| In the section | Articles |
| Title of the article | Spatial Algorithmic Bias in Socio-Economic Clustering of Russian Regions |
| Pages | 71-92 |
| Author | Viktor Ivanovich Blanutsa Doctor of Sciences (Geography), Leading Researcher V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS 1 Ulan-Batarskaya St., Irkutsk, 664033, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0003-3958-216X |
| Abstract | Decision-making based on complex human-machine algorithms can lead to discrimination of citizens based on gender, race and other grounds. However, in world science there is no idea of algorithmically conditioned discrimination of citizens by their place of residence. This also applies to the adoption of algorithmic decisions on the socio-economic development of regions. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to detect algorithmic bias in the results of socio-economic clustering of Russian regions. To achieve this goal, it was necessary to identify sensitive operations in cluster analysis that could lead to spatial injustice, form an array of articles on socio-economic clustering of subjects (regions) of the Russian Federation, analyze all articles for the possibility of algorithmic bias and identify Russian regions with potentially biased attitudes towards them as a result of clustering. The term ‘spatial algorithmic bias’ is proposed. Using the author’s semantic search algorithm in bibliographic databases, six hundred articles with empirical results of cluster analysis of Russian regions by socio-economic indicators were identified. The characteristics of the identified articles are given. The analysis of all the articles showed that algorithmic bias is most evident in the four operations of the clustering algorithm – deploying a conceptual model into an optimal set of indicators, selecting regions, choosing a way to combine regions into clusters and determining the number of clusters. Examples of discriminated Russian regions are presented for each operation. Three directions of further research are indicated. Practical significance may be associated with the adoption of unbiased decisions on regional socio-economic development based on fair clustering of the Russian Federation’s subjects |
| Code | 332.1+911.3 |
| JEL | C21, O18, R12 |
| DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.2.071-092 |
| Keywords | regional socio-economic development, cluster analysis, discrimination, spatial injustice, region, Russian Federation |
| Download | |
| For citation | Blanutsa V.I. Spatial Algorithmic Bias in Socio-Economic Clustering of Russian Regions. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2024, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 71–92. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.2.071-092 (In Russian) |
| References | 1. Akberdina V.V., Naumov I.V., Krasnykh S.S. Digital Space of Regions: Assessment of Development Factors and Influence on Socio-Economic Growth. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2023, vol. 22, issue 2, pp. 294–322. (In Russian). 2. Aldenderfer M.S., Blashfield R K. Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976, 88 p. 3. Berkovich M.I., Bozhenka S.V., Brut-Brulyako A.A. Assessment of the Socio-Economic Development of the Subjects of the Russian Federation: A Factor-Cluster Approach. Izvestiya Vysshih Uchebnyh Zavedenij. Seriya: Ekonomika, finansy i Upravlenie Proizvodstvom = Izvestia of Higher Educational Institutions. Series: Economics, Finance and Production Management, 2013, no. 2, pp. 41–49 (In Russian). 4. Blanutsa V.I. Clustering the Regions of Siberia and the Far East to Achieve National Development Goals. Rossijskij Ekonomicheskij Zhurnal = Russian Economic Journal, 2022, no. 3, pp. 63–83. (In Russian). 5. Blanutsa V.I. Dendrograms in Regional Socio-Economic Analysis: Interpretation and Verification. Scientific Visualization, 2021b, vol. 13, issue 5, pp. 1–15. (In Russian). 6. Blanutsa V.I. Geographical Expertise of Russia’s Economic Development Strategies. Moscow, 2021a, 198 p. (In Russian). 7. Blanutsa V.I. Regional Economic Research Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms: State and Prospects. Vestnik Zabajkal’skogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta = Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University, 2020, vol. 26, issue 8, pp. 100–111 (In Russian). 