In the section | Articles |
Title of the article | The Economic Effects of Technological Innovations in the Manufacturing Industry of Russia and the Russian Far East |
Pages | 84-116 |
Author | Yegor Leonidovich Domnich Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Senior Research Fellow Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-1379-8053 |
Abstract | The study is devoted to the assessment of the economic effects of technological innovations on productivity in the manufacturing industry of the regions of Russia with a more detailed analysis given for the Russian Far East. The study was carried out on the materials of official statistics of provided by Rosstat and covers the period between 2006–2020 with the detailed periods of 2006–2013 and 2014–2020. It is established that on average, in the period of 2006–2020, technological innovations significantly and positively influenced the productivity of Russian manufacturing enterprises in the regions of the country. The effect of product innovations was most pronounced in 2006–2013 against the background of the financial and economic crisis and the subsequent recovery of the Russian industry. The effect of process innovations, on the contrary, gained strength only in 2014–2020 as foreign markets closed for Russian manufacturers. It is shown that technological innovations are not the most significant factor in increasing the productivity of manufacturing enterprises. In manufacturing industries, productivity depends more on the volume of goods shipped in previous years, as well as on the industry environment of enterprises and the infrastructure constraints within which they have to operate. The total effect of these factors on productivity is 1.5 times greater than the effect of innovation. It is shown that in the manufacturing industry in the Russian Far East, the effect of the total volume of technological innovations on productivity is 1.5–2 times less than in Russia in general, which can be explained by the low efficiency of process innovations in the Far Eastern Federal District. At the same time, the processing enterprises of the district demonstrate an increased effect (by 25–40%) of product innovations relative to the average level in Russia, which is associated with a greater dependence of the enterprises of the district on the fulfillment of individual orders |
Code | 330.3+311.3+332.1 |
JEL | B29, F63, H19, H59, O38 |
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.4.084-116 |
Keywords | technological innovations, productivity, Far East, infrastructure constraints, dynamic panel approach |
Download | |
For citation | Domnich Y.L. The Economic Effects of Technological Innovations in the Manufacturing Industry of Russia and the Russian Far East. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2023, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 84–116. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.4.084-116 (In Russian) |
References | 1. Aivazian S.A., Aivazian М.Yu., Rudenko V.А. Efficiency Estimation of Russian Regions Based on the Productive Potential Model Including the Characteristics of Readiness to Innovate. Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods, 2014, vol. 50, no 4, pp. 34–70. (In Russian). 2. Anderson T.W., Hsiao C. Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics, 1982, vol. 18, issue 1, pp. 47–82. 3. Arellano M., Bond S. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 1991, vol. 58, issue 2, pp. 277–297. 4. Bartelsman E.J., Dhrymes P.J. Productivity Dynamics: U.S. Manufacturing Plants, 1972–1986. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1998, no. 9, pp. 5–34. 5. Bhattacharya S., Ritter J.R. Innovation and Communication: Signalling with Partial Disclosure. Review of Economic Studies, 1983, vol. 50, issue 2, pp. 331–346. 6. Blundell R., Bond S. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 1998, vol. 87, issue 1, pp. 115–143. 7. Crescenzi R., Jaax A. Innovation in Russia: The Territorial Dimension. Economic Geography, 2016, vol. 93, issue 1, pp. 66–88. 8. Criscuolo C. Innovation and Productivity: Estimating the Core Model across 18 Countries. Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic Perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2009, pp. 111–138. 9. Domnich Ye.L. Economic Analysis оf the Structure оf Russian Mechanical Engineering: Theory аnd Practice Issues. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2014, no. 1, pp. 101–118. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2014.1.101-118 (In Russian). 