| In the section | Articles |
| Title of the article | Area Studies in the Social Sciences |
| Pages | 7-25 |
| Author | Alexander Mikhailovich Libman Doctor of Economics, PhD (Economics), Proffesor Freie Universitat Berlin Garystraße 55, 14195, Berlin, Germany This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-8504-3007 |
| Abstract | In the last decades, area studies have been subject to substantial criticism by the most mainstream social sciences. Area specialists are perceived as lacking the knowledge of modern research methodology and rather following the interests of humanities than social sciences. At the same time, studying individual regions and countries certainly requires the accumulation of specific knowledge, which would most likely be lost without area studies research. This paper discusses the main directions of criticism of area studies and possible suggestions towards modernization of this research tradition. The criticism towards area studies can be linked to three issues: the excessive dominance of the humanities in most area studies communities; insufficient consideration of modern theoretical and empirical approaches; and implicit normativity, i.e., the substitution of scientific analysis with value assertions. The modernization of area studies as an academic field is related to the application of alternative approaches to regional and country studies within three research projects: Comparative Area Studies (CAS), Transregional Studies, and regional specialization within individual disciplines |
| Code | 303+330+167 |
| JEL | A10, A12, B40 |
| DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.1.007-025 |
| Keywords | Area Sudies, interdisciplinary regional and country studies, social science methodology, humanities and social sciences |
| Download | |
| For citation | Libman А.М. Area Studies in the Social Sciences. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2024, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 7–25. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.1.007-025 (In Russian) |
| References | 1. Ahram A.I. The Theory and Method of Comparative Area Studies. Qualitative Research, 2011, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 69–90. 2. Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London; New York: Verso, 1983, 240 p. 3. Angrist J.D., Pischke J.S. The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con Out of Econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2010, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 3–30. 4. Area Studies at the Crossroads. Edited by K. Mielke, A.K. Hornidge. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2017, 363 p. 5. Basedau M., Kollner P. Area Studies, Comparative Area Studies, and the Study of Politics: Context, Substance, and Methodological Challenges. Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 2007, vol. 1, pp. 105–124. 6. Bates R.H. Area Studies and Political Science: Rupture and Possible Synthesis. Africa Today, 1997a, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 123–131. 7. Bates R.H. Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy? PS: Political Science & Politics, 1997b, vol. 30, issue 2, pp. 166–169. 8. Borzel T.A., Zurn M. Contestations of the Liberal Script. A Research Program. SCRIPTS. Working Paper Series, no. 1, 2020, 23 p. Available at: (accessed January 2024). 9. Burleigh M. Germany Turns Eastwards. A Study of Ostforschung in the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, 351 p. 10. Chandler A. The Interaction of Post-Sovietology and Comparative Politics: Seizing the Moment. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 1994, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–17. 11. Comparative Area Studies: Methodological Rationales and Cross-Regional Applications. Edited by A.I. Ahram, P. Kollner, R. Sil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 321 p. 12. Davis D.E., Trani E.P. Distorted Mirrors: Americans and Their Relations with Russia and China in the Twentieth Century. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2009, 496 p. 13. Derks H. Deutsche Westforschung. Ideologie und Praxis im 20. Jahrhundert. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 2001, 304 s. 14. Engerman D.C. Know Your Enemy: The Rise and Fall of America‘s Soviet Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, 480 p. 15. Felsch M. The Scientific Shortcomings of Postcolonial Theory. International Studies, 2023, vol. 60, issue 1, pp. 113–130. 16. Findley M.G., Kikuta K., Denly M. External Validity. Annual Review of Political Science, 2021, vol. 24, pp. 365–393. 17. Hackmann J. Strukturen und Institutionen der Polnischen Westforschung (1918–1960). Zeitschrift fur Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung, 2001, bd. 50, nr. 2, s. 230–255. 18. Hedstrom P., Ylikoski P. Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 2010, vol. 36, pp. 49–67. 19. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010, vol. 33, issue 2–3, pp. 61–83. 