| In the section | Surveys |
| Title of the article | Modern Arctic as the Territory of Strategic Ambitions |
| Pages | 133-159 |
| Author 1 | Sergey Nikolaevich Leonov Doctor of Economics, Professor, Leading Researcher Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-6936-5436 |
| Author 2 | Elena Anatolyevna Zaostrovskikh Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Senior Research Fellow Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680042, Russian Federation This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-7447-0406 |
| Abstract | Nowadays, as the polar ice rapidly melts, the changing environment and seascape provoke the struggle for new economic opportunities and strategic dominance in the Arctic, which is reflected in arctic strategies of the circumpolar states. The start of the Special Military Operation in 2022 partially blocked the institutes facilitating dialogue in the Arctic and emphasized the issues of defense and security in the relations between Russia and the Western countries. The Arctic is slowly breaking into two parts, i.e., the Arctic Council and Russia. This state of events does not satisfy the Russian interests and forces Russia to seek allies who can help utilize the resources of the Russian Arctic and the Northern Sea Route among the non-arctic observer countries in the Arctic Council. China that has proclaimed itself a ‘near-arctic state’ and has been implementing a multidimensional policy of scientific, ecological, and economic activity in the Arctic, stands out among these observer countries. Under the conditions of the activity within the Arctic Council framework coming to a halt, it is important for Russia to maintain and promote the dialogue with the friendly non-arctic countries (China and India), that is aimed at supporting development projects in the arctic zone of Russia and the Northern Sea Route. It appears reasonable to keep this dialogue bilateral, which should allow Russia to attract the possibilities of using the friendly states’ potential in the process of development in the Russian Arctic, while leaving the Russian participation in the Arctic Council on pause and not exacerbating the current situation in the region |
| Code | 332.1+338.2+327.5 |
| JEL | D72, R11, F51, Q34 |
| DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2026.1.133-159 |
| Keywords | Arctic, circumpolar states, state arctic strategies, near-arctic states, observer states |
| Download | |
| For citation | Leonov S.N., Zaostrovskikh E.A. Modern Arctic as the Territory of Strategic Ambitions. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2026, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 133–159. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2026.1.133-159 (In Russian) |
| References | 1. Bashkirov S. Mining from the Ocean Floor: Benefits and Harms. RBK [RBC], 2023, 20 September. Available at: (accessed January 2026). (In Russian). 2. Bennet M. Denmark’s Strategy for the Arctic. Foreign Policy Association, 2026. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 3. Bouffard T., Angelo G.D., Gundry G.F., Pitts T.R., Price S.F., Roberts A.F. Russian Ambitions to Control Freedom of Navigation and Arctic Access: Refined Data Challenging Moscow’s Northern Sea Route Claims. Arctic Yearbook, 2025. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 4. Canada’s Arctic and Northern Policy Framework. Government of Canada, 2019, 86 p. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 5. Canada’s Arctic Foreign Policy. Government of Canada, 2024. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 6. China’s Arctic Ambition. Winnipeg Free Press, 2014, 25 January. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 7. China’s Arctic Policy. The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. 2018. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 8. Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands: Kingdom of Denmark Strategy for the Arctic. The Kingdom of Denmark, 2011, 60 р. Available at: (accessed February 2026). 9. Duxbury C. The 5 Most Important Races for the Arctic. Politico, 2020, 3 January. Available at: politico.eu/article/5-races-for-the-arctic-trade-resources-supremacy-tourism-salvation (accessed January 2026). 10. Erokhin V.L. Northern Sea Route and Arctic Transport Corridors: Problems of Utilization and Forecasts of Cargo Traffic Commercialization. Marketing i Logistika = Marketing and Logistics, 2017, no. 6 (14), pp. 22–44. (In Russian). 11. Finland’s Strategy for Arctic Policy. Finnish Government, 2021, 72 р. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 12. Grinyaev S.N. Norway’s New Arctic Strategy 2025: Challenges and Risks for Russian Interests in the High North. Analiticheskie Zapiski Instituta Evropy RAN = Analytical Papers of IE RAS, 2025, no. 3(43), p. 39–46. (In Russian). 