In the section Articles
Title of the article Prospects of Carbon Neutrality in Russian Agriculture According to SSP Scenarios: Analysis at the National Level and in а Region
Pages 26-62
Author 1 Ivan Yurievich Ryabov
Research Assistant
Center for Agrifood Policy of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
82 Vernadskogo Аve., Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation
Postgraduate, Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics
Institute of Mathematics and Information Technologies, Altai State University
61 Lenin Ave., Barnaul, 656049, Russian Federation
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-9076-237X
Author 2 Elena Vladimirovna Ponkina
Candidate of Sciences (Technical), Associate Professor
Department of Theoretical Cybernetics and Applied Mathematics, Institute of Mathematics and Information Technologies, Altai State University
61 Lenin Ave., Barnaul, 656049, Russian Federation
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0001-7604-6337
Author 3 Anton Sergeevich Strokov
Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Head Scientist Researcher
Center for Agrifood Policy of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
82 Vernadskogo Аve., Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-3784-4974
Abstract Sustainable development and reduction of the carbon footprint is an important issue on the development agenda of the Russian national economy and, in particular, the agricultural sector. The study of long-term trajectories of development of the agricultural economy and the conditions for achieving carbon neutrality should take into account the expected climatic and socio-economic changes in the world, which are enshrined in a number of widely used scenarios – ‘Shared Socioeconomic Pathways’ (SSPs) and, as a rule, are based on the use of integral multi-sector models land use dynamics. The study is focused on obtaining projections of climate change and scenarios SSP1, SSP2 and SSP3 on the dynamics of crop production in Russia until 2050, with an emphasis on the development of a large agricultural region of Siberia – Altai Krai, in the context of analyzing the timing and conditions for achieving carbon neutrality. The GLOBIOM model, adapted for modeling at the level of Russian regions, was used as a toolkit. The results of scenario modeling made it possible to assess changes in the scale of production and cropland structure, greenhouse gas emissions in carbon units and the overall dynamics of the carbon footprint as well as expected consequences for Russian economy and harnessing the export potential of crops. It has been revealed that achieving carbon neutrality on the regional level (Altai Krai) is a challenge that requires a significant change in the structure of sown areas, the introduction of environmentally-oriented technologies and a significant increase in the productivity of agricultural land. The results contribute to deepening the understanding of regional economic management processes using the example of the Altai Kray and ways to achieve sustainable development goals, in particular achieving carbon neutrality in crop production. The practice of such research can be transferred to other regions of Russia
Code 332
JEL O13, Q15, Q54, R11
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.1.026-062
Keywords carbon footprint, carbon emission, crop production, sustainable development, scenario analysis, GLOBIOM, Altai Krai, Russia
Download SE.2024.1.026-062.Ryabov.pdf
For citation Ryabov I.Yu., Ponkina E.V., Strokov A.S. Prospects of Carbon Neutrality in Russian Agriculture According to SSP Scenarios: Analysis at the National Level and in а Region. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2024, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 26–62. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.1.026-062 (In Russian)
References 1. Agroexport. Statistics 2024. Federal Center for Export Development of Agricultural Products of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation. 2024. Available at: https://aemcx.ru/services-and-statistics/statistics/ (accessed February 2024). (In Russian).
2. Bacca E.J.M., Stevanovic M., Bodirsky B.L. et al. Uncertainty in Land-Use Adaptation Persists Despite Crop Model Projections Showing Lower Impacts under High Warming. Communications Earth & Environment, 2023, vol. 4, 284. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00941-z
3. Bavorova M., Bednarikova Z., Ponkina E.V., Visser O. Agribusiness Social Responsibility in Emerging Economies: Effects of Legal Structure, Economic Performance and Managers’ Motivations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, vol. 289, 125157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125157
4. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 2022. Available at: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2022-full-report.pdf (accessed February 2024).
5. Carlson K.M., Gerber J.S., Mueller N.D. et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity of Global Croplands. Nature Climate Change, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3158
6. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edited by H. Lee, J. Romero. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, 2023, 186 p. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
7. Frieler K., Lange S., Piontek F. et al. Assessing the Impacts of 1.5°C Global Warming – Simulation Protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b). Geoscientific Model Development, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 4321–4345. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017
8. Fyson C., Geiges A., Gidden M. et al. Global Update: Paris Agreement Turning Point. Climate Analytics, 2020. Available at: https://climateanalytics.org/publications/global-update-paris-agreement-turning-point (accessed January 2024).
9. Global Biosphere Management Model (GLOBIOM). Integrated Biospheres Futures, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IBF-IIASA). Laxenburg, 2023, 84 p. Available at: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/18996/1/GLOBIOM_Documentation.pdf (accessed January 2024).
