issue 5, pp. 29–45.
40. Stiglitz J. Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths. Review of Economic Studies, 1974, vol. 41, issue 5, pр. 123–137.
41. Tapan M. On Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources: Existence and Characterization Results. Econometrica, 1981, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1431–1450. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912816
42. The Staple Theory @ 50 Reflections on the Lasting Significance of Mel Watkins’ ‘A Staple Theory of Economic Growth’. Edited by J. Stanford; Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2020, 136 р. Available at: https://policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National%20Office/2020/04/Staple%20Theory%20at%2050%20-%202020%20version.pdf (accessed July 2023).
43. Tietenberg T.H., Lewis L. Environmental & Natural Resource Economics. Pearson, 2012, 666 p. Available at: https://fcom.stafpu.bu.edu.eg/Economy/3898/crs-15010/Files/environmental_and_natural_resource_economics_by_tom_tietenberg_9th_edition.pdf (accessed July 2023).
44. Vousden N. International Trade and Exhaustible Resources: A Theoretical Model. International Economic Review, 1974, vol. 15, pр. 149–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526096
45. Watkins M.H. A Staple Theory of Economic Growth. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1963, vol. 29, pp. 141–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/139461
46. World Energy Markets Evolution and Its Consequences for Russia. Edited by A.A. Makarov, L.M. Grigoryev, T.A. Mitrova. Moscow: ERI RAS-ACRF, 2015, 400 p. (In Russian).
47. Zhukova N.А. Resource Abundance and Economic Growth: The Role of Institutional Development. Working Paper BSP/2006/079 R. Moscow, 2006, 36 p. Available at: https://www.nes.ru/dataupload/files/programs/econ/preprints/2006/Zhukova_rus.pdf (accessed July 2023). (In Russian).
Financing  
Submitted 02.08.2023
Approved after reviewing 01.09.2023
Accepted for publication 10.09.2023
Available online 02.10.2023

ISSN (Print) 1815-9834
ISSN (Online) 2587-5957

Minakir Pavel Aleksandrovich,
Editor-in-Chief
Tel.: +7 (4212) 725-225,
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916,
 
Samokhina Lyudmila, Executive Editor
Tel.: +7 (4212) 226-053
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916,
 
Editors
Tel.: +7 (4212) 226-053,
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916,
 
To Editorial Staff of “Spatial Economics”
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, RUSSIA, 680042

 

 

Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License