In the section Articles
Title of the article Trade and Investment Interactions in the Asia-Pacific Region: Long-Term Effects of Sanctions
Pages 42-71
Author Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Izotov
Doctor of Economics, Leading Research Fellow
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0001-9199-6226
Abstract The Asia-Pacific region (APR) is the largest sub-global economy, accounting for a large share of global trade and direct investment flows, where the major role is played by intraregional economic interactions. The expansion of trade and investment in the APR has been hampered by sanctions, the number of which has increased significantly over the past decade. The aim of this study is to assess the long-term cumulative effects of sanctions on trade and investment interactions between the APR countries in 1992–2023. The study examined trade sanctions, financial sanctions, travel sanctions, arms sanctions, military aid sanctions, and other sanctions reflected in the Global Sanctions Data Base (GSDB). Based on the estimates obtained, it was found that sanctions generally restrained the exchange of goods (by 31.5%) and capital (by 34.3%) between the APR countries. The negative effect of specific types of sanctions that were geopolitically oriented was the most significant in reducing trade between opposing countries: other sanctions – by 77.2%, arms sanctions – by 50.9%, military aid sanctions – by 46.4%. On average, trade sanctions reduced trade by 28.4% over the period, while the impact of other types of sanctions on trade in the APR was statistically insignificant. The following types of sanctions had a negative impact on foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows: travel sanctions – by 91.6%, other sanctions – by 83.9%, and financial sanctions – by 54.5%. The remaining sanctions did not have a significant impact on capital inflows in the Asia-Pacific region. The calculations showed that the effect of globalization generally offset the impact of sanctions on trade between Asia-Pacific countries, but depended on the specific type of restrictions. In turn, the effect of globalization did not have a significant impact on mitigating the negative impact of sanctions on FDI inflows to the APR countries. This circumstance indicates that, unlike trade, FDI inflows to the APR countries were much more vulnerable to sanctions. This significantly narrows the opportunities for sanctioned countries to attract direct capital, which can be replaced by responsible investments through net exports
Code 339+338+330
JEL E23, F14, F21, F51
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2025.3.042-071
Keywords trade, foreign direct investment, sanctions, trade sanctions, financial sanctions, travel sanctions, arms sanctions, military assistance sanctions and other sanctions, trade and investment barriers, globalization effect, APR
Download SE.2025.3.042-071.Izotov.pdf
For citation Izotov D.A. Trade and Investment Interactions in the Asia-Pacific Region: Long-Term Effects of Sanctions. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2025, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 42 - 71. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2025.3.042-071 (In Russian)
References 1. Baldwin R., Taglioni D. Trade Effects of the Euro: A Comparison of Estimators. Journal of Economic Integration, 2007, vol. 22, issue 4, pp. 780-818. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2007.22.4.780
2. Bali M., Rapelanoro N., Pratson L. Sanctions Effects on Russia: A Possible Sanction Transmission Mechanism? European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 2024, vol. 30, issue 2, pp. 229-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-024-09578-w
3. Bista R., Sheridan B. Economic Sanctions and Export Margins. Review of International Economics, 2025, vol. 33, issue 2, pp. 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12784
4. Bruno R.L., Cipollina M., Dal Bianco S. The Ripple Effect of Sanctions: Exploring the Impact on Global Value Chains Using a Gravity Model. Italian Economic Journal, 2023, vol. 9, issue 3, pp. 1063 - 1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-023-00242-6
5. Burger M., van Oort F., Linders G.-J. On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-Inflated Estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis, 2009, vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 167-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421770902834327
6. Campos R.G., Timini J., Vidal E. Structural Gravity and Trade Agreements: Does the Measurement of Domestic Trade Matter? Economics Letters, 2021, vol. 208. 110080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110080
7. Cosar K., Thomas B. The Geopolitics of International Trade in Southeast Asia. Review of World Economics, 2021, vol. 157, pp. 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-020-00403-0
8. Dai M., Felbermayr G., Kirilakha A., Syropoulos C., Yalcin E., Yotov Y. Timing the Impact of Sanctions on Trade. LeBow College of Business, Drexel University. School of Economics. Working Paper Series 2021-7, 2021, 47 p. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hnOl53dBqtdrDJqFZTk9rU5RPrfpY_lB/view?usp=sharing (accessed June 2025).
9. Davis L., Engerman S. History Lessons: Sanctions - Neither War nor Peace. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003765888502
10. De Souza G., Hu N., Li H., Mei Y. (Trade) War and Peace: How to Impose International Trade Sanctions. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2024, vol. 146. 103572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2024.103572
11. Fedyunina A.A., Simachev Yu.V. The World in the Maze of Sanctions: Ambiguity of Empirical Evidence. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 2024, no. 8, pp. 5-27. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-8-5-27 (In Russian).
12. Felbermayr G., Kariem H., Kirilakha A., Kwon O., Syropoulos C., Yalcin E., Yotov Y. On the Effectiveness of the Sanctions on Russia: New Data and New Evidence. CEPR, 2025. Available at: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/effectiveness-sanctions-russia-new-data-and-new-evidence (accessed June 2025).