10. Domnich Ye.L. Innovation As a Factor of Changing the Productivity of Enterprises: Measurement and Interpretation Issues. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2022, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 93–127. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.4.093-127 (In Russian). 11. Domnich Ye.L. Russia’s Far East Engineering Structure: Problems of Measurement and Evaluation Experience. Regionalnaya Ekonomika: Teoriya i Praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2016, no. 8, pp. 4–18. (In Russian). 12. Farinas J.C., Ruano S. Firm Productivity, Heterogeneity, Sunk Costs and Market Selection. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2005, vol. 23, issue 7–8, pp. 505–534. 13. Flaig G., Stadler M. Success Breeds Success. The Dynamics of the Innovation Process. Empirical Economics, 1994, no. 19, pp. 55–68. 14. Geroski P.A., van Reenen J., Walters C.F. How Persistently do Firms Innovate? Research Policy, 1997, vol. 26, issue 1, pp. 33–48. 15. Goedhuys M. The Impact of Innovation Activities on Productivity and Firm Growth: Evidence from Brazil. UNU-MERIT. Working Paper Series, 2007, no. 2007-002. 33 p. URL: 16. Hall B.H., Griliches Z., Hausman J.A. Patents and R and D: Is There a Lag? International Economic Review, 1986, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 265–283. 17. Holtz-Eakin D., Newey W., Rosen H. Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data. Econometrica, 1988, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1371–1395. 18. Hsiao C. Longitudinal Data Analysis. Microeconometrics. Edited by S.N. Durlauf, L.E. Blume. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp. 89–107. 19. Jefferson G., Bai H., Guan X., Yu X. R&D Performance in Chinese Industry. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2006, no. 15, pp. 345–366. 20. Mariev O., Nagieva K., Pushkarev A., Davidson N., Sohag K. Effects of R&D Spending on Productivity of the Russian Firms: Does Technological Intensity Matter? Empirical Economics, 2022, vol. 62, pp. 2619–2643. 21. Morris D. Innovation and Productivity among Heterogeneous Firms. Research Policy, 2018, vol. 47, issue 10, pp. 1918–1932. 22. Oslo Manual. OECD, 2005, 164 p. Available at: 23. Pakes A., Griliches Z. Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Report. Economics Letters, 1980, vol. 5, issue 4, pp. 377–381. 24. Peters B. Persistence of Innovation: Stylized Facts and Panel Data Evidence. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2009, no. 34, pp. 226–243. 25. Raymond W., Mohnen P., Palm F., Schim S., van der Loeff S.S. Persistence of Innovation in Dutch Manufacturing: Is It Spurious? The Review of Economics and Statistic, 2010, vol. 92, issue 3, pp. 495–504. 26. Roud V. Firm-Level Research on Innovation and Productivity: Russian Experience, 2007, 10 p. Available at: 27. Sargan J.D. Some Tests of Dynamic Specification for a Single Equation. Econometrica, 1980, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 879–897. 28. Teplykh G.V. Drivers of Innovation Activity of Manufacturing Enterprises in Russia. Prikladnaya Ekonometrika = Applied Econometrics, 2015, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 83–110. (In Russian). 29. Untura G.A. The Knowledge Economy and Digitalization: Assessing Their Impact on Economic Growth of Russian Regions. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya = Regional Research of Russia, 2022, no. 4, pp. 31–58. https://dx.doi.org/10.15372/REG20220402 (In Russian). 30. Untura G.A., Kaneva M.A., Moroshkina O.N. Phenomenon of Structural-Technological Proximity and Knowledge Spillovers between Russian Regions. Ekonomika Regiona = Economy of Region, 2020, vol. 16, issue 4, pp. 1254–1271. 31. Windmeijer F. A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Efficient Two-Step GMM Estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 2005, vol. 126, issue 1, pp. 25–51. 32. Zemtsov S.P. New Technologies and Regional Development in the Modern Period. Zhurnal Novoy Ekonomicheskoy Assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2021, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 196–207. https://dx.doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2021-51-3-9 (In Russian). 33. Zemtsov S.P., Komarov V.M., Barinova V.A. Uncovering New Economy Potential of Russian Regions on the Basis of the Last 20 Years Dynamics’ Analysis. Ekonomika Regiona = Economy of Region, 2022, vol. 18, issue 1, pp. 92–104. |
Financing | |
Submitted | 22.09.2023 |
Approved after reviewing | 31.10.2023 |
Accepted for publication | 22.11.2023 |
Available online | 27.12.2023 |