20. Holbig H. The Plasticity of Regions: A Social Sciences-Cultural Studies Dialogue on Asia-Related Area Studies. GIGA. Working Papers No. 267, 2015, 34 p. Available at: (accessed January 2024). 21. International Relations and Area Studies. Edited by S. D’Amato, M. Dian, A. Russo. Heidelberg: Springer, 2023. 172 p. 22. ‘It was Recently, It was a Long Time Ago…’ Edited by I.I. Orlik. Moscow: IE RAS, 2010, 264 p. (In Russian). 23. Kaczmarska K., Ortmann S. IR Theory and Area Studies: A Plea for Displaced Knowledge about International Politics. Journal of International Relations and Development, 2021, vol. 24, issue 4, pp. 820–847. 24. Krzoska M. Deutsche Ostforschung-Polnische Westforschung. Prolegomena zu Einem Vergleich. Zeitschrift fur Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung, 2003, bd. 52, nr. 3, s. 398–419. 25. Kudrov V. The Comparison of the USSR and USA Economies by IMEMO in the 1970s. Europe-Asia Studies, 1997, vol. 49, issue 5, pp. 883–904. 26. Kuznetsov A.V. The Crisis of Country Studies in Russia Amid the Growing Demand for Knowledge about Foreign Countries and Regions. Kontury Globalnykh Transformatsiy: Politika, Ekonomika, Pravo = Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Econo-mics, Law, 2021, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 6–25. (In Russian). 27. Lankina T. Branching Out or Inwards? The Logic of Fractals in Russian Studies. Post-Soviet Affairs, 2023, vol. 39, issue 1–2, pp. 70–85. 28. Libman A.М. Interdisciplinary Research and Mixed Methods: Perspectives and Limitations. Voprosy Teoreticheskoy Ekonomiki = Theoretical Economics, 2023, no. 3, pp. 35–48. (In Russian). 29. Libman A.М. Studying Russia in the Western Science: Problems and Development Logic. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost = Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2019, no. 3, pp. 5–19. (In Russian). 30. Libman A.М. The Frontiers of Disciplines and the Frontiers of Communities. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost = Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2010, no. 1, pp. 134–146. (In Russian). 31. Lie J. Ruth Benedict’s Legacy of Shame: Orientalism and Occidentalism in the Study of Japan. Asian Journal of Social Science, 2001, vol. 29, issue 2, pp. 249–261. 32. Marung S. The Provocation of Empirical Evidence: Soviet African Studies between Enthusiasm and Discomfort. African Identities, 2018, vol. 16, issue 2, pp. 176–190. 33. Marung S. Ungleiche Schwestern in der Europaischen Familie: Russische Orientalistik und Sowjetische Afrikanistik Als Teil der Europaischen Regionalwissenschaften Seit dem Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts. Kultur und Beruf in Europa. Herausgegeben von I. Lohr, M. Middell, H. Siegrist. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag, 2012, s. 227–240. 34. Muhle E. Ostforschung und Nationalsozialismus. Kritische Bemerkungen zur Aktuellen Forschungsdiskussion. Zeitschrift fur Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung. 2001, bd. 50, nr. 2, s. 256–275. 35. Pepinsky T.B. The Return of the Single-Country Study. Annual Review of Political Science, 2019, vol. 22, pp. 187–203. 36. Radaev V.V. Once Again about the Subject of Economic Sociology. Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya = Journal of Economic Sociology, 2002, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 21–34. (In Russian). 37. Ruprecht T. Soviet Experts on Latin America and Socialist Internationalism in the USSR during the Cold War. In Search of Other Worlds: Essays Towards a Global Historical Reading of Area Studies. Edited by T. Loschke, K. Naumann, M. Middell. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitatsverlag, 2019. 38. Said E.W. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978, 370 p. 39. Sartori G. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review, 1970, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1033–1053. 40. Shlapentokh V. American Sovietology from 1917–1991: An Attempt at Diagnosis. Russian History, 1995, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 406–432. 41. The Routledge Handbook of Transregional Studies. Edited by M. Middell. London; New York: Routledge, 2019, 728 p. 42. Tolz V. European, National, and (anti-) Imperial: The Formation of Academic Oriental Stu-dies in Late Tsarist and Early Soviet Russia. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2008, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 53–81. 43. Treivish A.I. Country Studies: A Team with no Coach? Problems of Composition, Me-thodology and Development. Kontury Globalnykh Transformatsiy: Politika, Ekonomika, Pravo = Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2021, no. 14, no. 6, pp. 26–42. (In Russian). 44. Wilson M.C., Knutsen C.H. Geographical Coverage in Political Science Research. Perspectives on Politics, 2022, vol. 20, issue 3, pp. 1024–1039. 45. Zhuk S. Soviet Americana: The Cultural History of Russian and Ukrainian Americanists. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018, 352 p. |
| Financing | |
| Submitted | 12.03.2024 |
| Approved after reviewing | 18.03.2024 |
| Accepted for publication | 19.03.2024 |
| Available online | 01.04.2024 |