13. Felbermayr G., Kirilakha A., Syropoulos C., Yalcin E., Yotov Y.V. The Global Sanctions Data Base. European Economic Review, 2020a, vol. 129. 103561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103561
14. Felbermayr G., Morgan C.T., Syropoulos C., Yotov Y.V. Understanding Economic Sanctions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Theory and Evidence. European Economic Review, 2021, vol. 135. 103720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103720
15. Felbermayr G., Syropoulos C., Yalcin E., Yotov Y. On the Heterogeneous Effects of Sanctions on Trade and Welfare: Evidence from the Sanctions on Iran and a New Database. LeBow College of Business, Drexel University. School of Economics. Working Paper Series 2020-4, 2020b, 40 p. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vm_wAWtuTqY63WnK0QOZq8MAMr3MaZn3/view?usp=sharing (accessed August 2025).
16. Gutmann J., Neuenkirch M., Neumeier F. Do China and Russia Undermine Western Sanctions? Evidence from DiD and Event Study Estimation. Review of International Economics, 2024, vol. 32, issue 1, pp. 132-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12716
17. Hinz J. The Ties that Bind: Geopolitical Motivations for Economic Integration. Review of World Economics, 2023, vol. 159, issue 1, pp. 51-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-022-00461-6
18. Hufbauer G.C., Schott J.J., Elliott K.A., Oegg B. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Washington, 2007, 233 p.
19. Izotov D.Рђ. FDI Infow to Pacifc Rim Countries: Impact of Political and Economic RISKS. OJKUMENA. Regionovedcheskie Issledovaniya = Ojkumena. Regional Researches, 2024, no. 4, pp. 136-150. https://doi.org/10.29039/1998-6785/2024-4/136-150 (In Russian).
20. Izotov D.Рђ. The Impact of Geographical Factors on Expanding Trade Interactions between Countries (On the Example of the Asia-Pacific Region). Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2023, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 38-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.15838/esc.2023.6.90.2 (In Russian).
21. Kirilakha A., Felbermayr G., Syropoulos C., Yalcin E., Yotov Y. The Global Sanctions Data Base: An Update that Includes the Years of the Trump Presidency. LeBow College of Business, Drexel University. School of Economics. Working Paper Series 2021-10, 2021, 44 p. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ERc5uNcTumu8gyjOhzDtRNIWgkpk03T8/view?usp=sharing (accessed August 2025).
22. Kox H.L.M., Rojas-Romagosa H. How Trade and Investment Agreements Affect Bilateral Foreign Direct Investment: Results from A Structural Gravity Model. The World Economy, 2020, vol. 43, issue 12, pp. 3203-3242. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13002
23. Kwon O., Syropoulos C., Yotov Y. The Extraterritorial Effects of Sanctions. LeBow College of Business, Drexel University. School of Economics. Working Paper Series 2022-3, 2022, 48 p. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13iFOc7khQXKDxCKANMhlmz3vxLrlh87u/view?usp=sharing (accessed August 2025).
24. Larch M., Luckstead J., Yotov Y.V. Economic Sanctions and Agricultural Trade. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2024, vol. 106, issue 4, pp. 1477-1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12473
25. Morgan T.C., Syropoulos C., Yotov Y.V. Economic Sanctions: Evolution, Consequences, and Challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2023, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.1.3
26. Park I. Regional Trade Agreements in East Asia: Past and Future. Development Policy Review, 2020, vol. 38, issue 2, pp. 206-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12418
27. Pekkanen S. Investment Regionalism in Asia: New Directions in Law and Policy? World Trade Review, 2012, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 119-154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745611000383
28. Research Handbook on Economic Sanctions. Edited by P.A.G. van Bergeijk. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, 496 p.
29. Sanctions Policy: Concept, Institutions, Practice. Edited by I.N. Timofeev, S.M. Gavrilova, S.M. Chupriyanova, D.O. Rastegaev. The Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC). Moscow, 2024, 96 p. (In Russian).
30. The State of Globalisation. Edited by R. Baldwin, M. Ruta. CEPR Press, 2025, 105 p. Available at: https://cepr.org/system/files/publication-files/255049-the_state_of_globalisation.pdf (accessed June 2025).
31. The World in the Labyrinth of Sanctions: Industrial Policy at a Crossroads. Report of the National Research University Higher School of Economics. Edited Yu.V. Simachev. National Research University Higher School of Economics Moscow: HSE, 2024, 162 p. (In Russian).
32. Yotov Y.V. Gravity at Sixty: The Workhorse Model of Trade. CESifo. Working Paper No. 9584, 2022, 48 p. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4037001
33. Yotov Y.V., Piermartini R., Monteiro J.-A., Larch M. An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model. WTO, 2016, 140 p. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/advancedwtounctad2016_e.pdf (accessed August 2025).
Financing  
Submitted 10.08.2025
Approved after reviewing 28.08.2025
Accepted for publication 29.08.2025
Available online 30.09.2025

ISSN (Print) 1815-9834
ISSN (Online) 2587-5957

Minakir Pavel Aleksandrovich,

Journal’s Founder

 

Artem Isaev
Editor-in-Chief
Tel.: +7 (4212) 725-225
Fax: +7 (4212) 225-916
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Samokhina Lyudmila
Executive Editor
Tel.: +7 (4212) 725-230
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Editors
Tel.: +7 (4212) 725-230
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 
To Editorial Staff of “Spatial Economics”
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, RUSSIA, 680042

 

 

Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License