10. Guggenberger G., Bischoff N., Shibistova O. et al. Interactive Effects of Land Use and Climate on Soil Organic Carbon Storage in Western Siberian Steppe Soils. KULUNDA: Climate Smart Agriculture. Edited by M. Fruhauf, G. Guggenberger, T. Meinel, I. Theesfeld, S. Lentz. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15927-6_13
11. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol. 4. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2006. Available at: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html (accessed January 2024).
12. Havlik P., Valin H., Herrero M. et al. Climate Change Mitigation Through Livestock System Transitions. PNAS, 2014, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 3709–3714. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308044111
13. Hohne N., Gidden M.J., Den Elzen M. et al. Wave of Net Zero Emission Targets Opens Window to Meeting the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change, 2021, vol. 11, pp. 820–822. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01142-2
14. Ivanov А. 200 Million Tons of Grain. Kommersant. Nauka [Businessman. Science], 2019, 23 Decembеr. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4198602 (accessed January 2024) (In Russian).
15. Johnson J.A., Baldos U.L., Corong E. et al. Investing in Nature Can Improve Equity and Economic Returns. PNAS, 2023, vol. 120, e2220401120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2220401120
16. Kindermann G., Obersteiner M., Sohngen B. et al. Global Cost Estimates of Reducing Carbon Emissions Through Avoided Deforestation. PNAS, 2008, vol. 105, pp. 10302–10307. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710616105
17. Kochetygova T. About the Reasons for the Increased Interest in the Technology of Resource-Saving Farming No-Till. Altayskaya Pravda [Altai News], 2021, 21 March. Available at: https://www.ap22.ru/paper/O-prichinah-vozrosshego-interesa-k-tehnologii-resursosberegayuschego-zemledeliya-No-Till.html (accessed January 2024). (In Russian).
18. Koshkin E.I., Andreeva I.V., Guseinov G.G. Impact of Global Climate Change on Productivity and Stress Tolerance of Field Crops. Agrokimiya [Agricultural Chemistry], 2019, no. 12, pp. 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0002188119120068 (In Russian).
19. Kozicka M., Havlik P., Valin H. et al. Feeding Climate and Biodiversity Goals with Novel Plant-Based Meat and Milk Alternatives. Nature Communications, 2023, vol. 14, 5316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40899-2
20. Kulunda: Agriculture and Low-Emission Technologies for Sustainable Land Use. Edited by V.I. Belyaev, M.M. Silanteva, A.M. Nikulin, A.A. Bondarovich. Barnaul, 2021, 619 p. (In Russian).
21. Kuramochi T., Nascimento L., Moisio M. et al. Greenhouse Gas Emission Scenarios in Nine Key Non-G20 Countries: An Assessment of Progress Toward 2030 Climate Targets. Environmental Science & Policy, 2021, vol. 123, pp. 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.015
22. Laborde D., Mamun A., Martin W. et al. Agricultural Subsidies and Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Nature Communications, 2021, vol. 12, 2601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22703-1
23. Li J., Dong S., Li Y., et al. Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services in the China – Mongolia – Russia Economic Corridor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, vol. 360, 132175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132175
24. Lyskova I.V., Sukhoveeva O.E., Lyskova T.V The Influence of Local Climate Change on the Productivity of Spring Cereals in The Kirov Region. Agrarnaya Nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East, 2021, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 244–253. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2021.22.2.244-253 (In Russian).
25. Mi Z., Wei Y.-M., Wang B. et al. Socioeconomic Impact Assessment of China’s CO2 Emissions Peak Prior to 2030. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, vol. 142, pp. 2227–2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.055
26. Mosnier A., Schmidt-Traub G., Obersteiner M. et al. How Can Diverse National Food and Land-Use Priorities be Reconciled with Global Sustainability Targets? Lessons from the FABLE Initiative. Sustainability Science, 2022, vol. 18, pp. 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01227-7
27. National Report on the Inventory of Anthropogenic Emissions from Sources and Removals by Sinks of Greenhouse Gases not Regulated by the Montreal Protocol for 1990–2020. Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring (Rosgidromet), 2022, 468 p. Available at: http://downloads.igce.ru/kadastr/RUS_NIR-2022_v1_rev.pdf (accessed January 2024). (In Russian).
28. Nong D., Simshauser P., Nguyen D.B. Greenhouse Gas Emissions vs CO2 Emissions: Comparative Analysis of a Global Carbon Tax. Applied Energy, 2021, vol. 298, 117223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117223
29. On Approval of Conversion Coefficients to Grain Units of Agricultural Crops: Order of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation 6 July 2017, No. 330. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71634802/ (accessed January 2024). (In Russian).
30. On Methodological Guidelines for Quantifying the Volume of Greenhouse Gas Uptake: Order No. 20-r of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation, 30 June 2017. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/456077289 (accessed January 2024). (In Russian).
31. On the approval of the Climate Doctrine of the Russian Federation: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 26 October 2023, No. 812. Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202310260009 (accessed January 2024). (In Russian).
32. On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 2 July 2021, No. 400. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_389271/ (accessed January 2024). (In Russian).