8. Bykova M.L. Clustering as a Tool for Managing the Economic Security of the Russian Federation’s Regions. Beneficium, 2023, no. 4, pp. 6–12. (In Russian). (In Russian). 9. Chabra A., Masalkovaite K., Mohapatra P. An Overview of Fairness in Clustering. IEEE Access, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 130698–130720. 10. Charrad M., Ghazzali N., Boiteau V., Niknafs A. NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Journal of Statistical Software, 2014, vol. 61, issue 6, pp. 1–36. 11. Ester M., Kriegel H.-P., Sander J., Xu X. A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise. Proceedings of the Second Interna-tional Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-96). Portland: AAAI Press, 1996, pp. 226–231. 12. Everitt B., Landau S., Leese M. Cluster Analysis. London: Arnold, 2001, 237 p. 13. Foss A.H., Markatou M., Ray B. Distance Metrics and Clustering Methods for Mixed-Type Data. International Statistical Review, 2019, vol. 87, issue 1, pp. 80–109. 14. Gerdon F., Bach R. L., Kern C., Kreuter F. Social Impact of Algorithmic Decision-Making: A Research Agenda for the Social Sciences. Big Data & Society, 2022, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 1–13. 15. Giordani P., Ferraro M. B., Martella F. An Introduction to Clustering with R. Singapore: Springer, 2020, 340 p. 16. Gupta S., Ghalme G., Krishnan N.C., Jain S. Efficient Algorithms for Fair Clustering with a New Notion of Fairness. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2023, vol. 37, pp. 1959–1997. 17. Hadi A.S. A New Distance between Multivariate Clusters of Varying Locations, Elliptical Shapes, and Directions. Pattern Recognition, 2022, vol. 129, 108780. 18. Hartigan J.A. Clustering Algorithms. New York: Wiley, 1975, 351 p. 19. Jackson M.C. Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Bias: The Issues with Technology Reflecting History and Humans. Journal of Business and Technology Law, 2021, vol. 16, issue 2, pp. 299–316. 20. Johnson G.M. Algorithmic Bias: On the Implicit Biases of Social Technology. Synthese, 2021, vol. 198, issue 1, pp. 9941–9961. 21. Kordzadeh N., Ghasemaghaei M. Algorithmic Bias: Review, Synthesis, and Future Research Directions. European Journal of Information Systems, 2022, vol. 31, issue 3, pp. 388–409. 22. Larchenko Yu.G. Clustering of Regions in the Labor Market by the Level of Attractiveness for Nonresident Applicants. Uchenye Zapiski Komsomol’skogo-na-Amure Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta = Scientific Notes of Komsomolsk-on-Amur State Technical University, 2023, no. 8. pp. 108–113. (In Russian). 23. Limonova G.G. Statistical Analysis of the Uneven Distribution of National Wealth Across the Territory of Russia. Vestnik Orenburgskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta = Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, 2014, no. 3, pp. 137–141. (In Russian). 24. Liu Z., Janowicz K., Cai L., Zhu R., Mai G., Shi M. Geoparsing: Solved or Biased? An Evaluation of Geographic Biases in Geoparsing. In: Proceedings of the 25th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science. Vilnus, AGILE, 2022, pp. 1–13. 25. Liu Z., Zhang X., Jiang B. Active Learning with Fairness-Aware Clustering for Fair Classification Considering Multiple Sensitive Attributes. Information Sciences, 2023, vol. 647, 119521. 26. Lopez-Villuendas A.M., del Campo C. Regional Economic Disparities in Europe: Time-series Clustering of NUTS 3 Regions. International Regional Science Review, 2023, vol. 46, issue 3, pp. 265–298. 27. Lorimer T., Held J., Stoop R. Clustering: How Much Bias do we Need? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2017, vol. 375, 20160293. 28. Lyakhova N.I., Grigoryan D.R. Justification of the Allocation of the Central Chernozem Region for the Development of a Common Development Strategy. Regional’naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal = Regional Economics and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal, 2017, no. 2, p. 26. (In Russian). 29. Lyaskovskaya E.A., Prosvirina I.I., Kuchina E.V. Economic Inequality in Russia: An Ana-lysis of Regional Features. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya ’Ekonomika i menedzhment’ = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. The series ’Economics and Management’, 2023, vol. 17, issue 3, pp. 77–87. (In Russian). 30. MacQueen J.B. Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. In: Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976, pp. 281–297. 31. Majewska J., Truskolaski S. Cluster-Mapping Procedure for Tourism Regions Based on Geostatistics and Fuzzy Clustering: Example of Polish districts. Current Issues in Tourism. 2019, vol. 22, issue 19, pp. 2365–2385. 32. Mirkin B. Mathematical Classification and Clustering. Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1996. 429 p. 33. Miyamoto S., Ichihashi H., Honda K. Algorithms for Fuzzy Clustering: Methods in c-Means Clustering with Applications. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, 258 p. 34. Oduntan O.I., Thulasiraman P. Blending Multiple Algorithmic Granular Components: A Recipe for Clustering. Swarm Intelligence, 2022, vol. 16, pp. 305–349. 35. Pan R., Zhong C. Fairness First Clustering: A Multi-Stage Approach for Mitigating Bias. Electronics, 2023, vol. 12, issue 13, e2969. 36. Robinson C., Franklin R.S. The Sensor Desert Quandary: What Does it Mean (not) to Count in the Smart City? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2020, vol. 46, issue 2, pp. 238–254. 37. Safransky S. Geographies of Algorithmic Violence: Redlining the Smart City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2020, vol. 44, issue 2, pp. 200–218. 38. Sanchez P., Bellogin A., Boratto L. Bias Characterization, Assessment, and Mitigation in Location-Based Recommender Systems. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2023, vol. 37, pp. 1885–1929. 39. Shpak A.S., Shatalova A.S., Salnikov K.N. Assessment of the Development of Small Business in the Far Eastern Federal District. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research, 2019, no. 12-1, pp. 211–217. (In Russian). 40. Soares J.O., Coutinho C.C. Cluster Analysis in Regional Science. Advances and Applications in Statistical Science, 2010, vol. 1, issue 2, pp. 311–325. 41. Sorokina N.Yu., Gagarina G.Yu., Gubarev R.V. Diagnostics of Socio-Economic Development of the Regions of the Russian Federation Using Neural Network Modeling Technology. Plekhanovskij nauchnyj byulleten’ = Plekhanov Scientific Bulletin, 2017, no. 2, pp. 205–209. (In Russian). 42. Timiryanova V.M., Zimin A.F., Zhilina E.V. The Spatial Change of the Indicators of Consumer Market. Ekonomika Regiona = Economy of Region, 2018, vol. 14, issue 1, pp. 164 – 175. (In Russian). 43. Treshchevsky Yu.I., Kosobutskaya A.Yu., Garin L.K. Economic and Statistical Analysis of Localization of Ecological and Economic Activity of Russian Regions. Socialno-Politicheskie Issledovaniya = Socio-Political Studies, 2021, no. 2, pp. 87 – 99. (In Russian). 44. Tryon R.C. Cluster Analysis: Correlation Profile and Orthometric (Factor) Analysis for the Isolation of Unities in Mind and Personality. Ann Arbor: Edwards Brothers, 1939, 122 p. 45. Van Giffen B., Herhausen D., Fahse T. Overcoming the Pitfalls and Perils of Algorithms: A Classification of Machine Learning Biases and Mitigation Methods. Journal of Business Research, 2022, vol. 144, pp. 93–106. 46. Wagner B., Winkler T., Human S. Bias in Geographic Information Systems: The Case of Google Maps. In: Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS54). Honolulu, 2021, pp. 837–847. 47. Ward J.H. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. Journal of the Ame-rican Statistical Association, 1963, vol. 58, issue 301, pp. 236–244. 48. Xu D., Tian Y. A. Comprehensive Survey of Clustering Algorithms. Annals of Data Science, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 165–193. 49. Xu R., Wunsch D. Survey of Clustering Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2005, vol. 16, issue 3, pp. 645–678. 50. Zholudeva I.I., Melnichenko N.F., Kozlov G.E. Application of Cluster Analysis to Assess the Socio-Economic Development of Regions on the Example of the Central Federal District and the Yaroslavl Region. Ekonomika, Statistika i Informatika = Economics, Statistics and Informatics, 2014, no. 1, pp. 144–148. (In Russian). 51. Zou J., Schiebinger L. AI Can Be Sexist and Racist – It’s Time to Make It Fair. Nature, 2018, vol. 559, pp. 324–326. |
| Financing | The research was carried out at the expense of the state assignment (topic registration number АААА-А21-121012190018-2) |
| Submitted | 18.06.2024 |
| Approved after reviewing | 20.06.2024 |
| Accepted for publication | 20.06.2024 |
| Available online | 01.07.2024 |