13. Guliev I., Volgin S. Catching up with Russia and Surpassing China: A New Icebreaking Fleet for Trump. The Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC), 2025. Available at: (accessed February 2026). (In Russian). 14. Heininen L., Exner-Pirot H., Barnes J. Arctic Relations: Transformations, Legacies and Futures. Arctic Yearbook, 2024, 7 р. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 15. Iceland’s Policy on Matters Concerning the Arctic Region. Ministry for Foreign Affairs Iceland, 2021. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 16. Komissina I.N. The Arctic Vector of China’s Foreign Policy. Problemy Natsionalnoy Strategii = National Strategy Issues, 2015, no. 1 (28), pp. 54–73. (In Russian). 17. Krasnopolski B.H. Infrastructure and Spatial Economics: Theoretical and Applied Research. Edited by P.A. Minakir. Economic Research Institute FEB RAS. Khabarovsk: ERI FEB RAS, 2023. 234 p. (In Russian). 18. Leonov S.N. Cooperation of Russia and China in the Arctic // Russian and Chinese Studies, 2019, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 7–16. (In Russian). 19. Leonov S.N., Zaostrovskikh E.A. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Evolution, Opportunities, Contradictions. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2025, vol. 18, issue 3, pp. 85–100. 20. Leonov S.N., Zaostrovskikh E.A. Development of Inland Waterway Transport in Russia and the Experience of China. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2024, vol. 17, issue 3, pp. 258–274. 21. Lopez-Blanco E., Topp-Jorgensen E., Christensen T.R., Rasch M., Skov H., Arndal M.F., Bret-Harte M.S., Callaghan T.V., Schmidt N.M. Towards an Increasingly Biased View on Arctic Change. Nature Climate Chang, 2024, vol. 14, pp. 152–155. 22. National Strategy for the Arctic Region. The White House, 2022. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 23. Nielsen R.L., Strandsbjerg J. ‘Nothing about Us without Us’: What Can We Learn from Greenland’s New Arctic Strategy 2024–2033? Arctic Yearbook, 2024. Available at: (accessed February 2026). 24. Non-Arctic Countries with Arctic Interests: Focus on Asia. Arctic Review, 2022. Available at: (accessed February 2026). 25. Notz D. Arctic Sea Ice in CMIP6. Geophysical Research Letters, 2020, vol. 47, issue 10. 26. Pechko K. Rising Tensions and Shifting Strategies: The Evolving Dynamics of US Grand Strategy in the Arctic. The Arctic Institute, 2025. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 27. Pegin N.A. National Arctic Transport Line: Problems and Prospects. Arktika i Sever = Arctic and North, 2016, no. 23, pp. 32–40. (In Russian). 28. Puranen M., Kopra S. China’s Arctic Strategy – A Comprehensive Approach in Times of Great Power Rivalry. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 2023, vol. 6, issue 1, pp. 239–253. 29. Selin V.S., Selin I.V. Tendencies of Development of the Arctic Sea Ports. Sever i Rynok: Formirovanie Ekonomicheskogo Poraydka = The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order, 2018, no. 1 (57), pp. 55–66. (In Russian). 30. Sergunin А.А. Arctic Scientific Diplomacy in the Context of the Geopolitical Crisis. The Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC), 2024. Available at: (accessed January 2026). (In Russian). 31. Shipping Traffic at the NSR in 2022. Centre for High North Logistics (CHNL), 2023. Available at: (accessed February 2026). 32. Sukhankin S., Lackenbauer P.W. Looking Beyond China: Non-Western Actors in the Russian Arctic after February 2022. Arctic Yearbook, 2024. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 33. Sweden’s Strategy for the Arctic Region. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden. 2020. Available at: (accessed January 2026). 34. The Norwegian Government’s Arctic Policy. People, opportunities and Norwegian Interests in the Arctic. Government Norwegian, 2021. Available at: (accessed February 2026). 35. Viakhireva N.S. The Arctic as a New Priority for Canada-US Relations and Canadian Foreign PolicyNatalia Viakhireva. Rossiya i Amerika v XXI Veke = Russia and America in the XXI Century, 2024a, no. 2. (In Russian). 36. Viakhireva N.S. The Arctic as a New Region of World Politics: Strategies of Western States: Workbook no. 90. Edited by S.M. Gavrilov. The Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC). Moscow, 2024b, 28 p. (In Russian). |
| Financing | The article was prepared within the framework of the state assignment for research of the Institute of Economic Research of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
| Submitted | 20.03.2026 |
| Approved after reviewing | 26.03.2026 |
| Accepted for publication | 27.03.2026 |
| Available online | 10.04.2026 |