33. On the State Program for Effective Involvement in the Turnover of Agricultural Land and the Development of the Reclamation Complex of the Russian Federation: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation 14 May 2021, No. 731. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/603604725 (accessed January 2024). (In Russian).
34. On the Strategy of Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation with Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions until 2050: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation 29 October 2021, No. 3052-r. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/726639341 (accessed January 2024). (In Russian).
35. Popp A., Calvin K., Fujimori S. et al. Land-Use Futures in the Shared Socio-Economic Pathways. Global Environmental Change, 2017, vol. 42, pp. 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002
36. Prishchepov A.V., Ponkina E., Sun Z., Muller D. Revealing the Determinants of Wheat Yields in the Siberian Breadbasket of Russia with Bayesian Networks. Land Use Policy, 2019, vol. 80, pp. 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.038
37. Rolinski S., Prishchepov A.V., Guggenberger G. et al. Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon in the Steppes of Russia and Kazakhstan under Past and Future Climate and Land Use. Regional Environmental Change, 2021, vol. 21, 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01799-7
38. Safonov G.V., Stetsenko А.V., Potashnikov V.Yu. Dorina A.L., Safonova Yu.A., Semakina А.А., Sizonov А.G. Scenario Forecasts of Low-Carbon Development of the Russian Economy and Interaction of Socio-Economic, Natural and Climatic Systems until 2050. The Impact of Climate Change on Human Potential, Economy and Ecosystems: Report to the XXIII Yasinskaya (April) International Scientific Conference on Problems of Economic and Social Development. Edited by L.N. Proskuryakova. National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: HSE, 2022, pp. 8–18. (In Russian).
39. Shineeva A., Romanyuk E. Head of the Grain Union: Russian Farmers can Easily Harvest 200 Million Tons of Grain. TASS [TASS], 2023, 26 July. Available at: https://tass.ru/interviews/18354039 (accessed January 2024) (In Russian).
40. Siptits S.O., Romanenko I.A., Evdokimova N.E. Scenario Forecasts of Russia’s Food Independence in the Context of Climate Change. All-Russian Scientific Conference Dedicated to the Memory of V.B. Ostrovsky, 2022, pp. 55–58. (In Russian).
41. Stevanovic M., Popp A., Lotze-Campen H. et al. The Impact of High-End Climate Change on Agricultural Welfare. Science Advances, 2016, vol. 2, issue 8, e1501452. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.150145
42. Strokov A.S., Potashnikov V.Y. Environmental Tradeoffs of Agricultural Growth in Russian Regions and Possible Sustainable Pathways for 2030. Russian Journal of Economics, 2022, vol. 8, pp. 60–80. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.8.78331
43. Strokov A.S., Romanovskaya A.A., Vertyankina V.Yu., Ryabov I.Yu. A Balance Approach for Evaluating Carbon Stock and Components of Carbon Footprint on Cropland Soils of Russian Regions. Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya = Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 2023, no. 10, pp. 5–15. https://doi.org/10.52002/0130-2906-2023-10-5-15 (In Russian).
44. Strokov A.S., Ternovsky D.S., Potashnikov V.Yu., Potapova A.A. Economical Evaluation of Externalities Using Partial Equilibrium Model. Zhurnal Novoy Ekonomicheskoy Assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2020, no. 4 (48), pp. 113–136 https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2020-48-4-5 (In Russian).
45. The Battle for Climate: Carbon Farming as Russia’s Stake. Edited by A.Yu. Ivanov, N.D. Durmanov. National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: HSE, 2021, 120 p. (In Russian).
46. The Current State and Dynamics of Soil Fertility in the Altai Territory. Federal State Budge-tary Institution Agrochemical Service Center ‘Altai’, 2017, 11 p. Available at: http://agrohim22.ru/index.php/published/83--2012- (accessed February 2024). (In Russian).
47. Valin H., Havlik P., Mosnier A., et al. Agricultural Productivity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Trade-Offs or Synergies between Mitigation and Food Security? Environmental Research Letters, 2013, vol. 8, no. 3, 035019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035019
48. Van Vuuren D.P., Stehfest E., Gernaat D.E.H.J. et al. Energy, Land-Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trajectories Under a Green Growth Paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2017, vol. 42, pp. 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008
49. Wei Y.-M., Han R., Liang Q.-M. et al. An Integrated Assessment of INDCs under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: An Implementation of C3IAM. Natural Hazards, vol. 92, pp. 585–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3297-9
50. West P.C., Gibbs H.K., Monfreda C. et al. Trading Carbon for Food: Global Comparison of Carbon Stocks Vs. Crop Yields on Agricultural Land. PNAS, 2010, vol. 107, pp. 19645–19648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011078107
51. Zheng Q., Ha T., Prishchepov A.V. et al. The Neglected Role of Abandoned Cropland in Supporting Both Food Security and Climate Change Mitigation. Nature Communica-tions, 2023, vol. 14, 6083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41837-y
Financing The paper is prepared under State research assignment of RANEPA
Submitted 16.02.2024
Approved after reviewing 07.03.2024
Accepted for publication 11.03.2024
Available online 01.04.2024

ISSN (Print) 1815-9834
ISSN (Online) 2587-5957

Minakir Pavel Aleksandrovich,
Editor-in-Chief
Tel.: +7 (4212) 725-225,
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916,
 
Samokhina Lyudmila, Executive Editor
Tel.: +7 (4212) 226-053
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916,
 
Editors
Tel.: +7 (4212) 226-053,
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916,
 
To Editorial Staff of “Spatial Economics”
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, RUSSIA, 680042

 

 

Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License